@loafofgame said:
@Jacanuk said:
That is a very dangerous slope your talking about there Loafofgame, you are advocating censorship, and that is something i am personally very much against even in more serious cases, people should have the right to say what they want, since people always have the right to stop listening.
Like in the case of rape, it is terrible that someone have to go through traumas like that, but it shouldn't prevent others who are just saying a word from saying that word. When there are other ways to avoid hearing it.
Again a minority should never force a majority to endure restrictions because that minority have a problem when it comes to freedom of speech.
There are proper contexts in which to utter the word rape. Swearing and insult within a game environment aren't such contexts. I'm not talking about censoring society at large. This is about the very strictly confined space of a videogame. Every game has strict rules. Not being allowed to swear can be considered a game rule, just like not hitting someone below the belt in boxing is considered a game rule. It safeguards sportsmanship (or gamemanship if you like). The majority of sports have rules to make sure people don't behave inappropriately or show disrespect. Tennis has ball abuse penalties, in football (soccer) you can receive a yellow or red card for foul language or insult, etc. Why are videogames any different in that regard? Swearing and insult do not aid the game, they have no tactical advantage, they serve no purpose within the game. It isn't even an opinion, it's just vented frustration. It has no place in the game field. If you can't respect your opponents you shouldn't play the game. To me this kind of stuff makes sense within the context of the game. Instead of telling people on the receiving end to deal with it, I'd say we tell the people who swear and insult to deal with it. Instead of telling people on the receiving end to use that mute button, I'd say we tell the people who swear and insult to mute themselves and swear in their own personal space, not in a public environment.
There is very little freedom within the context of a game. There are a myriad of rules that limit your options. That's the whole idea of a game. Limiting what you are allowed to say is just another game rule. It has nothing to do with what you (wish to) say outside the game context. It's about being a good sport and respecting your opponents. The fact that I'm not allowed to say certain things within the game doesn't limit my general freedom of speech in any way. It's part of the game.
The fact that you seen no infringement upon your freedoms just because you don't engage in such behavior yourself in no way means that that infringement doesn't exist upon those that wish to do so, however detestable you believe their usage and context to be. It is currently part of the majority of online games available, you wish to change it, hence you're proposing censorship. Of course you don't see any loss of rights because you choose not to exercise them in the first place.
In the online arena I've heard pretty much anything and everything the Internet has to offer. I don't know how familiar you are with sports Loaf, but a significant part of playing some is disrespecting and demeaning one's opponents. It's natural to competition. Personally, I don't see this so much intended as a personal slander as it is an attempt at psychological impact to lessen the morale (and drive up the frustration/anger through trying to give offense) of the opponent to get them flustered and pissed so they start playing poorly, or as that woman did, gave up altogether. You claim there is no "aid" or "tactical advantage" in behaving like an asshole and I could not possibly disagree more. I understand more dignified sports such as Tennis and Golf do not suite this approach but heavily physical ones such as Football and Rugby thrive off of it, and many of the online games so many act similar are cut from the same cloth. There's huge psychological elements at play.
I actually enjoy it when someone speaks to me negatively in a game, because firstly, I know I'm secure in myself enough to not let it get to me mentally or offend me to the point of trauma (and I can mute if I wish), and secondly, because it gives me further incentives to play better, win, and rub that little bastard's nose in defeat and have him/her eat their words while laughing at their rantings all the while as they get more and more enraged. It's hilarious.
Can I do this as effectively by playing as/with Mr. Rodgers? No. A large portion of competition is a massive, mental aggressive mind-****, just as it is physical, if not more so. In gaming, especially more so because that physiological intimidation aspect is absent. And like it or not, the implementation of harsh language is part of this. Why should this relevant psychological element be so heavily toned down and/or eradicated entirely for those who know how to conduct themselves but still wish to use terms that could be seen as offensive by others because someone else can't help but think the world owes them consideration towards their feelings? That it should be sensitive to their past hurtful experiences, which we've all endured in some way or another, and rather than taking the energy to address their issues will instead argue and push for a full-out Barney-fying of the online gaming community? It's fun to talk to people when playing against them and attempt to get under their skin--it's fun to toy with their minds--it's part of the experience and satisfaction of having a good multiplayer match. And yes, potentially offensive words enable this.
I hate to generalize, but I find people who allow themselves to take things so personally and get so riled up by insults by such a relatively minor activity need to expand their scope and come to realize how insignificant this is when compared to what really warrants attention. I'll say it again: there's mute and there's ignore. I have utilized both and have continued to much enjoyment, and to further start banning people due to using slang that is largely inherent to the nature of competition (like rape could easily be), is quite frankly, complete bullshit. Nevermind from a freedom of expression viewpoint, but simply a competitive one. I'm sure as hell not going to let little Johnny or his offendees take away my prerogative to use words and slang in a manner I find appropriate and effective to the situation I'm engaged in without a fight, especially when we all hold the power to ignore it not only mentally, but physically as well if it comes to that.
Ultimately, I would say if this is such an issue, don't play online, utilize the mute, or reside solely inside the Nintendo Nanny State in their carefully monitored family friendly online ecosystem (from what I've heard, anyway). It's always annoyed me that people think they should be afforded courtesy and respect by default. While I give it out myself, I always view it from others as a privilege to be grateful for, not a right to be enforced or entitled to. That's dangerous territory.
Log in to comment