AMD announced and started shipping its ATI Radeon HD 4850 and 4870 cards in late June of this year, but the company wasn't shy about revealing its plans to ship a high-end dual-GPU Radeon HD 4870 card as early as August. The graphics companies--all companies, really--are usually pretty good about not announcing new products too early, particularly when those new products are anticipated to outperform the company's current product lineup. Upon learning about upcoming products, customers, being the smart cookies that they are, tend to hold off on purchases and wait for the new models to come out.

AMD wasn't worried about revealing the dual-GPU X2 card early because the single-GPU ATI Radeon HD 4870 offered more performance value than its previous-generation high-end card, the ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2. Nvidia, on the other hand, had just started shipping its high-end GeForce GTX 280, and AMD had no problem letting potential GTX 280 buyers know that the new X2 was on its way.

The ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2, like the ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2, features a single-board, dual-GPU design. The board has two ATI Radeon HD 4870 GPUs and 2GB of GDDR5 memory, or 1GB for each chip. The card has a new PCIe Gen 2 interconnect that offers increased GPU-to-GPU bandwidth and brings back PCI Express 2.0 support.

The X2 should perform about the same or slightly better than a two-card Radeon HD 4870 setup given that the X2 has the same GPUs on board. However, the X2 does have double the GDDR5 memory per chip compared to the single 4870, and you don't have to deal with getting a CrossFire motherboard and a power supply with enough power connectors. The X2 also retails for $549, a little less than what two $299 Radeon HD 4870 cards will cost you.

The X2 card only requires a single x16 PCI Express slot, so you won't need a CrossFire-enabled motherboard unless you want to run two X2 cards together for quad-GPU fun. Each X2 card has an 8-pin (2x4-pin) and 6-pin (2x3-pin) power connector for external power. ATI recommends using a 650W power supply for a single card and 1000W for two cards.

The X2 offers the same Avivo HD video support and video output options as the single-GPU 4870, which includes ATI's hardware-accelerated UVD 2 unified video decoder for high-definition video, accelerated video transcoding, DVD upscaling, and full HDMI output with sound.

We put our Power Color Radeon HD 4780 X2 card up against its closest single-card competition, the GeForce GTX 280. However, we must mention that the X2 retails for $549, about $50 more than the GTX 280's $499 suggested retail price. Of course, we also have to mention that Nvidia originally launched the GeForce GTX 280 at $649 before dropping the price in advance of the X2's launch. In addition to single-card comparison testing, we were also able to test a dual-card Radeon HD 4870 X2 CrossFire setup against a dual-card GeForce GTX 280 SLI system. We filled out the rest of the field with single- and dual-card Radeon HD 4870 setups to show how the X2 compares to its smaller sibling.

Radeon HD 4870 X2 Performance

(Longer bars indicate better performance)

3DMark Vantage, Extreme Test

Radeon HD 4870 X2 CrossFire
11214
GeForce GTX 280 SLI
8465
Radeon HD 4870 X2
6902
Radeon HD 4870 CrossFire
4848
GeForce GTX 280
4963
Radeon HD 4870
2719

Call of Duty 4, 1920x1200, 4xAA, High Quality, Low Quality Water

Radeon HD 4870 X2 CrossFire
92
GeForce GTX 280 SLI
110
Radeon HD 4870 X2
63
Radeon HD 4870 CrossFire
70
GeForce GTX 280
63
Radeon HD 4870
40

Crysis, 1920x1080, High Quality

Radeon HD 4870 X2 CrossFire
30
GeForce GTX 280 SLI
42
Radeon HD 4870 X2
30
Radeon HD 4870 CrossFire
30
GeForce GTX 280
38
Radeon HD 4870
31

Team Fortress 2, 1920x1200, High Quality

Radeon HD 4870 X2 CrossFire
86
GeForce GTX 280 SLI
73
Radeon HD 4870 X2
88
Radeon HD 4870 CrossFire
88
GeForce GTX 280
74
Radeon HD 4870
91

System Setup: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775, Intel D5400XS, 4GB FB-DIMM (2x2GB), Windows Vista SP1, Windows XP SP3, 750GB Seagate 7200.10 SATA Hard Disk Drive. Graphics Cards: PowerColor Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB (1GBx2), ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB (1GBx2), PNY GeForce GTX 280 1GB, Radeon HD 4870 512MB. Graphics Drivers: ATI Catalyst 8.552, Nvidia ForceWare beta 177.79.

