It killed me inside when Sony said they would charge for multiplayer, i knew it was coming ever since Microsoft did it but i guess i was in self denial. The money was just too good to pass up really, but it begs the question though, if someone pays £40 for a boxed game, what exactly are they paying for, is it the single player alone or....cause there is something fundamentally wrong with this models, it sells an incomplete software for full price and expects the consumer to pay a value added to get the benefit of the full priced product. Its one of my many dislikes of microsoft to be frank, thank heavens people gave them hell for the DRM because if they got away with it, trust me Sony would follow suit as well. Now that i think of it, Microsoft seem to want to monetize everything they can get their hands on, i mean i have the new Windows 8 and i learnt i have to subscribe to use MS word!!!....and it does not come cheap at all, this is a software that used to come free with every other Windows before hand.
Even though i like the Xbox One and how robust the Kinect feature is, i cannot help that these technologies Microsoft pursuid were because of the added monetary advantages they have with the product, i mean it has already been observed by one of their executives, the advert merits of the Kinect tech, studying consumer behaviour and all that. Maybe i am paranoid but i just feel Microsoft are too aggressive with everything, it is almost as if they want to run the company like a Mafia, wanting to get a cutt from everything really. Very strange modern world for gamers we live in, i would keep my eye on the Steambox and what they choose to put out there, hopefully it is something very gamer focused, we really do need a shake up in this industry, these two corporate hydras are taking everyone for a ride
Log in to comment