How long do you think a generation cycle should last?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TF626
TF626

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 TF626
Member since 2010 • 593 Posts
I am still enjoying this current generation, but it has been quite long. Do you think the next generation systems will have a shorter life cycle? Considering sales are down, or has technology peaked where they need to make it last several more years to develop newer technologies?
Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
5 years
Avatar image for Vickman178
Vickman178

866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Vickman178
Member since 2011 • 866 Posts

5-6 years no more no less.

Avatar image for Armoured_Mage
Armoured_Mage

766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Armoured_Mage
Member since 2005 • 766 Posts

4-5 yrs

Avatar image for thedarklinglord
thedarklinglord

1106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 thedarklinglord
Member since 2003 • 1106 Posts
5-8 years, with continued support for that generation for an additional 5 years - unless backwards compatibility is an option. While it's probably just a steaming pile of PR sound bite ponyloaf, I really appreciate Sony's stance that a new console shouldn't be released until it can offer a substantial improvement over the current generation. If the technology advances more rapidly, where it makes sense to launch a new console just 5 years after the last, then I'd have no issue with that (again, provided the previous generation is still supported and not immediately dump and forgotten like the original XBox was). But pushing out a new console with only marginally improved graphics, a few extra frames per second, and some lame gimmick (like a tablet controller or motion/voice controls) just to get something new out there? Not interested.
Avatar image for Vari3ty
Vari3ty

11111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Vari3ty
Member since 2009 • 11111 Posts

While this current generation has been a bit long, I do like the added length. I think around 6-7 years is an ideal length for a generation.

Avatar image for NiKva
NiKva

8181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 NiKva
Member since 2010 • 8181 Posts
As long as it takes for developers to have maxed out their games.
Avatar image for Devil-Itachi
Devil-Itachi

4387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Devil-Itachi
Member since 2005 • 4387 Posts
It depends.. but in general around 6-7 years for the next systems to arrive and 10+ years before the generation is actually removed from store shelves.
Avatar image for jsmoke03
jsmoke03

13717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#9 jsmoke03
Member since 2004 • 13717 Posts

8-10 years is good for a generation cycle. i think this would have been better and gamers would have welcomed a longer cycle had developers made a more varied market like the ps2. $60 a game really killed the market and the interest of most gamers

Avatar image for El_Zo1212o
El_Zo1212o

6057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 El_Zo1212o
Member since 2009 • 6057 Posts
I think the Sony ideal of ten years is right. Considering I generally wait 3-4 years to buy a new console, i still want to feel like I haven't missed the boat by seeing a new console on the horizon 2 years later. Frankly, I don't think this generation has had nearly enough time to develop. That's why I'll be glad to buy a Wii U- it is more of an extension of this generation than the forerunner of the next- and that's just what I'm looking for. And to everyone who loves to hate on Nintendo's next money machine: it's launch titles contain ports of games coming out late in the life of the current consoles. What will the machine produce 7 years from now?
Avatar image for sukraj
sukraj

27859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#11 sukraj
Member since 2008 • 27859 Posts

10 years

Avatar image for contracts420
contracts420

1956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 contracts420
Member since 2008 • 1956 Posts

I'd say 10 years is pretty solid. While some believe 5, that is just too short for them to be profitable in the long run. Many gamers won't even purchase a new generation of console till 2 or 3 years into its lifecycle and with only about 2 years left to look forward to, they'd be less willing to even bother with any new consoles.

I'd like this gen to continue, we are getting games like AC3, Bioshock Infinite, FarCry 3, The Last Of Us, GTAV, it becomes tough to justify a new console when we are still getting titles like these from current hardware.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

44098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 Archangel3371  Online
Member since 2004 • 44098 Posts
I prefer the typical 5 to 6 years myself.
Avatar image for Ashley_wwe
Ashley_wwe

13412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 Ashley_wwe
Member since 2003 • 13412 Posts

Just like contracts420 said, many gamers probably don't get a new console (well, I'm not sure on the actual stats) until at least a year or 2 after, so there is that to think about as well. I think a console's life cycle should be at least 6 years. With that being said though, I am still enjoying this current gen. For me, there is no real rush just yet. Games are still getting better this gen and there are still amazing games!

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

four iphones

Avatar image for HipHopBeats
HipHopBeats

2850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#16 HipHopBeats
Member since 2011 • 2850 Posts

I'd say 10 years is pretty solid. While some believe 5, that is just too short for them to be profitable in the long run. Many gamers won't even purchase a new generation of console till 2 or 3 years into its lifecycle and with only about 2 years left to look forward to, they'd be less willing to even bother with any new consoles.

I'd like this gen to continue, we are getting games like AC3, Bioshock Infinite, FarCry 3, The Last Of Us, GTAV, it becomes tough to justify a new console when we are still getting titles like these from current hardware.

contracts420

Many gamers are mainly interested in better graphics promised from next gen consoles. If the gameplay will still be the same, what's the rush? With games like AC3, GTAV, Beyond Two Souls, Metal Gear Ground Zereos, there is plenty of room for more solid gaming left in this gen. Plus I would definitely wait a good 2 - 4 years after a next gen console release to purchase, especially with all the R/YLOD's that plagued both consoles at the start of this gen.

