If you bought a new video card two or three years ago, you've probably noticed that newer games aren't running as well right out of the box. Those GeForce 7900 and Radeon X1900 cards were fantastic when they were new, but game developers have caught up with more power-hungry graphics effects. Frame rates have started to dip, and you might have had to reduce the game-resolution and image-quality settings to get system performance up to acceptable levels. Lowering the image quality isn't a desirable long-term solution, so it's probably time to upgrade that video card.

We've gathered together a collection of video cards currently available online in the $150 to $250 price range. We originally planned to make $200 the hard price ceiling, but we found the ATI Radeon HD 4870 and the GeForce GTX 260 Core 192 sitting just above the cap and we had to get them into the comparison because both cards offer a considerable amount of graphics performance. Note that you'll find a lot of these cards priced far above our estimated street pricing, but we used the lowest prices we could find at major online retailers for our estimates. These basic video card packages generally ship without a pack-in game, so if you see a card at a much higher price, check to see if it comes with a game bundle such as Far Cry 2.

These cards aren't the top-of-the-line performance champions, but they'll have enough power to get you through a couple more years of PC gaming, and you can put the money you save on the video card toward buying more games and paying for that massively multiplayer online habit.

GeForce GTX 260 Core 192

The original GeForce GTX 260 that Nvidia launched in June 2008 came with 192 processing cores and a $399 price tag. Nvidia had to lower the GTX 260's price to $299 after AMD released the highly affordable ATI Radeon HD 4870. Later in the year, Nvidia started shipping an improved GeForce GTX 260 with 216 processing cores.

Cards based on this new GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 GPU are selling for $299. The problem is that the video card makers still have a lot of the original 192-core GeForce GTX 260 chips to unload. The GeForce GTX 260 is the most expensive card in our roundup, coming it at $229, but it has a lot of firepower and is considerably more affordable than it was just a few months ago.

Est. Retail Price: $229

ATI Radeon HD 4870

The ATI Radeon HD 4870 is the second $299 card that's starting to approach the magical $200 price point. Its closest competitor is the GeForce GTX 260, which has a slight edge in frame rates and in games with PhysX support, but the Radeon has a few features that make it attractive for PC owners looking for a balance between gaming and utility. That's not saying that the card isn't good for gaming.

The Radeon HD 4870 can run all the latest games at high resolution thanks to its 800 stream processing units and GDDR5 memory, but the card is also great for PC game enthusiasts looking for home-theater support. The card supports full HDMI output with 7.1 surround sound.

Est. Retail Price: $219

ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2

The ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 is a dual-GPU card from the previous graphics generation. We included the card in our comparison because you will still find it online at close to $200, but you'd be wise to avoid buying one of these cards new because the Radeon HD 4870 has made them obsolete. The Radeon HD 3870 X2 comes with 640 stream processors, 320 from each onboard GPU, but that's well below the 4870's stream processor count, and the 3870 X2 card also uses slower GDDR3 memory.

Est. Retail Price: $219

GeForce 9600 GT SLI

The dual-card value proposition Nvidia and AMD have tried to sell us with SLI and CrossFire is that you can buy a card now and add a second one later if you need more power. The only problem with that argument is that if you wait more than a year to buy that second card, chances are you'd be able to buy a completely new card that's more powerful than two of the old cards put together. The cost of the new card would of course be more expensive than the older card, which would likely have dropped in price, but the performance gap between a new card and an older SLI setup makes the decision to complete the matching set a bittersweet choice. The main benefit is that if you've already sunk your money into a single GeForce 9600 GT card, spending another $100 on a second card will get your system's graphics performance close to what you'd get with a single $200 card.

