Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»

Three Times

One powerful GPU is enough to render most games at ridiculous frame rates and insane resolutions. When you add two flagship GPUs to a system to make an SLI or Crossfire setup, it's the definition of excess. Triple SLI and Crossfire is (excuse us while we dip into our newspeak dictionary for a word) doubleplusexcess. Everything about three monster GPUs slapped into one system screams it. The frame rates are ridiculous, the power requirements are monumental, the heat is off the charts, and the cost--it falls under one of those "it's better not to ask" scenarios.

CyberPower sent over a system loaded to the hilt for us to check out in just such a configuration. The company had to build a machine capable of handling the immense loads that a triple GPU setup demands. Outside of heat, there were power, noise, and bottlenecking concerns. CyberPower used the sizeable Thermaltake Element V chassis, inside of which it installed one front-mounted 120mm fan for the drives, another in the back for the Asetek CPU water cooler, and a third wrapped around a ducting system that blows directly onto the video cards--an absolute necessity considering that one GeForce GTX 480 almost runs hot enough to boil water. On the side panel of the Thermaltake Element V sits a gigantic 230mm fan that blows directly onto the GPUs. An excellent cabling job keeps air flow unimpeded throughout the case. To make sure that the GPUs weren't bottlenecked by other hardware, CyberPower pushed the 3.33GHz flagship Intel Core i7 980X processor up to 4.2GHz and paired it with 6GB of 1600MHz Kingston HyperX DDR3 memory. On the storage side, there was a speedy 128GB Kingston SSD paired with a secondary 2TB drive for extra space. A massive 1,000-watt Corsair power supply feeds the rig with energy. Everything totals up to $4,500, which amounts to a princely sum but one heck of a machine.

The 6       CyberPower       Big fan!       Internals       Stacked       H20       1KW      

Noise

Firing up the system for the first time, we were expecting something along the lines of a mild tornado or, at the very least, a vacuum cleaner. Surprisingly, the machine didn't emit more noise than your average computer when browsing the Web. In our air-conditioned offices, running the machine at full tilt didn't generate jet engine levels of noise, but it was enough to get our notice.

Heat

Triple SLI vs Triple Crossfire

(Shorter bars indicate better performance)

Operating Temperature (Celsius)

3x GeForce GTX 480 Peak
93
3x GeForce GTX 480 Idle
61
3x Radeon HD 5870 Peak
86
3x Radeon HD 5870 Idle
61

With the system configured the way it was--three side-to-side GPUs--we thought there would be more cause for alarm. In our earlier testing with the GeForce GTX 480, we pushed a single GPU well into the 90-degree Celsius range. Of course, we were also testing on an open-air test bed, which doesn't benefit from the well-routed air flow that a solid case design offers.

Despite all of the cooling efforts, we still saw high temperatures: 93 degrees. But that was with three GeForce GTX 480s in there and running for hours on end. We saw slightly lower temperature levels with three Radeon HD 5870s. Three power-hungry GPUs jammed into the space of a toaster are bound to cause trouble.

The machine can live in a well-cooled area, but we'd hesitate to recommend using it in a room with no air conditioning, and we definitely wouldn't recommend running it in the dead of summer. Of course, if you have nearly $5,000 to spend on a computer, it's likely you're not skimping on air conditioning. After multiple hours of testing on both setups, we would see the occasional graphical glitch or corrupted texture, which went away if we simply let the GPUs cool down a bit. The cooldown is relatively quick and probably took no longer than 10 to 20 seconds once all graphical load was gone.

Complexity

Running two GPUs in a system is complicated, but adding a third and possibly a fourth doesn't help matters. In testing both setups, we encountered our fair share of anomalies; quirks that one might expect from being on the bleeding edge. But they certainly weren't something anyone would be thrilled about after spending more than $1,500 on the GPUs alone.

With triple Crossfire, we could not get Eyefinity working with all three cards enabled in Crossfire mode, leaving us to game on a single monitor. The moment we disabled triple Crossfire mode, we regained the ability to play on multiple monitors. We imagine ATI will address this in time. Until then, it's certainly not a great reason to grab three of these cards. We did get Eyefinity working with two GPUs, though.

On the Nvidia side, the company has yet to enable 3D Vision Surround, a feature that requires SLI. The company aims to enable this feature with the next release of its 256 driver, which should occur at the end of June. 3D Vision Surround enables multimonitor gaming, as well as 3D, which requires special monitors and Nvidia's 3D glasses.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
SPBoss 5 pts

how about tri-sli, with a gtx 590 vs ati 6990 6 gpu cores would produce some insane results!

