So who else was disappointed with Starcraft 2 ?

i just beat the game and still thinking its good but not great they multiplayer is fun but i still cant believe it took them 10 years to pump this game out i expected a lot more personally anyone else feel the same ?

Not at all, it's just like a sequel should be: Basic game mechanics unchanged, new characters and units added, graphics spiced up and even the legendary balancing of SC1 is not messed up by the new stuff. This is exactly what I expected and hoped for.

I wanna play it so bad but i'm not sure how it'll run on my macbook pro...def not buying it if it wont even run good.

can't please them all, i never played starcraft so i wouldn't know "i'm not interested in RTS so sue me"

Not me. Not even a little. :)

I'm finding it very entertaining. But the game took like, what, seven years to make or something? They could have - and should have - knocked this out in three years at the most.MisterEditor

I am only disappointed in the fact that it only features the Terran campaign, and I wish Blizzard would release the full game instead of only one, albeit large, piece. I mean, they've been working on it for over a decade (from what I understand), I could have waited a few more for the full package. I guess Blizzard has been spending too much money on this to sell it at $60.

Not at all, it's just like a sequel should be: Basic game mechanics unchanged, new characters and units added, graphics spiced up and even the legendary balancing of SC1 is not messed up by the new stuff. This is exactly what I expected and hoped for.

Reptylus

What you describe is an expansion pack/graphics update. As a full blown sequel 10 years in the makingthey dont offer alot in terms of content compared to the original.

[QUOTE="MisterEditor"]I'm finding it very entertaining. But the game took like, what, seven years to make or something? They could have - and should have - knocked this out in three years at the most.GrandTheftDog