Avatar image for Fantasy_Gamer
Fantasy_Gamer

14159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Fantasy_Gamer
Member since 2004 • 14159 Posts
The 2d version is a classic. It cannot be replaced no matter how good the 3d version will be, but I am surely loking forward to this version. This will answer my long question about, "what will be the experience and how will it look like if it was made during this time and not decades ago?" The same goes for FF5 and FF6.
Avatar image for cloudstrife145
cloudstrife145

1051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 61

User Lists: 0

#2 cloudstrife145
Member since 2006 • 1051 Posts

nut rili

Avatar image for Sprigain
Sprigain

3575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#3 Sprigain
Member since 2006 • 3575 Posts
im not sure if i would get it already played the original and the gba remake, i don't think there would be anything different other than the 3D graphics, i have mixed reactions about it
Avatar image for Ebi_Furya
Ebi_Furya

258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#4 Ebi_Furya
Member since 2006 • 258 Posts

I know i probably wont get it unless I find it used for $10 or something. I've played through the SNES / GBA versions so many times now, that I've seen and done it all and it would just be the same thing only in 3D.

Personally, I'm getting tired of them sucking as much money out of I - VI that they can. Do we really need 10 versions of each game? I don't want to start a huge debate here, but it's time they moved on to the PS games...

Avatar image for ThreeVo
ThreeVo

595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 ThreeVo
Member since 2007 • 595 Posts

Hmmm well.. I say dont fix whats not broken. What i wonder is why they would pour so much mnoney into a ps1 remake and a gba remake just to make another one..for the ds wether it be 3d rendered or not..

My only concern is that given the upcoming games from SE and even the preveious ones that appear on the ds or any other hand held consoles, They will fail to present it in the adultlike mannar that they should.. Im thinking more on the lines of a psp quality mature versoin of the game. seeing as psp is able to capture more life like animations. Im hoping it does not turn out to be another ff3 remake..... a Little people with big heads number... FF4 should be presented in a lifelike way to truly capture the drama. and the ds imo is not able to create that.

Avatar image for hammer_of_thor_
hammer_of_thor_

2260

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#6 hammer_of_thor_
Member since 2007 • 2260 Posts
I'm looking forward to it, there aren't many 2D games that get converted to 3D, and I've always wanted to play some.
Avatar image for duncanr2n
duncanr2n

2449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 duncanr2n
Member since 2003 • 2449 Posts

Well, if they're going to remake it, I'd prefer that they go the way that they are with FFI & II on the PSP.  Stick with the 2D graphics but make it look nicer.  Given that they are going 3D, I also question the platform.  It seems a bit of waste to convert it to 3D, and use the weakest system out there right now.  At least put it on the PSP so we can have PS2 quality graphics in the palms of our hands, better yet give it the full treatment and put on the 360 or PS3.

Regardless of where or how, they better not mess with the gameplay.  Please don't tweak anything, just leave the gameplay as is.

Avatar image for ff-gamer
ff-gamer

280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ff-gamer
Member since 2006 • 280 Posts
never knew that they were remaking it so i don't care
Avatar image for NeoGen85
NeoGen85

4270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 NeoGen85
Member since 2003 • 4270 Posts

Well, if they're going to remake it, I'd prefer that they go the way that they are with FFI & II on the PSP.  Stick with the 2D graphics but make it look nicer.  Given that they are going 3D, I also question the platform.  It seems a bit of waste to convert it to 3D, and use the weakest system out there right now.  At least put it on the PSP so we can have PS2 quality graphics in the palms of our hands, better yet give it the full treatment and put on the 360 or PS3.

Regardless of where or how, they better not mess with the gameplay.  Please don't tweak anything, just leave the gameplay as is.

duncanr2n

It's all about the international install base of the DS. But you know these full 3-D conversions come with new gameplay most of the time.