Avatar image for xgraderx
xgraderx

2395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 xgraderx
Member since 2008 • 2395 Posts

4-5 years.But the console business is a hard one.It takes years before they even start making any money.Long console cycles may be the norm from now on.

Avatar image for AutoPilotOn
AutoPilotOn

8655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 AutoPilotOn
Member since 2010 • 8655 Posts
5 years and at least one gen backwards comparable.
Avatar image for El_Zo1212o
El_Zo1212o

6057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 El_Zo1212o
Member since 2009 • 6057 Posts

...I am still enjoying this current gen. For me, there is no real rush just yet.

Ashley_wwe
Thexactly why I'm going with the Wii U- I'm not ready to leave this generation behind just yet, but I still want to have the shiniest versions of the games available.
Avatar image for Flubbbs
Flubbbs

4968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Flubbbs
Member since 2010 • 4968 Posts

5-6 years

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#21 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

5-6 years

Flubbbs

This 5-6 years is good for some consoles.

current gen systems are already on 6-7 because November 17th will be the start of the 6th year for the PS3; November 19th would've been the 6th year for the Wii but Wii U releases one day before the Wii's 6th year; November 22nd will be the start of the Xbox 360's 7th year.

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

5-6 with an additional year of game support.

Avatar image for ItsJoeMama
ItsJoeMama

184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 ItsJoeMama
Member since 2012 • 184 Posts

What's up with people saying 5 years? That's way too short.

I think 7-8 years sounds fine.

Avatar image for Greyfeld
Greyfeld

3007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 Greyfeld
Member since 2008 • 3007 Posts

8-10 years, ideally.

I don't buy a console until it's at least a year or two old and has had a price drop. The wide majority of release software for new consoles is garbage. It's not really uncommon to see a solid lineup of exclusives for a console until about two years into its lifecycle.

Personally, I'm hoping that console developers will create future consoles with an eye toward keeping them relevant on the market for as long as possible. With how close we are to photo-realism, it doesn't seem like a huge stretch to bet that major console upgrades will become further and further apart.

Avatar image for Justforvisit
Justforvisit

2660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 Justforvisit
Member since 2011 • 2660 Posts

Simple answer:

As long as it's fun to play on that system

Avatar image for Borrizee
Borrizee

428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Borrizee
Member since 2012 • 428 Posts
Depends on what the progress is and how long it takes to take it to the limit. Maybe the question is how long do we want to play the same **** over and over again.
Avatar image for AutoPilotOn
AutoPilotOn

8655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 AutoPilotOn
Member since 2010 • 8655 Posts

What's up with people saying 5 years? That's way too short.

I think 7-8 years sounds fine.

ItsJoeMama
What's up with 7 to 8? I want updated quicker than that. I think current gen has been to long already
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

lol@people saying 10 years.

Why don't you stick to PS2 or SNES if you want decade old systems? :P

Avatar image for Venom_Raptor
Venom_Raptor

6959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 124

User Lists: 0

#29 Venom_Raptor
Member since 2010 • 6959 Posts

5-6 years.

Avatar image for Jehuty08
Jehuty08

1950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Jehuty08
Member since 2007 • 1950 Posts

Simple answer:

As long as it's fun to play on that system

Justforvisit

This

at this point in the last gens life, I was sick of it, But I am still perfectly content right now

Avatar image for the_last_ride
The_Last_Ride

76371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 122

User Lists: 2

#31 The_Last_Ride
Member since 2004 • 76371 Posts
as long as the system can put out good graphics and keep making good games
Avatar image for drunkin_donuts
drunkin_donuts

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 drunkin_donuts
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
the answer simply is WHENEVER TECHNOLOGY ALLOWS IT. First question would be.. who wants to keep paying $700 every 4-6 years for a new console? Technology has boomed so drastically in the past lets say, 10 years that we have reached a peak if you may. think about it. The NES and SEGA had to go because they found the technology for 32 BIT. SNES went because they found the technology for 64bit. Nintendo 64 went because DVD technology became available and could store more data (bigger, better games) Playstation 2, XBOX and Gamecube went because HDMI technology became available. THat puts us right now with our PS3, XBOX 360 and Nintendo Wii consoles. Motion sensor technology became available and RIGHT THERE a new console could have been made. Instead the companies made an attachment for their systems. What groundbreaking technology has came since then? 3d you say? 3D is so tempermental and still 'underground' if you may say. It needs to be more standard in HDTVs (mainstream) inorder for there to be a market for it. I think developers should just keep making games for the systems we already have, and when a new state-of-the-art technology hits... then we can BEGIN to think about 'next-gen consoles'
Avatar image for new_gamer244
new_gamer244

338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 new_gamer244
Member since 2011 • 338 Posts

Technology nowdays is advancing really fast, so.....6 years is the sweet spot for me.