Jesin_A 5 pts

Wonderful article you could've added nvidia 3D vision to this test and also a video of the mammoth machine

Artas1984 5 pts

This is a PC for Chuck Norris, but only a temporary..

Artas1984 5 pts

Which means that Metro 2033 is badly optimized

Reuwsaat 137 pts

wow you need 3x SLi GTX 480 to run it at 60fps that metro game o.o

coaltango 5 pts

Nvidia has significantly lost alot of market share. coz ATI stepped up the game with huge uppercuts & a massive bang for the buck

mrwmom 5 pts

this is a completely unfair test, they used a card from last year by ATI VS. the card from this year by Nvidia. They should have put the HD5970 vs the GTX480, but they didn't because they knew that ATI's card would then win. yes I know that the HD5970 came out before the GTX480

andrew_ribbons 5 pts

"I wouldn't say that test is not entirely fair, I say that IS NOT FAIR AT ALL!!! \$300 is what? little diference?" Yes true, but the performance boost you pay for small amounts once you get up into Flagship territory are long estabilished, and people paying this amount will probably not flinch as much at $300 considering the preformance boost is there, even if small. Both ATI and Nvidia both have respectable and considerable offerings at the moment, there is no current weak party. Great choice for PC Gamers!

feirasboy 5 pts

Well the Nvidia SLI as a better performance thats right! I've done averages in % and from 1x GTX480 to 2X GTX480 the gain in FPS is 97%(average) but from 2 to a 3rd card the gain its only 22%(average) note that the 2nd game Tom Clancy's HAWX the FPS gain to a 2nd Nvidia in that game is a udge boost of 135%. As for the ATI HD 5870 the gain is 62% (average) to a 2nd card and 45% (average) to a 3rd card. I think that AMD needs to work more on the crossfirex. Not talking bad about ATI i personaly chose ATI GPU's and AMD CPU's and as the reviewer says "The matchup is also not entirely fair because the GeForce 480 GTX costs $100 more per card" so thats a triple SLI system $300 more expencive then that triple Crossfirex system. I wouldn't say that test is not entirely fair, I say that IS NOT FAIR AT ALL!!! $300 is what? little diference?

testament1234 5 pts

I bet this machine could resurrect a dead person, then again what a magnificent piece of art...o_O

mcmike1942 5 pts

I love my 5870, and I wish I had the money to spend on the computer I really want. Forget consoles, microsoft is being lazy just trying to suck out as much money on the 360, that they can. While ATI and Nvidia try to advance technology as much as they can. Thank god for overclockers, otherwise we might all be using macs.

ad_rock 5 pts

console gamers are just to lazy or ADD to learn how to build a PC so they buy a junkbox. Half of these kids couldn't even get online if it wasn't for their iphones

lcdcc 5 pts

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

BlueShark1 6 pts

Two thumbs up from an overclocker ;) (@ made_u_look and killing_spree20 ) and over \\$5 grand in my system, not because I had to, but because I chose to.

killing_spree20 5 pts

@made_u_look That is exactly it!!! Console gamers just don't get that there are two sides of PC gaming, there are the games and there is the PC itself. It's such a good hobby. Nearly everyday day some new piece of interesting tech comes out to learn about. And the tweaking? I love it. I guess most people would find it boring, but it is really satisfying knowing you've got every last ounce of power out of a piece of hardware. Plus the cases are so much nicer than the console boxes.

made_u_look 7 pts

You have no idea what your talking about. You assume you hafe to buy a whole new system at once or all 3 gpus a once or my ps3/360 is uber better because I spend less money than stupid PC owner pwnt. Ok PC enthusiasts make this there Hobby alot of us have our own communities specializing on certain types of these areas go to overclock.net and you can see guys that build cases from bottom up, people that spend hours playing with memory timings, playing with CPU timings, Overclocking there GPU. I mean where do you come off comparing a box with components you can't even name to a PC, where our community actually matters. I mean just as the modders who mod for games like Fallout 3, Sims, the people that make the machinima. Its like having a hobby working on cars why would you put a blower or a turbo in car to go faster but its redundant you can break the speed limit, well guess what some people do. I mean complaining about the electric bill seriously? God these arguements are all flawed go on a ps3/360 article a spew your nonsense there.