The 3DMark Vantage tests confirm that four Radeon HD 4780 GPUs can work together in a Radeon HD 4870 X2 CrossFire configuration. It's shocking to see a five-digit score so soon, when scoring half as much in the Extreme test was considered excellent just a few months ago. Call of Duty 4 scales well when you throw additional 4870 GPUs at it, but the results indicate that the GeForce GTX 280 offers a better cost per frame value. Crysis also remains an Nvidia stronghold. Frame rates didn't budge when we tried adding more Radeon HD 4870 GPUs in our Harbor Assault benchmarking, while doubling up on GTX 280 cards yielded immediate frame rate increases. The Radeon HD 4870 cards beat the GeForce GTX 280 in Team Fortress 2, but frame rates in the CPU-limited game didn't increase as we added more GPUs. A single Radeon HD 4870 card will be enough to give you the GDDR5 benefits in TF2.

The ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 performs just like a dual-card ATI Radeon HD 4870 CrossFire setup without any of the multicard hassle. Increasing the on-board memory to 1GB per GPU didn't produce frame rate increases in our game tests, but it did help the X2 pull away from the Radeon HD 4870 CrossFire in the forward-looking 3DMark Vantage benchmark. The $549 ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 put up the best performance numbers we've ever seen in 3DMark Vantage, and it scaled well in Call of Duty 4, but the Radeon's nonexistent dual- and quad-GPU performance gains in Crysis remind us that multi-GPU configurations rely too much on graphics driver updates and game patches to unlock the full potential of the hardware.

295 Comments

  • pcgamer06

    Posted Sep 24, 2009 12:19 pm PT

    I'm confused on the Team Fortress test how did the Radeon HD 4870 get a higher frame rate (91fps) then the Radeon HD 4870 X2 CrossFire (86fps)??

  • knightboy1012

    Posted Sep 8, 2009 5:57 pm PT

    Man, i need to update everything on my PC or buy a new one lol..... I still have crappy Intel 2 Duo Dual-Core 2.00 Ghz, 3GB DDR3 Ram, 485 GB Main Harddrive, 90 GB Seconday Harddrive, And finally the most important thing, a FREAKING ATI RADEON HD 2400!!!!!!!! GD!!!!!! anyone know where i can get a cheap better procesorrs, and a graphics card lol???? GREATLY APPRECIATED, Gamer ID: Knightboy1012

  • bangurdead1101

    Posted Sep 3, 2009 6:15 pm PT

    crossfire/SLI are the biggest scam on earth unfortunately...
    the concept is taking the best video card now which can play almost any game at acceptable frame rates (except crysis cuz they suck at optimization) and buy two of it....

    if you're not seeing the retarded part its paying twice for the newest card on the block that doesn't struggle with games to achieve maybe if you're lucky 15% increase in preformance...

    but you have to spend more on a more powerful power supply to support the cards if you do go that route...

    on the other hand ATI & AMD rock when it comes to providing Cheap and Powerful cards and Processors with Quad cores under 200.00 while the i7 fanbase are blowing 4-5 hundred dollars...

  • lowkey999

    Posted Aug 14, 2009 7:58 am PT

    i prefer the GeForce GTX 280 SLI cause i'm using it and this graphic card really are the speed demon

  • Cenue

    Posted Jun 3, 2009 11:53 am PT

    Dominator_Lynk, the reason for the poor frame rate in Crysis is that the game can only take advantage of three GPU cores. Running two GTX 295s or two Radeon 4870 X2s will not increase performance. Currently, the ultimate setup for Crysis would be three GTX 285s running in SLI from EVGA, the FTW edition. We'll have to see what the Radeon HD 5000 and GTX 300 series bring in terms of single GPU performance come later this year.

  • alenko

    Posted May 19, 2009 4:32 am PT

    i have this

  • nashman2000

    Posted May 14, 2009 7:22 pm PT

    I have the Diamond 4870 X2 and i have to admit this card is beast and I am realy happy with it. Im running it on a custom rig with the i7 920, 6gb patriot DDR3 tri channel ram, with Windows Vista Ultimate 64 bit. My windows rating comes up as 5.9 out of 6 and the graphics card rating is 5.9. I've always bought ATI cards and this card is byfar the best, and its never failed me. I can run any game on the highest graphics settings so if your considering a new card grab the Radeon 4870 X2.

  • thinksilly

    Posted Apr 30, 2009 4:40 am PT

    Well i already got it

  • Dominator_Lynk

    Posted Apr 13, 2009 2:28 pm PT

    yeah, i have to agree with some of you, the crysis test smells fishy

    2 massive, nuke-powered ati cards, and all you can dish out is 30 fps?? and oh, whats this, there is no difference between a 1 card setup and crossfire? all I'm saying is MAYBE somebody got payed to limit ati cards.

  • kartik24

    Posted Apr 13, 2009 7:51 am PT

    im praying for the day when pc hunting is not so heavy on our wallets

  • AirForceGamer

    Posted Mar 29, 2009 10:50 pm PT

    TWO years later and Crysis is still punishing the latest graphics cards. What a feat.

