Today, I read the GS review for "World in Conflict," which received a 9.5 rating. In the summary,there is no "The Bad" section underneath "The Good," as if there's nothing wrong with the game. I skimmed through the review, and there didn't seem to be any major criticism that kept the game from a 10 rating (I didn't seem to seeany of the typical "jumpy frame rate" or "sound a bit off" cliches that take away points, maybe I missed them). I know the rating system was changed to .5 increments early in the year, but I didn't pay any attention to any information aboutrating keys (sorry).Nevertheless I wonder if the 10 rating still exists, or if 9.5 is as high as it's going to get.
In my opinion, there should still be the 10 rating, because in the future, there is bound to be a perfect game up there with Ocarina of Time, Soul Calibur, Chrono Cross, and THPS3-PS2. There is no sane reason that a Perfect 10 game should be revoked .5 points out of neutrality. Why did World in Conflict receive a 9.5 and not a 10? The review didn't seem to answer that question.
Log in to comment