lcdcc 5 pts

cant believe codemasters was a spectrum buget game company back in the day and now their sitting on the most prIzed engine LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

lcdcc 5 pts

profileap600 lack of games is in the change for pc games with codemasters

lcdcc 5 pts

gerado ur in for a shock on dx 11 64 bit program with ur rig

lcdcc 5 pts

the beauty of the f1 engine, defined, it has a massive scale for interpretation which means anything can be done on it, the f1 engine can make any game..... f1 engine powers most games for an era. ea which has been a massive dominent force has the f1 programmers which pass on the most technically advanced data eas f1 engine from 2002 has been obvious to see throughout all there games with progression. the amount of physics and elements running simutainously in the f1 engine powers forces unknown. ive had a few beers but aircraft and f1 and rockets and bullets help us understand our surroundings and forces BUT more programming has been done in f1 than tubulence force feedback in a jet fighter plane in games. FORCE FEEDBACK IS ONLY SO ADVANCED IN F1 ENGINES. FOLLOW THE F1 ENGINE IN GAMING CODEMASTERS ARE SET TO RULE AN ERA.

lcdcc 5 pts

lol where u lot been on the pc racing genre... ever heard of rfactor lol thats where the f1 engine has been mainly focused for the last five years as well as a hundred mods of all motorsports. when CODEMASTERS DIRECT X 11 F1 2010 comes along its game over, all modders will be here from karting to lemans to mini coopers to lambourginis one of the best rfactor mods which is free is well there s a few F1RFT 2009 , almost made 2010 mod.. F1 WPC 2009, THERES SO MANY MODS FOR RFACTOR...... when it comes to motorsport on pc u have to follow the f1 engine modders the eas 2002 last engine made race on, gtr, rfactor, need for speed, the modders mainly went to RFACTOR for the last five years after they give up on f1 challenge, simbin racing brought out gtr and race from eas engine, if u havnt been involved in rfactor u havnt been involved in pc racing.... grid and dirt are just the beggining for f1 2010 from codemasters. this will set the mark way and above anything u a have ever seen or experienced. once f1 from codematers comes out all modders will make any motorsport from the engine if codemasters dont charge too much. like i said the reason pc doesnt have anything spectacular in racing for is sonys fualt they bought the license of the f1 engine and didnt make a pc version. 8 YEARS PC OWNERS HAVE SUFFERED FROM SONY. DISS PS3 I GOT ONE AS WELL!!!!!!!!!!!! CODEMASTERS LEAD THE WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GabrielOnuris 16 pts

@profileap600 Point taken; I don't play sims racing at all, but what about Dirt and Grid? If I would start to play this genre, I would start with them... It's like those anime-RPG games for PS1, 2 and 3; they are exclusives, most of them probably are good, but I can happy live without them. And yes, PC used to has more exclusive games, now they are few. I can remember Witcher, Crysis 1, Diablo (Mac too, I know), and some others unsuccess titles. I'm adept of multiplatform games, why to grant someone with candies, and others don't?!

666shan666 5 pts

@MagicTestacle buy GTS250 & above for nvidia & 5750 & above for ATI. I'd prefer ATI. also make sure your power supply supports these cards. Just an advice.

Gerardo1963 5 pts

@ jeremiahl Your absolutely right! I to spend a fair amount of time researching all the components that go into building a rig! I used to be an owner of a 2,000 dollar gaming rig i built and after time i realized what a waist of money it had become! You can build a rig for around 800 dollars and have equal if not better benchmarks then a couple grand machine! That build had an i7 processor and a GTX 285 but im working on a new build but this time with an ATI gpu and an AMD cpu! I kept 6 gigs of G skill ram from my last build so thats a hundred something less i have to pay for! =D

profileap600 5 pts

@GabrielOnuris - I am not on any side of this argument. I would like to point out though that as a pc gamer I do feel I have a lack of games. On consoles their are simulation racing games such as Forza 3 and the upcoming Gran Turismo 5. On pc some would say we have GTR2 or Race On, which I personally think are garbage. My point is I think that pc gaming pretty much has no good simulation racing.

ad_rock 5 pts

yes, if you run an excessive OS then this excessive rig might not seem ridiculous...but it is

lcdcc 5 pts

tabaski what windows u running on 32 bit xp? if so u might think that the tech is far beyond the game, but if u are running direct x 11 games on windows7 64 bit then its not ridiculous...

