ico was extremely overrated, i didnt played this game through because i didnt trust that studio . But icos hd version was well done so thats good
@Lulu_Lulu: You don't review games like you would a lawn mower or a coffee machine, where the parts have to add up. You experience a game, just like you experience a film or a book, so naturally reviews have to take that into account. They're not rigid machines that have to work a certain way. Video games are something you are a part of. They are an experience, as I've said, and every review of every video game regards them as such in one way or another. To ignore that trait is to ignore a vital part of the medium.
@ojmstr said:
@Lulu_Lulu: Gamespot gave SOTC 8.7, user avarage here on Gamespot is 9.1, Meta Critic is 9.1. These number are proof that the majority of gamers rate this game very high and that means that most people think this game is good and few people like your self, around 10% of the people who have played this game think it`s a bad game. It`s all good though, we can`t all have the same opinions about games.
however most important thing in a video game is gameplay mechanics, since its a game that you play, usually reviews dont give a shit about gameplay, they are usually based on story and story-telling thats why last of us, walking dead, heavy rain were praised, only because of their stories. WD was a fucking interactive movie without different endings and it got 90-ish reviews ffs. Story matters too but, a good stor shouldnt be more important than good/innovative gameplay mechanichs in game reviews, thats why reviews dont mean much imo, they are reviewing games as if they were reviewing books.
btw, i havent played this game more than few mins, i am talking about reviews in general
Log in to comment