Avatar image for StillB0RED
StillB0RED

383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 StillB0RED
Member since 2006 • 383 Posts
I'm happy but I wish they'd remake FF6.
Avatar image for NWA_31
NWA_31

11922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 NWA_31
Member since 2006 • 11922 Posts

I'm happy but I wish they'd remake FF6.StillB0RED

Same here :D

Avatar image for AuthenticM
AuthenticM

748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 AuthenticM
Member since 2007 • 748 Posts
They should remake Final Fantasy I through VI for the PSP just like the 20th Anniversary editions, and then stop completely from remaking them. How could they improve upon the 20th Anniversary editions anyway? They look perfect. They should just remake FFVII already.
Avatar image for Etheralfayt
Etheralfayt

477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 Etheralfayt
Member since 2004 • 477 Posts
I think its dumb they dont need to be remaking old stuff over and over agian they need to stay focused and create new properties and franchises, the only remake they even sounds any good would be FFVII for the PS3. I dont like the idea of changing FFIV which was great as it was to wat they're making it to be... seems like a waste of time and money.
Avatar image for NWA_31
NWA_31

11922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 NWA_31
Member since 2006 • 11922 Posts

I think its dumb they dont need to be remaking old stuff over and over agian they need to stay focused and create new properties and franchises, the only remake they even sounds any good would be FFVII for the PS3. I dont like the idea of changing FFIV which was great as it was to wat they're making it to be... seems like a waste of time and money.Etheralfayt

Actually, FFIV is Square-Enix's third remake. The other 2 being FFIII and FF I & II 20th anniversary edition. The rest were all slightly-improved ports.

Avatar image for DJ-Lafleur
DJ-Lafleur

35604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#15 DJ-Lafleur
Member since 2007 • 35604 Posts
I'll probably end up buying it when it comes out. I like FF4 on the SNES and GBA, so playing it in 3-D on the DS could be pretty interesting.  So I'm happy about them remaking FF4, but at the same time, it would be pretty cool if they could focus on other Final Fantasies past 6, as well.
Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#16 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts

[QUOTE="Etheralfayt"]I think its dumb they dont need to be remaking old stuff over and over agian they need to stay focused and create new properties and franchises, the only remake they even sounds any good would be FFVII for the PS3. I dont like the idea of changing FFIV which was great as it was to wat they're making it to be... seems like a waste of time and money.NWA_31

Actually, FFIV is Square-Enix's third remake. The other 2 being FFIII and FF I & II 20th anniversary edition. The rest were all slightly-improved ports.

FFI and FFII are 2 games, and they are also ports
Avatar image for IAMSHAWN
IAMSHAWN

180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#17 IAMSHAWN
Member since 2007 • 180 Posts

I never played 4 on my snes because it didn't save and I dont have any sony systems so

Hell Ya i'm excited

Avatar image for NWA_31
NWA_31

11922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 NWA_31
Member since 2006 • 11922 Posts
[QUOTE="NWA_31"]

[QUOTE="Etheralfayt"]I think its dumb they dont need to be remaking old stuff over and over agian they need to stay focused and create new properties and franchises, the only remake they even sounds any good would be FFVII for the PS3. I dont like the idea of changing FFIV which was great as it was to wat they're making it to be... seems like a waste of time and money.fs_metal

Actually, FFIV is Square-Enix's third remake. The other 2 being FFIII and FF I & II 20th anniversary edition. The rest were all slightly-improved ports.

FFI and FFII are 2 games, and they are also ports

Oh really ? I didn't know they were 2 games.

But no, they really are remakes.

Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#19 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts
[QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="NWA_31"]

[QUOTE="Etheralfayt"]I think its dumb they dont need to be remaking old stuff over and over agian they need to stay focused and create new properties and franchises, the only remake they even sounds any good would be FFVII for the PS3. I dont like the idea of changing FFIV which was great as it was to wat they're making it to be... seems like a waste of time and money.NWA_31

Actually, FFIV is Square-Enix's third remake. The other 2 being FFIII and FF I & II 20th anniversary edition. The rest were all slightly-improved ports.

