A very Diappointing game that made me cry of Disappointment. Worst FPS Campaign and Multiplayer ever. Waste of Mo
Dartadion wrote this review on .
So I finished the campaign in about 6-6.5 hours only to be diappointed with the storyline that could have been worked upon a lot. I try multiplayer and find myself even more disappointed. Very unoriginal multiplayer modes with a ranking system that made me vomit. You need to keep playing online to unlock new weapons. Come on were is the fun in that. 10 games to unlock the 2nd worst sniper and so on. In other FPS you have all the weapons on the field for you so its strategic. This is just pick 2 guns for the whole round. Great one has to be a crappy pistol and the other your own choice.
Even worse, no 2-4 multiplayer online. Disappointment all the way round. Pathetic. The games jump is 2mm high and you press A for when you need to jump and the game does it for you. Also your a soldier with no bullet proof vests in a war. Your asking for the enemy to kill you. No Very realistic physis so Ragdoll Fans beware, No good physics. And melee is a stupid knife. I truly wonder how this game is the most played game on Xbox Live.
All I have to say is Call of Duty: World At War better improve on what COD 4 did but since it runs on the same engine it will be just as worse probably. Not for Halo, Far Cry, Medal of Honour, Rainbow Six Vegas and all FPS fans because you will be disappointed. So remember if you see COD 4 on special at a store, don't think about and buy Halo 3 or another FPS. If it's COD 5 then Far Cry 2.
Anything but Call Of Duty!!!!!