Est. Retail Price: $200 ($100x2)

GeForce 9800 GTX+

The GeForce 9800 GTX+ leads the trio of cards under $200 for players who can't justify reaching for the GeForce GTX 260 or ATI Radeon HD 4870. Nvidia introduced the GeForce 9800 GTX+ this summer around the time AMD launched its Radeon HD 4800-series GPUs. The GeForce 9800 GTX+ has the same number of processors as the regular GeForce 9800 GTX, but has higher clocks speeds thanks to a smaller manufacturing process. Moving down from 65nm to 55nm allowed Nvidia to increase core clock speeds from 675MHz to 738MHz and shader speeds from 1690MHz to 1836MHz. The GTX+ originally sold for $229, but the price has drifted down as the prices of more powerful cards have also moved down.

Est. Retail Price: $189

GeForce 9800 GTX

A $20 price difference might not seem like a big deal at the high end where cards can cost $400 or more, but the price difference becomes more important when card prices get below $200 and a $20 difference can mean more than 10 percent of the cost of the card.

The GeForce 9800 GTX may be slower than the GTX+, but some people might be willing to give up 9 percent in performance for a more affordable card. Adventurous card owners can also try overclocking to recoup the lost performance.

Est. Retail Price: $169

ATI Radeon HD 4850

It seems unfair to stick the ATI Radeon HD 4850 into the same comparison as the Radeon HD 4870, but we found several 4850 cards floating in the $159 to $185 price range. The Radeon HD 4850 has 800 stream processors, just like the Radeon HD 4870, but it has a slower core clock, 625MHz compared to 750MHz on the 4870, and comes with only GDDR3 memory. All of the multimedia features, including high-definition video playback and HDMI output support, are the same, but the differences in core clock speeds and memory bandwidth make the 4870 a better choice for games.

Est. Retail Price: $169

337 Comments

  • Malganis1111

    Posted Jun 8, 2009 1:59 pm PT

    because AMD owns ati, or you could say there the same besic company, amd makes the processors and ati makes the video cards

  • shani_boy101

    Posted May 12, 2009 12:22 am PT

    why do they keep saying AMD (which makes processors) instead of ATI???

  • a_mop265

    Posted Apr 6, 2009 12:57 pm PT

    also they forgot about the Crossfire Hd 4830 two of those card can kill the gtx 280 espicall in COD4

  • a_mop265

    Posted Apr 6, 2009 12:56 pm PT

    theclown24:
    yes there are some Hd4870 here in the states you can find some for about \$185 sometimes you just have to look around i think H.I.S and saphire have 1 model for that price

  • TheClown24

    Posted Mar 17, 2009 3:21 pm PT

    wish i could find a 4870 for that price, they are £200 as far as i can tell

  • fires99

    Posted Mar 9, 2009 11:44 pm PT

    750i FTW Nvidia Motherboard, e8400 dual core, 1 gtx 260 216 and i slaped 4gigs of 1066 memory on my rig. Cheap and efficient running crysis everything on high with 4X AA 1680X1050 resolution with 35-40 fps.

  • FstrthnU

    Posted Feb 1, 2009 9:28 pm PT

    Asus P5E3 is a good motherboard; also, does anybody know when ATIis going to release the succesor to the ATI Radeon 4870X2, since the GTX 295 owns it badly?

  • never-named

    Posted Jan 19, 2009 5:50 am PT

    How would a Radeon HD 4650 fare against most modern games out today (e.g. Fallout 3, GTA IV)?

  • silva112

    Posted Jan 15, 2009 5:58 pm PT

    Try :http://www.scorptec.com.au/systems/create/ Its the biggest Australian online computer store and its got some great bargains, I got a 1TB (1000 GB's) Seagate hard drive for only \$200!

  • maliGGs

    Posted Jan 11, 2009 1:13 am PT

    thanks robbie_sla & g3n3r41xan for your help, I'm gonna go for the GTX+ as I'm hoping not to upgrade again for about 18 months

  • g3n3r41xan

    Posted Jan 10, 2009 7:05 pm PT

    @killik_123
    depends what you are using AMD or Intel
    also depends what your budget is because motherboards can vary a lot in price.

