Sign on Options
Theme:

Why overclock?

Overclocking the system processor is one of the easiest tweaks you can do to get more performance out of your PC. Motherboard manufacturers have steadily opened up more voltage and clock-speed options within the system BIOS to give ambitious overclockers the tools they need to get the most out of their CPUs. Processor manufacturers, desperate to capture the gaming market, have also relaxed their anti-overclocking stance, as we've recently seen in awkward lunges aimed at the PC gamer: the "unlocked" Athlon 64 FX and the Intel Extreme Edition processors.

The FX and Extreme Edition chips fill a need for extreme overclockers who are looking to create the fastest chip possible using any means necessary. But regular enthusiasts know that paying $1,000 for an unlocked chip violates the spirit of overclocking--the entire purpose of the act is to get an inexpensive processor running as fast as a ridiculously expensive one.

For this edition of Press Start, we'll get you familiar with the basics of overclocking and explain what kind of equipment you'll need to get started. This feature isn't a comprehensive guide, as there are entire Web sites devoted to the subject, but hopefully you'll learn enough to determine whether or not you'd like to give overclocking a try.

What you need

If you want to overclock effectively, you need a few choice components. You'll want to get a CPU that has lots of headroom, a large speed margin between its standard speed and the top speeds achieved by other processors that share the same basic microarchitecture design. You're also going to need a motherboard that gives you the necessary overclocking tools like CPU and northbridge voltage selection options. Then you might want to consider upgrading the CPU cooling, although that does add considerable expense and some CPUs have been known to be phenomenal overclockers using the stock fans and heatsinks.

The CPU model greatly affects what kind of overclock you can expect. Numerous Web sites and forums cover which processors are the most suitable for overclocking. For a good budget overclocking attempt, you want to stick to CPUs that cost less than $250. Sometimes, great bargains appear in the $150 range, but they don't come along too often. Among modern processors, the best bets for overclocking lie in the budget segments of Intel's new Core2 Duo and AMD's Athlon 64 X2 processors. Exact model numbers will vary as time goes on, but you usually want to go with the slower processor models since they're cheaper and provide more overclocking headroom.

Not all CPUs of the same model will overclock to the same levels. Some CPUs can run a little faster, while others can't. The more expensive processors have all been qualified to run at higher speeds, but the cheaper processors may have only graded out at lower speeds. When you buy a processor specifically for overclocking you're basically betting that the manufacturer's production quality is high enough that even the inexpensive chips can run at much faster speeds.

Pair up your CPU with memory suitable for the job. If you're going for a budget overclock, purchase only the speed you need. Low latency memory and high-speed memory cost a substantial amount and provide marginal gains in comparison to a large CPU overclock. If you're looking to squeeze out the most performance, regardless of budget, then premium memory is worth exploring. Buying faster memory "in preparation for the future" is pointless since you'll likely need a new a type of memory by the time you're ready to upgrade.

You will also need a motherboard that's willing to cooperate in the overclocking plan. Companies like Asus, DFI, MSI, Gigabyte, and Abit all manufacture motherboards specifically made for the tweaker. These motherboards feature extra options in the BIOS, more advanced cooling features, and better power-handling capabilities. Stay away from Intel brand boards and many name-brand pre-built systems if you plan on overclocking since they often don't have the BIOS settings that allow you to overclock the processor.

Extra cooling in the form of faster fans, better heat sinks, and water cooling (if you want to go exotic) all help to improve your chances of achieving a successful overclock. Some notable companies in the field of cooling include Thermaltake, Zalman, Alpha, and Thermalright among others, but lots of overclockers have had good success using the standard cooling units that come with the processor.

A good thermal paste, when correctly applied, is an absolute must-have especially if you're sticking with the stock heatsink and fan. There's no shortage of companies pedaling a cornucopia of metallic slimes: Arctic Silver, OCZ, Masscool, Antec, Kingwin, Cooler Master, and Artic Cooling. The key to unlocking the benefits of thermal compounds involves how you apply them. Make sure to place an even and very thin layer over the CPU. If you have too much paste on the CPU, the compound actually inhibits the transfer of heat to the heatsink.