  • svaargod

    Posted Mar 4, 2009 6:38 am PT

    wow people it looks like we are going to witness some big changes in next 6 months...I bet you all know exactly what I mean i7 is out for some time ...graphic cards are now taking theyre turn again...by the end of this year I hope to see a revolution in graphic field !

  • kosborne

    Posted Mar 3, 2009 1:48 pm PT

    ATI ROX! Once they get the games to support multiple graphics cards at least...

  • xdeiri

    Posted Jan 28, 2009 12:48 am PT

    ati ftw

  • Wings_008

    Posted Jan 26, 2009 6:08 am PT

    am just gonna get a 9800gx2 XXX edition and get done with my crappy ati 2800

  • killik_123

    Posted Jan 20, 2009 10:16 am PT

    might as well just buy the 4870 normal version

  • rabidmonkey92

    Posted Dec 21, 2008 9:06 pm PT

    phail

  • issizots

    Posted Dec 12, 2008 11:24 pm PT

    um excuse me but ever since 3dfx went out and nvidia took over they have REPEADLY took and/OR stolen ATI's ideas, they took anti aliasing and even tried to make their own anostrophic filtering which sucked and im sorry to say look @ console gaming aswell two of the top 3 consoles are ATI chipet bound. im TIRED of knowledgeless clowns think nvidia is this and that superior to ATI, they BOTH have their UPS AND DOWNS and right now ATI is having a field day with their HD 4870 x2 against anything nvidia throws at it, i feel sorry for nvidia because soon they're going under without a doubt andthat's one reason; MONEY, compare the cost right now compared to ATI's priceline on value based and performance based products and DO THE MATH

  • jetbruceli

    Posted Dec 8, 2008 12:19 am PT

    Here is my take, ATI had to come up with something cuz everytime it brought something out it would be dismantled by Nvidia. X2000 and X3000 didnt change anything so of course X4000 would. Even then, it still hasnt proved to be an overwhelming advantage to take the lead. Nvidia's GTX 280 is still the King of Single Cards. I hope they continue to fight though, my new pc is due in Aug 09 and I would love to finally play Crysis in Ultra High in 1080p with over 60 fps.

  • halo1579

    Posted Dec 7, 2008 6:25 am PT

    init

  • nosex

    Posted Dec 3, 2008 5:21 am PT

    I wonder what which os they used for the better performance..????

  • bobbyb2003

    Posted Nov 30, 2008 1:35 pm PT

    @vishawn
    Awesome point! If you're a person who knows what upgrades are completely necessary, how often to upgrade, and where to get cheap parts, then PC is the best. Though if you have no idea what you're doing and upgrade with each new graphics card series, PC gaming will get really expensive really quickly.

  • sbose22

    Posted Nov 30, 2008 5:35 am PT

    The thing is, ATI's cards in general benchmark really well because of the way they're designed, but in the long run Nvidia provides better drivers and hardware for gaming... and in the end that's what matters

  • chigga102

    Posted Nov 22, 2008 6:19 pm PT

    best is still 8800gs... best bang for buck. its the new 7600gt

  • naysayers

    Posted Nov 19, 2008 3:18 am PT

    hmm..nvidia rules but i have ati....hehehe

  • Aksarafrezz

    Posted Nov 17, 2008 8:11 pm PT

    NVIDIA FTW!!!!! hehehe peace y'all

  • william623 posted Nov 10, 2008 6:23 am PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    william623

    Posted Nov 10, 2008 6:23 am PT (hide)

    I already have dual SLI 9800GX2 in my computer gaming system, no worthy to change to ATI GPU system, i think nVidia is the best for gaming PC, rite? I got before my previous AGP computer system, that time i use X1950Pro, feel like have performance cheating, ATI? i din quite like it, i love nVidia when GeForce 4 (MX 440)... nVidia is the good choice for gaming...

  • mohps3 posted Nov 9, 2008 4:42 am PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    mohps3

    Posted Nov 9, 2008 4:42 am PT (hide)

    nvidia best than ati cause most of nex gen games made for nvidia card,that is truth any one have oponion at last but this the truth

  • vishawn posted Nov 8, 2008 4:14 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    vishawn

    Posted Nov 8, 2008 4:14 pm PT (hide)

    I'm done with PC gaming. Too many decisions, too expensive, and the second you upgrade your PC, you have to turn around and do it again. Console gaming is the way to go. Unless you REALLY know what you are doing in the PC world, then PC gaming is not a good choice. If you know what you are doing, PC is the best. The ATI card sounds not as good as NvIDIA's.

  • DarkNeoBahamut

    Posted Nov 7, 2008 7:18 pm PT

    impressive, now this is better for ATI, I may consider on buying it (in the future :p )

  • Skindofthedred

    Posted Nov 6, 2008 4:52 pm PT

    Yes, you can put 2 or 3 graphics cards of equal potential in your computer or one that is one step up or one step down.

