if it's going to be like 8 hours or less, with/without a half-baked multiplayer component, and or with a uninvolving story. Despite whatever cool setting, graphics, or characters it will have.
I picked up Battlefield 3 because of it's awesome multiplayer, it's co-op was a small treat, and it's singleplayer is nothing to write home about (even compared to other modern warfare shooter storylines).
I don't pick up Call of Duty, not because they are bad games, but because i don't really like it's multiplayer set up (just not my thing), and i am primarely a singleplayer person. if Call of Duty had an engaging story that was longer then the typical 4-6 hour run-time i would consider picking it up for $60 bucks.
If i spent 60 bucks on a game that lasted my 4-6 hours to complete, with no replay value in terms of the singleplayer and i'm not interested in it's multiplayer component. yeah. i just wasted money. could of easily just rented it for 2-6 bucks depending on where it's available.
Log in to comment