Are you an experienced veteran with several processors under your belt? What CPU do you have and how high have you overclocked it?

282 Comments

  • hurricaner

    Posted Aug 1, 2009 5:46 pm GMT

    I am on a Gateway GT5422E Running on Stock Fans with the stock processor (AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 5000+, dual core processor ) Stock motherboard , I switched the RAM over to 2 Gigs(PNY DIMM DDR2 Memory) , i installed a dedicated graphics card(NVIDIA Geoforce GTX 260) i switched the 300 watt power supply over to a 550 watt power supply.it runs great but i think the fans make too much noise so i am going to switch the CPU over to liquid cooling so that the heat from the CPU doesn't cause the whole system to panic(the power supply regulates the temperature inside of the PC with a thermostat so the heat from the CPU enters directly into the power supply and the power supply believes the temperature in the whole case is higher than it actually is.)i pray that this next upgrade that i am going to do will resolve the problem

  • Wings_008

    Posted Jul 16, 2009 4:22 pm GMT

    i managed to OC my P4 3.2Ghz processor to 4.0 with the voltage set to 1.6v
    with a MSI P35 neo combo and a i-gloo 5710 heatsink (beware P4 run very hot when OC'ed)
    the golden rule is : to buy a well built and trusted products not the priciest am a college student so i don't have the money to buy a new pc

  • mehrdad1987

    Posted Jun 12, 2009 1:44 pm GMT

    Very Cool, thanks Gamespot. Gamespot Is The Best ! ! !, imo

  • chrisf1

    Posted May 8, 2009 4:53 am GMT

    any help on getting it higher i would be greatfull thanks chris

  • chrisf1

    Posted May 8, 2009 4:50 am GMT

    would try higher on cpu but told amd fx62 not very good for overclocking

  • chrisf1

    Posted May 8, 2009 4:49 am GMT

    by the way temps never go over 45 degree's on processor and 60 on graphics at full load

  • chrisf1

    Posted May 8, 2009 4:47 am GMT

    amd fx62@3.2ghz stable,crosshair mobo,4 gig 1066 ddr2 ram,2 terabytes harddrives,1 blu ray+1dvd rewriter,ati powercolor pcs 4870 1 gig o/c @ gpu 800mhz+memory 1005mhz all prime stable etc upgrading to new phenom 2 quad asap,zalman cooler thanks chris aslo runing vista x64 changing to windows 7 rc1

  • fazz81

    Posted Apr 28, 2009 4:38 pm GMT

    i.ve had my q6600 quad 2.4mhz overclocked to 3.0ghz for 2 years now and have had no troubles at first i had stock cooler and temps were going up abit to high for me to be happy but i purchased a aftermarket cooler(just make sure it'll fit in your case cause some are huge coolers)after it was installed temps have run well. my advice is to talk on a few forums about overclocking and get to know abit about it before you go changing things, unless you got the money to replace it if you break it. the best i've had my cpu to is 4.5mhz but it was idleing at 70c had to chang it back strait away, when im ready to upgrade my cpu i'll get water cooling and pump it back up and see how long it lasts.

  • St0Ne4Ge

    Posted Apr 27, 2009 3:24 am GMT

    "It ceaps my CPU very cold " wow....just wow.

  • mannigut

    Posted Mar 14, 2009 12:22 pm GMT

    wasn't any helpful

  • kkkudin

    Posted Mar 5, 2009 4:04 am GMT

    make overclocked make your PC durability going down... make sure u use standard specification before your pc going BOOOMMM.... hahahah....

  • Pixy64

    Posted Mar 3, 2009 5:55 am GMT

    I got 4 options, 3%, 5%, 8% and 10% i can't use 8% or 10% cause i get blue screen but now i use 5% more power i got Athlon x2 6000+ 3.1GHz but now with 5% overclock i got Athlon x2 6000+ 3.25GHz

  • shamarke

    Posted Feb 22, 2009 4:59 pm GMT

    i know nothing about "overclocking" i just buy new parts!