  • soysauceman2

    Posted Nov 2, 2008 8:40 pm PT

    What's up with the CoD4 low quality water?......... *scratches head

  • Xomonuchi

    Posted Nov 2, 2008 2:25 pm PT

    can u put 2 or 3 of the same graphic card into your pc ? message me the answer thanks

  • patsy-cline

    Posted Nov 2, 2008 10:01 am PT

    ye i know what ya terabyt, it doesn't matter if you got a currency converter, in the U.K or Ireland in my case, its a load of bollox for the prices of these cards. In July of last year I paid 200 euro for a 8600gts......... 200 euro!!!! only to find out 3 months later its half the price in America! oh and CY4N1D3_625, do not get quad SLI yet, its really bad especially in terms of 9800GX2, I read a review on it, and a lot of the time its slower when quad SLI is enabled.

  • terabyt

    Posted Oct 29, 2008 12:33 pm PT

    I've been waiting for a review of this card. It's a shame the pricing is in $$$

  • Alizerothree posted Oct 21, 2008 2:59 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    Alizerothree

    Posted Oct 21, 2008 2:59 pm PT (hide)

    I could not be a happier gamer knowing that I don't have to deal with shelling out 500 bucks for a video card every year, installing and uninstalling games, drivers, crash to desktops, upgrades etc etc. Just turn on a PS3 or XBOX360 and game on!!

  • huscosft

    Posted Oct 20, 2008 4:26 pm PT

    I got XFX_8600GT_Fatal1ty and it sucks . I'll get 4870X2 ASAP

  • CY4N1D3_625

    Posted Oct 17, 2008 11:05 am PT

    I got a 9800 GX2 as well. It performs pretty well, and it should last for a while before I go to Quad-SLI.

  • sabitrulz

    Posted Oct 14, 2008 2:15 am PT

    Got the 9800gx2,so need to upgrade atleast for 1 year I think.

  • SuperGamer911

    Posted Oct 12, 2008 6:08 pm PT

    So many awesome video cards. Guess what? My motherboard has a PCI whatever not a PCI Express. This means that my computer isn't compatible with the graphics card I've wanted for so long; The NVIDIA GeForce 9600. I have to get the lame GeForce 8400 (or was it 8300?) Hm.. what this this have to do with the new graphic cards?.....

  • mailbox2112

    Posted Oct 12, 2008 10:21 am PT

    I love how they benchmark on games optimized for Nvidia and not ATI and vice versa, instead of games that arent optimized for a particular video card.

  • Box_of_Sunshine

    Posted Oct 10, 2008 10:19 am PT

    Sadly, because ATI's drivers are written to work better in benchmarks over games, while it's the other way around for nVidia.

  • falconian_uk

    Posted Oct 7, 2008 8:32 am PT

    why do ATI cards seem to do so well in 3DMark, then when it comes to games they seem to fall flat on thier arse! ever since I purchased my ATI HD 3870, I have fallen for ATI cards, I used to own Nvidia cards for years, and I mean years, I'm 49 and still play games nearly every day, I come from the old school, played on my Commodore Amiga Vic20 for hours and hours, games have come along way since then, and its all thanks to ATI and Nvidia, both companies produce great cards, I remember when Matrox used to be one of the big names, and 3DFX has been taken over by one of the big guns these days.

    Anyway.....why do ATI do well in 3Dmark, they seem to fall back in Games?

  • mido321 posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    mido321

    Posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (hide)

    pc games are expansive

  • mido321 posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    mido321

    Posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (hide)

    pc games are expansive

  • mido321 posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    mido321

    Posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (hide)

    pc games are expansive

  • mido321 posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    mido321

    Posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (hide)

    pc games are expansive

  • zako94 posted Oct 3, 2008 4:11 am PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    zako94

    Posted Oct 3, 2008 4:11 am PT (hide)

    somestupidloser
    i stop buying this things from year ago i am gonna buy PS3 and stop that stuped tragedy of buying a video card every 7 or 8 months i no more play PC video games

  • somestupidloser

    Posted Oct 2, 2008 8:18 pm PT

    Crysis is one of the biggest failures in optimization in the history of video games. You could get a better looking game for about half the hardware requirements on a different engine. Not to say that Crysis isn't bad looking, it's just that it's whole presentation is just ugly.

  • TheHunt3D

    Posted Sep 29, 2008 5:21 am PT

    This is where my dedication to NVIDIA will probably be my downfall. I REFUSE to buy an ATI graphics card despite the fact that the HD 4870 X2 is R1000 cheaper that the GTX 280 and in most cases faster. Lets hope that NVIDIA's next graphics card will be better and use a smaller manufacturing process.

advertisement

ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 Hands-On

Find out how the ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 compares to the GeForce GTX 280 in a battle between the two flagship video cards.

Tags