Did 343i do a better job with Halo multiplayer than Bungie?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GamerZem
GamerZem

526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 GamerZem
Member since 2012 • 526 Posts

I personally thought Halo 4's multiplayer was outstanding, and was better than previous Halo multiplayer's.

Avatar image for Socijalisticka
Socijalisticka

1555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Socijalisticka
Member since 2011 • 1555 Posts

Because they've opted to incorporate the obscene rank system of the COD-likes, the pleb masses can rejoice at the illusion of progression, while performing nothing but the most tedious grindsh*tfest. Halo 1-3 are superior by default.

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts
I am not a huge fan of halo 4 multiplayer. I can't fathom who thought randomly spawning weapons was a good idea.
Avatar image for Vari3ty
Vari3ty

11111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Vari3ty
Member since 2009 • 11111 Posts

They basically just copied Bungie. Nothing really innovative on their part.

Avatar image for GamerZem
GamerZem

526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 GamerZem
Member since 2012 • 526 Posts

They basically just copied Bungie. Nothing really innovative on their part.

Vari3ty

The core gameplay mechanics were the same, but 343i added things like loadouts, ordance drops, etc.

Avatar image for Djmaster214
Djmaster214

3240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Djmaster214
Member since 2005 • 3240 Posts

superior in every way, i didnt like halo 2 or 3 but love 4 to death

Avatar image for GamerZem
GamerZem

526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 GamerZem
Member since 2012 • 526 Posts

superior in every way, i didnt like halo 2 or 3 but love 4 to death

Djmaster214

I loved Halo 3, hated reach, didn't play much of Halo 2 but played the hell out of CE. Halo 4 is by far superior.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

44161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 44161 Posts
As much as I loved the multiplayer in Bungie's game I like this one better. Most of that has to do with the ability for people to join matches in progress. No more suffering through lop-sided matches because some team-mates dropped out. Thank god.
Avatar image for xgraderx
xgraderx

2395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 xgraderx
Member since 2008 • 2395 Posts
As much as I loved the multiplayer in Bungie's game I like this one better. Most of that has to do with the ability for people to join matches in progress. No more suffering through lop-sided matches because some team-mates dropped out. Thank god.Archangel3371
Agreed,this was a big improvement.
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

I personally thought Halo 4's multiplayer was outstanding, and was better than previous Halo multiplayer's.

GamerZem

Give the game some time to sit on and reflect, it's so new. I have friends that absolutely hate Halo 4's MP and say it's CODified. I have friends that like the new game's MP, and finally I have friends that feel it's too similar to the past Bungie games and feel bored with the MP. I tell all three groups of RL friends the true test is TIME. One year from now, how many gamers will be playing it, how many will have left for other games? That's the true test.

Also, according to Metacritic the answer to your question (Did 343 do a better job with Halo than Bungie) could be interpreted as no, 343i achieved AA (80%+) with a main Halo title, and Bungie achieved AAA (90%+) with their main Halo titles. Main being Halo 1, 2, 3, Reach, and 4.

Avatar image for Crypt_mx
Crypt_mx

4739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#11 Crypt_mx
Member since 2007 • 4739 Posts

Halo 4's multiplayer has totally lost its identity in my opinion. Now its just CoD with oversheilds...343i couldn't have done anything stupider in my eyes.

But perhaps it was smart, to draw in the CoD fans with something they are familiar with. Then again, one of the above posters said he hated 2 and 3 but loves 4, how the hell did you HATE Halo 2? I guess thats just the crowd they are bringing in nowadays.

Avatar image for wavey_gravey
wavey_gravey

11155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#12 wavey_gravey
Member since 2007 • 11155 Posts
I personally didn't like what Bungie did with Reach multiplayer having loved and played to death Halo 3. I do think that Halo 4 is better than Reach in the MP stakes, for instance I love the fact that you can now join in progress. I lost so much Rep playing Reach because my connection kept crapping out, and Iost count of the times I had to stick out a match 1 v 4 because all my team mates left. I guess time will tell whether Halo 4 will be as well beloved as Bungie's earlier efforts.
Avatar image for GamerZem
GamerZem

526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 GamerZem
Member since 2012 • 526 Posts

I personally didn't like what Bungie did with Reach multiplayer having loved and played to death Halo 3. I do think that Halo 4 is better than Reach in the MP stakes, for instance I love the fact that you can now join in progress. I lost so much Rep playing Reach because my connection kept crapping out, and Iost count of the times I had to stick out a match 1 v 4 because all my team mates left. I guess time will tell whether Halo 4 will be as well beloved as Bungie's earlier efforts.wavey_gravey

Well, really, Reach was good for a while. By the time I had ranked up to Legend, I had begun to hate it. I don't really know why, but I just did.