  • DarthLinux

    Posted Oct 7, 2008 2:41 pm GMT

    Is it actually worth overclocking a cpu? Will it improve performance by much or will it just screw up your cpu.
    I have a AMD 5600+ X2 2.9ghz Dual Core and I'm wondering if it is really worth risking cpu death for some more power?

  • aura_enchanted

    Posted Sep 19, 2008 9:54 am GMT

    im looking to overclock a pentium d 820 processor (thats the 2.8ghz model). in a stack acer aspier t600 if u want a direct x diag lemme know

  • matthew483

    Posted Sep 23, 2007 7:43 pm GMT

    hey, I'm pretty new to overclocking, im running a stock emachine T3256, I was wondering what speed would be safe to overclock to?

  • unreal_ll417

    Posted May 19, 2007 1:44 pm GMT

    If I overclock my AND duo core 3800+ 2.4 to 2.8 or 3.0 am i going to srcow my CPU up ?
    I have a mini typone CPU fan. It ceaps my CPU very cold

  • airwalk_102

    Posted Apr 8, 2007 7:16 am GMT

    yeah and for abit cheaper you can over clock a intel core 2 duo e4300 to 3.47 with fan cooling and up to i think jus over 3.5 with water cooling which was amazing

  • Norsee

    Posted Mar 10, 2007 1:45 pm GMT

    @ arsefacex:

    I read about overclocking over at IGN, and they gat an E6600 overclocked to 3.4GHz, ON THE FAN INCLUDED TOO! I just thought that was amazing, but i wouldn't recommend trying it with a cheap fan cooling because it might not run for very long.

  • jACkaTacK1107

    Posted Feb 10, 2007 12:28 pm GMT

    any thoughts on the right way to overclock a core 2 duo @ 2.13 GHz using stock air cooling? cuz i dont wanna screw it up obviously lol

  • stuckboy

    Posted Jan 30, 2007 2:21 am GMT

    @m_shameel_14 You are not likely to screw up the hardware unless you crank the voltage. Just do what the article says, edge the FSB up in very small increments until you encounter instabilities. It is also good to check what temperature the processor is running at each time you go into the BIOS, as then you will know if it is hotter than it should be.

    Before you consider overclocking, I would take your PC to bits and suck all the loose dust off it with a vacuum cleaner, then take out all the compnents and individually clean them until you can see your face in them. This can improve cooling considerably.

  • sam03is_

    Posted Oct 18, 2006 3:11 am GMT

    well i suppose i was one of the lcuky one. I just went into a computer shop to get some RAM installed cause i CBF'd doing it myself adn had a chat with the guy about overclocking. Got the PC back and it had a new high powered fan installed and was overclocked and i''ve been a fan of it ever since.

  • SoberWarock

    Posted Sep 6, 2006 11:55 pm GMT

    Damn Im just going to get a core duo

  • behony

    Posted Sep 2, 2006 2:50 pm GMT

    simply DONT do it if you do not know what you are doing!

  • m_shameel_14

    Posted Aug 31, 2006 7:46 am GMT

    i want to overclock my system, but somehow, i think me doing it alone might screw it up. its a p4 2.0 Ghz, on an inel d865perl motherboard. sucks, i know. any tips?

  • possum_lord

    Posted Aug 28, 2006 11:46 am GMT

    I have a 3000 venice and got that to 2.5 on a biostar tforce6100, very good overclocker and cheap at £50, I would reccomend if people are wanting to go a bit more serious then go for an dfi lanparty. for any overclocking help go to http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/

  • DARTHvayda

    Posted Aug 27, 2006 3:41 pm GMT

    s939 Athlon 3000+ venice, 1.8ghz stock to 2.6ghz on stock voltage. 2.5ghz 100%stable

  • SV123

    Posted Aug 23, 2006 6:04 pm GMT

    i have an AMD Athlon 2.6 ghz and i overclocked it to a 3.2 ghz and i think that over clocking is great. i would reccommend to anyone who wants to squeze more performance out of their processor without buying a new processor. but it runs awfully hot though..........................

  • arsefacex

    Posted Aug 23, 2006 10:59 am GMT

    Oh really? SWEET! I can't wait to get an E6600 then! ty

  • n_w95482

    Posted Aug 23, 2006 9:17 am GMT

    You can probably get over 3 GHz on decent air cooling.