  • killik_123

    Posted Jan 10, 2009 12:10 pm PT

    any body got any mother boards to recomend???

  • willie1963

    Posted Jan 8, 2009 6:21 pm PT

    if your looking for a good card try online at http://www.newegg.com or http://www.tigerdirect.com/

  • PcGaming

    Posted Jan 7, 2009 10:45 pm PT

    is it worth to upgrade my 9800gt to a 4850 or not

  • killik_123

    Posted Jan 7, 2009 7:59 pm PT

    mattwbrad the costs were only estimated and you never know where they may have found one but still good point (same thing w the Radeon HD 4870)

  • killik_123

    Posted Jan 7, 2009 7:57 pm PT

    i'm not sure about the Geforce 8600GT danyatkinson cuz i cant find it at any stores so i think i'm going to stick with the radeons but there either too expensive or they're mediocre anbody know any where with a good deal in canada?

  • Y3arZer0

    Posted Jan 7, 2009 6:09 pm PT

    I think i'll stick with my 2 geforce 9400gt's. 1gig of video each is nothing to complain about lol.

  • killik_123

    Posted Jan 7, 2009 5:50 pm PT

    i can't even find the ATI Radeon HD 4870 at any stores
    does anybody know about any good deals??

  • killik_123

    Posted Jan 7, 2009 5:45 pm PT

    ithink im going to get the Radeon HD4850 512MB but im not sure if i should

  • vinnym26

    Posted Jan 7, 2009 4:25 pm PT

    buy a top gaming pc here
    http://stores.ebay.co.uk/VJM-COMPUTERS

  • sunnyxsniper

    Posted Jan 7, 2009 4:15 pm PT

    I plan on building a new computer in the near future. I plan on having an i7 cpu with Corsair Core i7 Dominator 6GB DDR3 RAM on vista ultimate. I want a Nvidia video card, but what one do you think is the best choice? (SLI is okay too....)

  • mattwbrad

    Posted Jan 7, 2009 1:36 pm PT

    Where did Gamespot get their cost for a GTX 260? \$229 is not the cost of that card. The only one I found on NewEgg.com was one made by MSI and that was the absolute lowest cost model. The average cost of a GeForce GTX 260 on the site is \$296.75. With tax and standard shipping from NewEgg, you'd end up paying \$329.46, \$100 cheaper than what Gamespot posted.

  • ajmal21382003

    Posted Jan 7, 2009 11:02 am PT

    i have an 8600 gt and runs all the games. can any one tell me what should i buy next (my moherboard is dg 965ss. and i have a dual core 3.0 processor with 2 gb ddr2 ram).guys please recommend a card that can run all the latest games at least at medium graphics.............in need of advice

  • silverstone_911

    Posted Jan 7, 2009 10:21 am PT

    lordminhaz take the nvidia it backs u up a long way trust me

  • hairybeanbag

    Posted Jan 7, 2009 10:05 am PT

    I'll keep my Nvidia geforce 9600 gt

  • papadopoulos02

    Posted Jan 7, 2009 8:58 am PT

    i bought gtx260 core 216 with 4 gb ram at 1066 and a Q9550 overclocked to 3GHz i think its a very good upgrade that i did

  • lordminhaz

    Posted Jan 7, 2009 6:32 am PT

    I am looking to upgrade my pc could anyone suggest which is better for gaming ATI or NVIDIA?? how much ram would i need to play some of the recent games at high quality ??

  • g3n3r41xan

    Posted Jan 6, 2009 8:04 pm PT

    @maliGGs
    I have the 9800GTX+ and I can vouch for it that its a good card but in terms of price/performance the 9800GT wins.
    you get only an average of 10fps more with the 9800GTX+ over the 9800GT.
    but its hard to tell you what to get because your overall PC components can effect the overall performance.