GabrielOnuris 16 pts

@goubagouba "poor pc gamers", and "lack of games"? Come on, are you serious? All the platforms has its good amount of games, exclusive or not; by now, what about Crysis 2, Deus Ex - Human Evolution, Diablo 3, Transformers - War for Cybertron, Metro 2033, The Sims 3, and so on, so on, so on... The only console exclusive game that makes me want to play is the Mortal Kombat series, nevertheless because I used to play them in my childhood on the Snes, Master System and Arcade either, and now I'm 26 years old and miss those moments. It is NOT a point, and you doesn't make any sense at all. @killing_spree20 @NeilCardiff LoL, I though the same as killing_spree20, I was even about to write something against NeilCardiff too!! =p Then I paid more attention, looked at the NeilCardiff profile and reviews, and I concluded he is indeed a PC gamer, and something was real wrong...! Well, we all make mistakes once in a while!

MagicTestacle 5 pts

I just want to know which GPU should I buy to get smooth gameplay on a 1920*1080 23" screen. Now I have the 8600GTX 512MB and I was happy for 2 years. It changed... I can play most games out there, but at a heavy graphical cost...

fzd88 12 pts

It's not about wasting money. It's about the entertainment value you get back by running games at max setting + max resolution. I used to play most games at 1440x900 @ medium setting - it was the only way to get 60+ fps on my older machine. At the time, i thought everything was perfect and ideal. Until an Alienware showed up at the door... Playing games on high setting/resolution/sound + smooth fps is a COMPLETELY different experience. The best way to describe it is like watching a mega-blockbuster movie at home on a 15" TV (and on VHS tape) verses going to a decked out movie theater with a huge HD screen and awesome sound. So despite the movie itself being the same, the experience is dramatically different. At the end of the day, gameplay is suppose to be the key. But i don't think that's no longer true. The graphics, sounds, details, etc. are just as important in today's games - they are part of the whole experience. If you takes those factors out, then you are missing 50% of the game. And on-top of that, there's no need to tweak or play around with settings to squeeze higher FPS (which can really distract you from enjoying the game...quit, tweak, check fps, tweak, check, etc.) With a high-end machine, just max out the sliders and enjoy....

666shan666 5 pts

@shawnanthony it is actuly difficult to max out some games at 1080p. PC's have many many graphic options. & now with tessellation & advanced DOF, almost impossible using these with max AA. look at example of just cause 2 & metro 2033 above in 1 card configs. hell crysis dont play maxed out on most systems ( i mean with descent frame-rate all along). My pc plays most games maxed out at 1080p too( with the exception of crysis, crysis warhead & metro 2033 in which i have to use 0 AA & no advanced DOF), & I am proud of that.

shawnanthony 8 pts

lol @ NeilCardiff : good call @ Killing_spree20 perhaps he should re-frame from blogging, lmao and uh... maxed at 1080?!?!?! lol that is just funny you are proud of that for pc gaming... good luck fiends.

killing_spree20 5 pts

@NeilCardiff. Fair play. I stand corrected. However only I was mentioned and quoted, so I'm sure you can see where the misunderstanding occured? All the same appologies are in order. I'm sorry for flying off the handle at you.

NeilCardiff 162 pts

@ killing_spree20 It seems obvious to me and probably anyone else with a passable understanding of the English language that my comment was not aimed at you. It was a sarcastic dig at goubagouba with reference to the sentence quoted. Before you go crying to the moderators I suggest you pull your neck in and read my comment again. PS try and get a sense of humour while you're at it.

killing_spree20 5 pts

@NeilCardiff. What exactly am I supposed to be jealous of? My PC is fine, it runs everything maxed at 1920x1080. So nothing to be jealous of there. Am I jealous of people with consoles? No, because I'm all fingers rather than thumbs, probably comes from 10 years of learning to play progressive metal on guitar, (The real thing, not the game) so the mouse + keyboard just suits me better, and I'm terrible with controllers for anything other than Racing and the odd flight game. As to you inferences of rage and homosexuality...wow? You got that from a tiny post about the stupidity of one persons choice of words? As for chosing that particular quote, I don't understand your point. Why would the fact that I really don't care if people would rather play games on a PS3 or 360 or PC make me either angry, jealous or gay I could infer from your post that perhaps the reason you question others sexuality is because, in reality, you are uncomfortable with your own? And anger from impotence? Are you actually just lashing out at others because of your own condition? Maybe. The fact that you brought the subjects up, when I mentioned nothing of them suggests that perhaps you are the one with the problems, and like many troubled internet souls, you feel the need to superimpose your issues on to other people to make you feel better about yourself? Of course it would be quite stupid of me to try and diagnose you from a few short lines of text on a game websites forum, would it not?