That never happened to me with Halo 3.

Avatar image for tjoeb123
tjoeb123

6843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#14 tjoeb123
Member since 2004 • 6843 Posts
As much as I loved the multiplayer in Bungie's game I like this one better. Most of that has to do with the ability for people to join matches in progress. No more suffering through lop-sided matches because some team-mates dropped out. Thank god.Archangel3371
I actually hated that. Here's why.... Tjoeb13: "Okay, let's do this! Let me be Unfrigginbelievable!" (Map loads) 0:05 0:04 0:03 0:02 0:01 GAME OVER Tjoeb123: "WTF JUST HAPPENED?!?!!?" Note: My brother bought Halo 4 and borrowed my Xbox. So yes I have the game but I haven't had the chance to play it yet. That was just based on my experience with that in Call of Duty. Though, it wasn't as bad in Reach's Custom Games...where you could join your friends.
Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

44161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 44161 Posts
[QUOTE="Archangel3371"]As much as I loved the multiplayer in Bungie's game I like this one better. Most of that has to do with the ability for people to join matches in progress. No more suffering through lop-sided matches because some team-mates dropped out. Thank god.tjoeb123
I actually hated that. Here's why.... Tjoeb13: "Okay, let's do this! Let me be Unfrigginbelievable!" (Map loads) 0:05 0:04 0:03 0:02 0:01 GAME OVER Tjoeb123: "WTF JUST HAPPENED?!?!!?" Note: My brother bought Halo 4 and borrowed my Xbox. So yes I have the game but I haven't had the chance to play it yet. That was just based on my experience with that in Call of Duty. Though, it wasn't as bad in Reach's Custom Games...where you could join your friends.

Unless you keep jumping around searching for a new game after every single match this really shouldn't be a problem. If you get in one that ends just stick around and play the next one or two or three.
Avatar image for contracts420
contracts420

1956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 contracts420
Member since 2008 • 1956 Posts

I have yet to play the game but am looking forward to it. But from an audio and visual standpoint... they easily outclassed Bungie.

Avatar image for xgraderx
xgraderx

2395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 xgraderx
Member since 2008 • 2395 Posts

[QUOTE="GamerZem"]

I personally thought Halo 4's multiplayer was outstanding, and was better than previous Halo multiplayer's.

SolidTy

Give the game some time to sit on and reflect, it's so new. I have friends that absolutely hate Halo 4's MP and say it's CODified. I have friends that like the new game's MP, and finally I have friends that feel it's too similar to the past Bungie games and feel bored with the MP. I tell all three groups of RL friends the true test is TIME. One year from now, how many gamers will be playing it, how many will have left for other games? That's the true test.

Also, according to Metacritic the answer to your question (Did 343 do a better job with Halo than Bungie) could be interpreted as no, 343i achieved AA (80%+) with a main Halo title, and Bungie achieved AAA (90%+) with their main Halo titles. Main being Halo 1, 2, 3, Reach, and 4.

I understand what you are saying ,but bad reviews dont determine the quality of a game.As far as scores go,most of us including myself only use trusted reviewers to give us an idea of how good a game is and then its up to us.
Avatar image for MathMattS
MathMattS

4012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#18 MathMattS
Member since 2009 • 4012 Posts

Overall, with both singleplayer and multiplayer, I think Bungie and 343 Industries are at about the same level.

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

[QUOTE="GamerZem"]

I personally thought Halo 4's multiplayer was outstanding, and was better than previous Halo multiplayer's.

xgraderx

Give the game some time to sit on and reflect, it's so new. I have friends that absolutely hate Halo 4's MP and say it's CODified. I have friends that like the new game's MP, and finally I have friends that feel it's too similar to the past Bungie games and feel bored with the MP. I tell all three groups of RL friends the true test is TIME. One year from now, how many gamers will be playing it, how many will have left for other games? That's the true test.

Also, according to Metacritic the answer to your question (Did 343 do a better job with Halo than Bungie) could be interpreted as no, 343i achieved AA (80%+) with a main Halo title, and Bungie achieved AAA (90%+) with their main Halo titles. Main being Halo 1, 2, 3, Reach, and 4.

I understand what you are saying ,but bad reviews dont determine the quality of a game.As far as scores go,most of us including myself only use trusted reviewers to give us an idea of how good a game is and then its up to us.

I only use trusted reviewers myself and I've preached and preached about that here at GS over the years, but I wasn't speaking from a personal perspective but a more general one to answer the TC's general question.

If I was speaking to you, I would lean more on my statement about the true test being TIME, and for us to judge it individually if we can. However, that wouldn't answer the TC's question very well. :P