  • k4m1l

    Posted Jan 6, 2009 2:42 pm PT

    http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=4209965&CatId=3585
    Great 9800 GT only 119.99 I'm planning on picking it up in the next few weeks.

    Bought a 8600 from tigerdirect recently runs games very well and it was only 80 dollars, it even runs gta 4 on medium.

  • daverm52

    Posted Jan 6, 2009 2:39 pm PT

    don't buy another 8600, i had an sli setup, bought one gtx+ and its WAY better than the two 8600's

  • stylish1

    Posted Jan 6, 2009 2:34 pm PT

    I was once a Geforce die hard until I got plauged by graphics problems and the blue screen of death. I then tried ATI and will NEVER go back to Geforce. The ATI HD 4850 is great can play all games even GTA IV straight outa the box with normal screen rez. Join the ATI/AMD side and see the light

  • zvodnik

    Posted Jan 6, 2009 11:03 am PT

    Can anyone tell me what is better?
    Should i buy another GeForce 8600 GTS and have SLI or should i consider buying something new?
    Tnx

  • PHeMoX

    Posted Jan 6, 2009 9:29 am PT

    :
    Quite strange that I invest on last-gen hardwares, but as long as I am satisfied with the games I am playing with, I won't think of a videocard that won't benefit my needs.


    It ís strange, because for the same price of a 3870, you can get a nice 4870 card nowadays, which is much faster!

    Of course, some people might have to upgrade their motherboard also... and that might cost you a little bit more. The gap between both generations is huge when it comes to performance though, so it's totally worth the cost!

  • robbie_sla

    Posted Jan 6, 2009 3:25 am PT

    maliGGs, i wouldn't get a flat 9800, they really dont compare to the gtx's. personal oppinion here.

  • g3n3r41xan

    Posted Jan 6, 2009 1:58 am PT

    for those that say these are expensive.
    get the 9600GT for \$100. now thats not expensive and you wont be disappointed in the card.
    I have friends that have the 9600GT and they are really happy with the performance they are getting and the price they have paid.
    The 9600GT beats the 8600GT in the price/performance ratio.

  • bodyhugger79

    Posted Jan 5, 2009 6:56 pm PT

    I am still satisfied with my GeForce 8600GT 256MB (Overclocked Version) but if my budget permits me to purchase a new card, I rather get GeForce 9800GT or ATI HD3870 with 512MB version. Quite strange that I invest on last-gen hardwares, but as long as I am satisfied with the games I am playing with, I won't think of a videocard that won't benefit my needs.

    Games played on my machine:
    GRID, Need for Speed series, NBA2K9, Two Worlds, Oblivion, Call of Duty 4, Call of Duty 5, Medal of Honor: Airborne, Gears of War, Crysis, Crysis Warhead, Warcraft III, Red Alert 3, Devil May Cry 3, Devil May Cry 4, and many more...

    Do I have to upgrade? I think Processor + Videocard balancing should be allocated in order to maximize their capabilities. Maybe in less half a year, prices will drop to \$100+ range. And another generation will be published to the market and delivers "BEST PERFORMANCE". A non-stop upgrade...

  • maliGGs

    Posted Jan 5, 2009 6:35 pm PT

    Anyone want to help me make my mind up between the Asus 9800GT and the GTX+, I'm not sure if the GTX+ is worth the extra \$100, the GT is \$219 and the GTX+ is \$319. Both cards are 512mb

  • anim810

    Posted Jan 5, 2009 4:24 pm PT

    true about the 8800gtx

    i have two OC versions of the card (BFG) with 768 per card and they fly through most games...unsure why anyone would buy any brand as the cards are guaranteed not to fry FOR LIFE. ive bought sli cards since their inception, starting with my old voodoo setup back in '83/'84 i think it was...

    people just gotta read more reviews before buying, ive never had a problem reading the trends in the gcard market...just keep your eyes peeled and check more than 2 sites for reviews and you'll be ok...anyone that doesnt do their homework deserves an early pny 8300 for a hundred bucks lol

    personally im selling my sli cards and getting a 1gb 280 xxx, cause i like it...it'll be sli too!