  • arsefacex

    Posted Aug 21, 2006 4:14 pm GMT

    So with a water cooling kit, is it alright to oc a E6600 over 3 Ghz?

  • xUndress2Killx

    Posted Aug 21, 2006 11:05 am GMT

    Colcon2000 if u want an AMD anthlon over a Core 2 Duo your very crazy, its teh best proccesor out right now. I think its ideal for gaming.

  • burning_hands

    Posted Aug 20, 2006 1:18 pm GMT

    To anyone thinking about overclocking their PC. The information youve just read are the very basics.
    http://www.short-media.com/review.php?r=300
    /\/\/\/\/\ this link has a complete guide on how to overclock the 754/ 939 platform.
    Its slighly irresponsible of gamespot write this article when it isnt really a complete guide, very brief, they dont even mention memory dividers or LDT which which are both affected when you change the FSB.

    I wonder how many people have read this and just gone and fried their motherboard and cpu....

  • haj01

    Posted Aug 20, 2006 8:21 am GMT

    can u even overclock a intel? or just amd?

  • Popia20

    Posted Aug 20, 2006 1:18 am GMT

    i have a AMD Barton 2500+ and now is an AMD Barton 3200+ 2200MHz .Motherboard is a Asus A7N8X-E Delux.

  • coolcon2000

    Posted Aug 19, 2006 8:01 pm GMT

    Bah, My PC is too rubbish, AMD Athelon, dunno what make though. But Iwant a PC with a AMD Athelon 64 3200+ 512 RAM, and a good Graphics and sound card. But that sometime can be expensive, oh well...

  • Sp4c3r

    Posted Aug 18, 2006 11:04 am GMT

    Have a AMD Athlon 64 3000 + 2000 Mhz @ 2400 Mhz working great only Graphics Card Overclocking wouldn't work

  • scratzin

    Posted Aug 17, 2006 12:40 pm GMT

    I've got two P4's @ 3.0 GHz each under the hood. No need to over clock for me

  • elson0630

    Posted Aug 17, 2006 8:18 am GMT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

  • Skinner_Y2K

    Posted Aug 17, 2006 2:44 am GMT

    Currently running an Opteron 146 @ 2.95Ghz on a DFi UT Sli-D board.

    But keep getting tempted by a lovely Conroe

  • Vauxor

    Posted Aug 17, 2006 1:43 am GMT

    AMD 3800+ Retail: 2000MHz @ 2200MHz @ 1.4v on a ASUS A8N32 SLi Nforce4 board. Very easy overclocking with this board.

  • n_w95482

    Posted Aug 15, 2006 10:15 am GMT

    I don't think he's referring to the socket. He's probably talking about the chipset. Intel does have a bad habit of forcing people to buy the newest, best chipset to use their newest CPUs. I think the C2D's require a 975X board, which are fairly new and expensive. Compare that to pretty much any chipset for Socket 939. Most, if not all, can run chips all the way from S939 Semprons up to a FX-60.

  • Maslowo

    Posted Aug 15, 2006 8:39 am GMT

    Actually, ksa8907 the new intel core2dual is based on the 775 socket design. If you want to get upset about chip designers switching socket design, look to your beloved AMD with there AM2 design.
    I do agree with core2dual being a stupid new, they should use something with a flashy X in the name. What do you think?

  • ksa8907

    Posted Aug 15, 2006 7:38 am GMT

    if anyone knows anything about intel and amd, its that intel operates at a higher speed than AMD, however, AMD has a better layout on the processor allowing it to operate at lower speeds and still outperform intel's higher speeds. So overclocking an AMD does more good than oc'ing an Intel. I do have to say that i was impressed when Intel released the core2duo (a stupid name if i say so myself), because they lowered the operating frequency and now outperform AMD by a considerable amount, but i am very optimistic about the quad-core chips AMD will be releasing at the end of the year, and their new 4x4 technology. If you doubt anything i have writen just research it before you post something trying to bash the truth.
    Also, whenever Intel releases a new chip they change the mobo more often than Micheal Jackson changes diapers, hahaha! whats the point in making a awesome new chip if you have to buy a $200 mobo along with it. Long live socket 939! at least until the quad cores come out ;p

  • niacxxi

    Posted Aug 15, 2006 5:08 am GMT

    Intel rocks! the best gaming CPU is intel no matter what. and you can probe it yourself. compare anything you want doing overclocking and intel will beat AMD on every aspect.