NeilCardiff 162 pts

That loud whirring sound isn't coming from all the fans it's from the numbers on the freaking electric meter.

NeilCardiff 162 pts

@killing_spree20 "Honestly, I don't care what you game on. So why do you care what I game on? " I'm tempted to suspect rage through impotence and repressed homosexuality but it's more likely just a bad case of the green eyed monster.

killing_spree20 5 pts

@goubagouba........'poor pc gamers' Now that is seriously funny...using the word 'poor' in conjunction with a $3000 gaming rig...funny stuff. Maybe you'd like to rephrase that to 'PC gamers that did well at school and college, got good jobs and earn good money like to spend it on more than plastic toys that parents buy for their kids.' Probably closer to the mark. Honestly, I don't care what you game on. So why do you care what I game on?

tabaski 5 pts

I still have my 260 216 and it does the job. The tech is way ahead of the games coming out, it's ridiculous. Although, if you game on one of those projection monitors, then maybe it's worth it =/

666shan666 5 pts

@SimpJee because of the reason mentioned a few posts earlier by me... 666shan666 Posted Jun 8, 2010 5:47 am GMT Its not possible to use three HD5970 in crossfire as crossfire can only use 4 processors & two HD5970 will already have 4 processors. that is why there is only one crossfire port on a 5970.

lcdcc 5 pts

i got a good pc i7 running at 3.9, 4.1 turbo, watercooled on windows 7, 1 gpu 5870 ati, 6gig 1600 gdr3 ram, antec 1200 case 1000watt power and i can honestly say i want more power! lol cant afford2 gpu cards at the moment but definately want and need it. running the dx11 games the main 2 at the moment bad company 2 and dirt 2 they run good in 1900 1200 res maxed out but not great. I bought this pc ready for the game i been waiting for now for 8 years! a new F1 engine from codemasters, simply cannot wait after playing the ea engine in various forms and mods from 2002! ever since sony robbed pc gamers, hats off to the tech people who keep pushing the boundries because with these experiments were not playing zx81 s or spectrums anymore! my pc cost 1200 quid custom built and i have ps3 and an xbox and any one whos serious about f1 simulators just simply could not accept the ps3 or xbox for such a game, as dx 9 is just not realistic enough. F1 2010 from codemasters in directx 11 is simply going to be sensational. it is so techinically advanced for this engine that most games in the form of driving will be modelled around this engine for the next 5 years and hopefully the pure techs from codemasters will just keep pushing it. ex f1 driver anthony davison cant put into words how amazing this game will be on pc AS HE HAS HELPED TO MAKE THE GAME.............BRING IT ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PC OWNS BY 2X DIRECT X LEVELS FROM CONSOLE...... THATS WHERE UR MONEY IS...AND DX 12 AROUND THE CORNER....

TN101 5 pts

Just ordered my first (of 2 likely) 480 last night!. akiel, some can (and do). Only 1% or so of the gaming/enthusiast community buy an SLI or xfire setup like the ones above. It's pricey but awesome if you can afford it. jeremiahl...not even close (cheaper yes) but 2560x1600 would smash that rig. Several current games will struggle at 1920x1200...bottleneck is in the GPU. BUT, true on the CPU post. You don't need an extremely fast (or OCed) quad or hexa core until you start running tri SLI/Xfire setups like the ones listed above(though i would recomend a fast quad for a dual card setup just to be sure). If you tried to pair a triple GPU solution with a weak processor, the CPU can't keep them fed. LeadnSteal, people with jobs that like computers. AdamK...right on.

zer0xi0n 5 pts

@goobyman Heh, that or the sith pope would pull out his light saber on you.

666shan666 5 pts

@Xenon752 Its not possible to use three HD5970 in crossfire as crossfire can only use 4 processors & two HD5970 will already have 4 processors. that is why there is only one crossfire port on a 5970.

akieal 5 pts

"un-realistic for 99% of people" as quoted by Benny_a. yeah it really annoys me, the fact that this functionality is made available by ATI and Nvidia, only to tease us, as in all reality it cannot be used by anyone, and the cost is just too much, given next month there will be a new card.

Conversation powered by Livefyre

Top GameSpot Recommendations