  • Mr_NoName111

    Posted Jan 5, 2009 2:01 pm PT

    @ moonunitenar. You must play at 1024x768 if you can max farcry 2 and fallout 3 with a 8600GT. lol. Either that, or you have a tolerence for 10fps. Also, about buying last gen cards and upgrading more often, look at the 8800GTX. It came out in 2006, and even today it is faster than mainstream cards like the 8800GT, 8800GTS, 9600GT. If you think about it, someone who bought the 8800GTX has enjoyed good performance for more than 2 years, and will continue to. Worth the extra money if you ask me.

  • Killer_73

    Posted Jan 5, 2009 11:35 am PT

    what they gonna make after 9 series...........

  • Merc816

    Posted Jan 5, 2009 10:32 am PT

    Look on ebay for a reasonable price range( cards over \$200) for a video card or what you see here.

  • Hekynn

    Posted Jan 5, 2009 6:38 am PT

    Lol well there is the GTX295 coming out with the 2 260's in one video card I'm sooo gonna get that after my laptop be a huge upgrade from a 8800GT =D

  • dannyatkinson

    Posted Jan 4, 2009 10:17 pm PT

    moonunitenar . There you go making sense again.

  • moonunitenar

    Posted Jan 4, 2009 7:32 pm PT

    I think it's ridiculous to spend hundreds of dollars every few months to keep a beast of a graphics card. I have a GeForce 8600GT which I got for 90$, and a core 2 quad 6600 processor, and I can still run games like Fallout 3, Far Cry 2, Call Of Duty 4, etc, at high settings. Even Crysis at medium. If you do the math, it's cheaper to buy a last-gen card and upgrade more often than to buy a new expensive card, and replace it with another brand new one slightly less often.

  • vufor

    Posted Jan 4, 2009 11:52 am PT

    I would definitely go for another 9800 GTX card in SLi which would increase performance and quality

  • jstaguy

    Posted Jan 4, 2009 9:57 am PT

    I have been thinking of beefing up my PC and have thought of buying the Nvidia 8800GTS by Pny. Is this a good card or should I go with a newer card like the 96 or 9800? Now I see here the GTX 260. Is this a better card than the 8800 GTS? Any help will be greatly appreciated. Of course I am getting 2 gig stick of ram amongst other things. I am just unsure about which graphics card to get.

  • KingOfTheNubeis

    Posted Jan 4, 2009 6:12 am PT

    8800gt in my old athlon64x2 works with most games at 1200x960 U can get these nice and cheap now.

    Processer is a big factor.
    I needed 2 machines & build a quad core 3ghz with a 4870x2,put the 4870x2 in my old macine went faster,
    not that faster.the 4870x2 scaled nice on the 64x2 4200.Hook it up to a quad and it shreads everything in front
    of it AA at 16x at 1680x1050.In short its a BEAST that needs to be FED!
    To a lesser extent the same will apply to these new cards,have u the horse power 1st?

  • CDudu

    Posted Jan 4, 2009 3:56 am PT

    GTX 260 and 4870 are pretty much the same right now.Maybe later i heard that CUDA and that physX system the NVidia cards have, will be used by some games.I think Empire:Total War is one of them.

  • dannyatkinson

    Posted Jan 4, 2009 2:48 am PT

    killik_123 try the Geforce 8600GT. It is a nice card and should be under 100 bucks.
    It isn't king of the hill but I gotta say that for a budget card it is pretty powerful.
    I cannot max out the settings but this thing plays crysis on my 2nd rig no problems.
    I got the Zotac version. It is a very nice card for the price. I still use it.

  • AMDAtiFanboy

    Posted Jan 3, 2009 10:33 pm PT

    well for under \$200 i'd go for Ati HD4850

advertisement