  • Poeticinsomniac

    Posted Aug 15, 2006 3:57 am GMT

    Ok, first unless you have a conroe cpu...intel sucks, has for years. deal with it.

    Upgraded to a dual core in may, back when the AMD dual core 4400x2 and above were still 500-1100 bucks. I opted for a 165 opteron with a toledo core (same core as the FX-60) found the right stepping digging through chips on E-bay. $287 for the cpu, $199 for my DFI LP NF4 SLI Dr-Expert and used my existing OCZ GE VX PC4000 ram (512x4). Added a x1800xtx 512 GDDR3 ATI card for $199. Ended up with:

    memory divider 1:1 =320 HTT, CPU voltage @ 1.425 ram voltage @ 3.6, 2880mhz...on air
    memory timings at 2-2-2-8
    memory divider 166/200 =365 HTT, CPU voltage @ 1.5 ram voltage @ 3.9 3285mhz...on air.
    memory timings at 2.5-2-2-5
    CPU temp doesn't get above 37c under load, maintains 27-28c at idle memory bandwidth is between 8900-9500 mb/s

    End result for about $700 i ended up with a completly new system that outperformed the FX-60 by about 500mhz for $3-400 less then if i just bought an fx-60. Outperforms every other cpu except the conroe's and has better memory performance then the AM2 DDR2. Any other intel chip especially any of the P-4 line it at least performs 40% better. The single ATI x1800xtx has better performance then the majority of the nvidia cards in SLI mode.

    146 opteron with same ram, mother board etc clocked at 3.2ghz on air. That chip cost $90 off ebay.

    Also have gotten a barton mobile 2400+ up to 3047mhz (265x11.5) on a DFI LP Rev B NF2 with same OCZ ram with the aid of OCZ ram booster, 5 other mobile barton chips and a 3200+ xp with locked multi on various boards (epox 8RDA3+, Gigabyte GA700N 400 NF2. DFI ultra infinity, an Abit and several Asus boards as well. all NF2 chipsets) clocked at 2.65ghz-2980ghz on every one of them, Each chip had only a Hefty heatsink, usually a thermaltake tornado or Big Typhoon.

    None of the barton chips required more then 1.875v on the cpu. and all of those chips outperformed P-4, substantially better memory performance then the intel boards with DDR2. From all i've seen intel finally did some work and made a good chip with the conroe, but ill be waiting till january when the quad core 65nm AMD chips come out, 4 cores on a single die i suspect will be a bit more impressive then 2 dual cores in a single package. For now i tend to think of the AM2 chips out now in the same way i think of the 754 socket chips, simply something to bridge the gap between the real products.

  • muppet1010

    Posted Aug 15, 2006 1:45 am GMT

    OCing sounds like a great idea, but im not gonna try it. I have had very little success each time i unscrew the case on my pc. I mean last time i tried to add to extra usb ports i couldn't even do that. They still don't work, so OCing is just a very bad idea for me, it would probably end up with me setting my computer on fire or something(and hence losing a lot more money than i saved).

    But i was wondering if you were to go in to a local smaller pc shop, not like dixons. Do you think that they would be able to do it for me???

  • nsx3000

    Posted Aug 14, 2006 11:48 pm GMT

    Athlon 64 3700+ San Diego at 255 * 11 = 2.8GHz, 1.39V

    Abit KN8 SLI

  • hellogamebot

    Posted Aug 14, 2006 10:57 pm GMT

    how can i o'c my 2.93Mhz intel motherboard with 400 FSB 512MB DDR ram??I have a nvidia 5200Fx graphic card.Anyone ready to help?I am an amateur.

How to overclock your CPU

For this edition of Press Start, we'll get you familiar with the basics of overclocking and explain what kind of equipment you'll need to get started.

Tags