FFI and FFII are 2 games, and they are also ports

Oh really ? I didn't know they were 2 games.

But no, they really are remakes.

No. They are ports
Avatar image for NWA_31
NWA_31

11922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 NWA_31
Member since 2006 • 11922 Posts
[QUOTE="NWA_31"][QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="NWA_31"]

[QUOTE="Etheralfayt"]I think its dumb they dont need to be remaking old stuff over and over agian they need to stay focused and create new properties and franchises, the only remake they even sounds any good would be FFVII for the PS3. I dont like the idea of changing FFIV which was great as it was to wat they're making it to be... seems like a waste of time and money.fs_metal

Actually, FFIV is Square-Enix's third remake. The other 2 being FFIII and FF I & II 20th anniversary edition. The rest were all slightly-improved ports.

FFI and FFII are 2 games, and they are also ports

Oh really ? I didn't know they were 2 games.

But no, they really are remakes.

No. They are ports

How is it a port ? Everything is new and built from scratch and you cant find a similar version on any other system. Its a remake alright. 

Avatar image for Etheralfayt
Etheralfayt

477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Etheralfayt
Member since 2004 • 477 Posts
[QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="NWA_31"][QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="NWA_31"]

[QUOTE="Etheralfayt"]I think its dumb they dont need to be remaking old stuff over and over agian they need to stay focused and create new properties and franchises, the only remake they even sounds any good would be FFVII for the PS3. I dont like the idea of changing FFIV which was great as it was to wat they're making it to be... seems like a waste of time and money.NWA_31

Actually, FFIV is Square-Enix's third remake. The other 2 being FFIII and FF I & II 20th anniversary edition. The rest were all slightly-improved ports.

FFI and FFII are 2 games, and they are also ports

Oh really ? I didn't know they were 2 games.

But no, they really are remakes.

No. They are ports

How is it a port ? Everything is new and built from scratch and you cant find a similar version on any other system. Its a remake alright. 

If you count the Anneversery  addition a remake then you gotta count Orgins and dawn of souls excetra remakes too. I on the other hand agree that they are updated ports.. they only have slightly better graphics and a few new things such as art gallerys and new secret dungeons the games remain much the same.

Avatar image for NWA_31
NWA_31

11922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 NWA_31
Member since 2006 • 11922 Posts
I agree that they are pretty much the same thing, but isn't that the point of a remake ? To recreate the game, but with updated graphics ?
Avatar image for ThreeVo
ThreeVo

595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 ThreeVo
Member since 2007 • 595 Posts

Actually..... they are ports sry to say......

they simply remasterd the music and tweaked the graphics alittle on the gba versions but for the most part they are definelty not remakes..... ff 3.. thats a remake

Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#24 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts
[QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="NWA_31"][QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="NWA_31"]

[QUOTE="Etheralfayt"]I think its dumb they dont need to be remaking old stuff over and over agian they need to stay focused and create new properties and franchises, the only remake they even sounds any good would be FFVII for the PS3. I dont like the idea of changing FFIV which was great as it was to wat they're making it to be... seems like a waste of time and money.NWA_31

Actually, FFIV is Square-Enix's third remake. The other 2 being FFIII and FF I & II 20th anniversary edition. The rest were all slightly-improved ports.

FFI and FFII are 2 games, and they are also ports

Oh really ? I didn't know they were 2 games.

But no, they really are remakes.

No. They are ports

How is it a port ? Everything is new and built from scratch and you cant find a similar version on any other system. Its a remake alright.

No. It is hte GBA version upgraded with the CGI scenes from the PSX version added in
Avatar image for Flame_Blade88
Flame_Blade88

39348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#25 Flame_Blade88
Member since 2005 • 39348 Posts
I'd rather a Final Fantasy VI remake.