BioHazard(RE)Saturn version?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6vHE8ZQxJs&feature=related

o.o

What the?

Im not even sure what youre asking

??

I had the Saturn version:cool:

only true problem with it is the loading(opening doors) is on average like 3 seconds longer, no arrange mode verison has been on the saturn either. but yeah for saturn fans i'd recommend biohazard over the us release, its uncut and costs like 14 bucks.

Okay, great video. But what are you saying about it?

this was the first system i played resident evil on.

I'm asking you guys,if it's a good version?

I'm asking you guys,if it's a good version?

GreekGameManiac

I'm asking you guys,if it's a good version?

GreekGameManiac

yes it's a good version. I like it a little more than the psx versions because of the colors and the extra's. if you can though, get it for gamecube

The only disadvantage the game had is that it came out like a year later than the PS version.

That's not very relevant today, but back then it was a drag.

The only disadvantage the game had is that it came out like a year later than the PS version.

That's not very relevant today, but back then it was a drag.

Panzer_Zwei

[QUOTE="Panzer_Zwei"]

The only disadvantage the game had is that it came out like a year later than the PS version.

That's not very relevant today, but back then it was a drag.

Darkman2007

Exactly. It was more like BIO HAZARD now for the SS, instead of the big game it was when it came out.

Same story with NOCTURNE IN THE MOONLIGHT. Had it come out around the same time than the PS version, even with the same flaws and without any extras. It still would've been a much higher profile release than how it turned out to be.

And BIO HAZARD was huge in Japan. Though believe it or not, it wasn't seen as goofy as in the west. If you've seen any Japanese movie with native English speaking actors, then you'd understand the why of BIO HAZARD dialogue and voice acting quality.

For some reason they used to redub their lines (of the native, fluent English speaking actors) to make them sound like they came out from an English learning school.

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="Panzer_Zwei"]

The only disadvantage the game had is that it came out like a year later than the PS version.

That's not very relevant today, but back then it was a drag.

Panzer_Zwei

Exactly. It was more like BIO HAZARD now for the SS, instead of the big game it was when it came out.

Same story with NOCTURNE IN THE MOONLIGHT. Had it come out around the same time than the PS version, even with the same flaws and without any extras. It still would've been a much higher profile release than how it turned out to be.

And BIO HAZARD was huge in Japan. Though believe it or not, it wasn't seen as goofy as in the west. If you've seen any Japanese movie with native English speaking actors, then you'd understand the why of BIO HAZARD dialogue and voice acting quality.

For some reason they used to redub their lines (of the native, fluent English speaking actors) to make them sound like they came out from an English learning school.

also reason why in japan shenmue with english voice acting was seen as the better game and they actually re released it. ridiculous.

also reason why in japan shenmue with english voice acting was seen as the better game and they actually re released it. ridiculous.

bultje112

No, US SHENMUE was highly despised, and sold very poorly.

It wasn't quite the same thing tough. The case of US SHEMUE would be like if someone released a Japanese game in the US without subtitles.

The graphics are worse than the PSX version, but it has an exclusive Battle Game that features a zombie Wesker and a gold Tyrant.

The graphics are worse than the PSX version, but it has an exclusive Battle Game that features a zombie Wesker and a gold Tyrant.

SonOfChewbacca

the graphics are worse is about as subjective as can be.

[QUOTE="SonOfChewbacca"]

The graphics are worse than the PSX version, but it has an exclusive Battle Game that features a zombie Wesker and a gold Tyrant.

bultje112

the graphics are worse is about as subjective as can be.

[QUOTE="bultje112"]

[QUOTE="SonOfChewbacca"]

The graphics are worse than the PSX version, but it has an exclusive Battle Game that features a zombie Wesker and a gold Tyrant.

rilpas

the graphics are worse is about as subjective as can be.

[QUOTE="rilpas"][QUOTE="bultje112"]

the graphics are worse is about as subjective as can be.

Darkman2007

Like the original PS version is a technical achievement.

I don't think graphical differences matter much in this case.

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="rilpas"] didn't lens of truth do a technical comparison of both versions and end up choosing the PS1 version?Panzer_Zwei

Like the original PS version is a technical achievement.

I don't think graphical differences matter much in this case.

[QUOTE="Panzer_Zwei"]

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"] I read it before , some of the things they say are true, but some of it is just stupid (like the loading differences, I have both versions and its hardly noticable) they are right about the effects though , they suck on the Saturn for the most part.Darkman2007

Like the original PS version is a technical achievement.

I don't think graphical differences matter much in this case.

The SS had DEEP FEAR, which in my opinion is just as accomplished survival horror game, in spite of its totally forgettable character cast.

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="Panzer_Zwei"]

Like the original PS version is a technical achievement.

I don't think graphical differences matter much in this case.

Panzer_Zwei

The SS had DEEP FEAR, which in my opinion is just as accomplished survival horror game, in spite of its totally forgettable character cast.

[QUOTE="Panzer_Zwei"]

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"] I would have been more interested to see RE2 on the Saturn , but thats a different matter.Darkman2007

The SS had DEEP FEAR, which in my opinion is just as accomplished survival horror game, in spite of its totally forgettable character cast.

Gameplay and theme-wise I found it a lot better.

The story and characters is what I've always found lacking.

Main character is awful, they couldn't come out with something more generic if they tried.

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="rilpas"] didn't lens of truth do a technical comparison of both versions and end up choosing the PS1 version?Panzer_Zwei

Like the original PS version is a technical achievement.

I don't think graphical differences matter much in this case.

exactly. it's like nitpicking. the gamecube version, now that is a graphical difference. but especially with out eyes of today the differences in graphics between re1 on saturn and psx mean almost nothing. I for one liked more the vibrant color use on the saturn version

Well, I meant to say that the Saturn version looks "worse" in that it lacks transparencies and lighting on character models and objects. Overall not a huge difference, but it's noticeable.

Well, I meant to say that the Saturn version looks "worse" in that it lacks transparencies and lighting on character models and objects. Overall not a huge difference, but it's noticeable.

SonOfChewbacca

honestly from what I've seen, I'd say it's a toss up, just buy the cheapest one :Prilpas

better yet, who's controller you prefer.

[QUOTE="rilpas"]honestly from what I've seen, I'd say it's a toss up, just buy the cheapest one :Pbultje112

better yet, who's controller you prefer.

[QUOTE="bultje112"]

[QUOTE="rilpas"]honestly from what I've seen, I'd say it's a toss up, just buy the cheapest one :PAlexKidd5000

better yet, who's controller you prefer.

[QUOTE="AlexKidd5000"][QUOTE="bultje112"]

better yet, who's controller you prefer.

Darkman2007

the 3d controller is the best controller I've ever felt in my hands.

the 3d controller is the best controller I've ever felt in my hands.

bultje112