Laptop hard drives, like the one found in the PlayStation 3, take up little physical space. However, going smaller generally requires compromises. Performance takes a backseat, because manufacturers design the drives primarily for lower power consumption and heat emission. Sony likely wanted to make a smaller console and had to settle for using a space-saving laptop drive. That means we're stuck with a slow drive, and the console reminds us of it every time we install or load up and play a game. To speed things up a bit we could replace the 5,400rpm stock hard drive with an incrementally faster 7,200rpm drive. But that's the easy way out. We'd rather go the Tool Time way and slap in a next-generation solid state drive (SSD). Traditional hard drives have motors and platters that spin and move, and both of those devices take up power and generate heat. SSDs have no moving parts whatsoever--they're based entirely on NAND flash memory like the kind used in memory cards and USB storage devices. SSDs use very little power, emit far less heat, are completely silent, and provide excellent performance--if you can afford them.

Solid state drives aren't anything new; they've just been very expensive for much of their existence. Late last year 60GB SSDs sold for around $1,000. That number is far from affordable, but it was still half as expensive as it was more than a year ago. SSDs will continue to drop tremendously in price, grow in capacity, and increase in performance as the technology makes it way into more mainstream electronics. Apple, for example, offers an SSD as an option for its lightweight MacBook Air notebook. Prices for 60GB SSDs already hover in the $400 territory--not cheap, but getting closer to traditional platter-based hard drives.

Top       Bottom       Stacked      

SSDs are perfect for notebooks because they're light, they don't consume a lot of power, and they give off very little heat. The good news is that you can slide those same 2.5-inch solid state notebook drives right into a PlayStation 3. We got our hands on a 60GB SuperTalent Master Drive MX SSD to see how it performs in a PlayStation 3. The $400 60GB Master Drive MX specifications state that it has 120MB/s read speeds, but its write speeds cap off at 40MB/s. By comparison, we tested the stock PlayStation 3 hard drive and observed 32MB/s read and write speeds. The MX drive doesn't match up to the 120MB/s reads and the blistering 70MB/s writes of the more expensive $1,300 Super Talent 60GB Master Drive DX, but some upgrades get more difficult to justify when the PlayStation 3 itself costs only about $400.

Installing a solid state drive into the PlayStation 3 doesn't take long; we detailed the process in our How to Upgrade Your PlayStation 3 Hard Drive feature. Aside from screws that are incredibly tight and easy to strip, the process is simple and relatively painless. The SSD has normal SATA hard drive connections and is sized perfectly to fit into the PlayStation 3's hard drive tray.

PlayStation 3 SSD Performance

(Shorter bars indicate better performance)

Game Installation Time - Minutes

Devil May Cry 4 - Stock Drive
21.2
Devil May Cry 4 - SSD
32.5
Grand Theft Auto 4 - Stock Drive
8.1
Grand Theft Auto 4 - SSD
9.83
Assassin's Creed - Stock Drive
3
Assassin's Creed - SSD
4.5

XMB to Game Menu Load Time - Seconds

Devil May Cry 4 - Stock Drive
40
Devil May Cry 4 - SSD
36
Grand Theft Auto 4 - Stock Drive
97
Grand Theft Auto 4 - SSD
93
Assassin's Creed - Stock Drive
58
Assassin's Creed - SSD
47

Save Game Load Time - Seconds

Devil May Cry 4 - Stock Drive
6
Devil May Cry 4 - SSD
6
Grand Theft Auto 4 - Stock Drive
15
Grand Theft Auto 4 - SSD
12
Assassin's Creed - Stock Drive
22
Assassin's Creed - SSD
16

Test System Setup: PlayStation 3 Stock Hard Drive - Seagate Momentus 5400.2 60GB, SuperTalent 60GB Master Drive MX SSD.

Performance

Solid state drives have advantages and disadvantages, which the results pretty much illustrate. The game installation test results show that writes on our 60GB SSD were substantially slower than writes on the stock PS3 hard drive by around 20-30 percent. More expensive SSDs have substantially faster write speeds and compete easily with the fastest desktop drives on the market.

The Devil May Cry 4 installation time in particular looks odd. The length of time the game takes to install comes as no surprise, but its performance compared to other games is undeniably subpar. Both Assassin's Creed and Grand Theft Auto IV stay relatively close to each other in terms of transfer rates, while Devil May Cry 4 runs almost half as fast.

Write speeds are only one part of the story because you generally install a game only once. The rest of the time, you'll likely be loading up saved games, waiting for levels to load, or launching games from the XMB. The SSD excels in those instances. Assassin's Creed showed tremendous speed increases both when starting the game and when loading a saved game. Grand Theft Auto IV also had gains, but Devil May Cry 4 hardly budged in favor of the SSD when it came to saved game loads. The SSD's superior read performance doesn't nullify load times entirely, but it does help to reduce them.

Conclusion

At a cost of $400, it's hard to justify purchasing a solid state drive, especially when you consider that the money could buy you a whole new console. The argument becomes even more difficult to push when the benefits of said drive aren't universal. Load times improved, but installation times increased tremendously. More expensive SSDs have faster write speeds, but at almost four times the cost. There certainly are benefits to upgrading to a solid state drive, but we wouldn't recommend doing so until the prices and speed are more in line with performance expectations. Fortunately, solid state drive prices seem to halve every year, and performance is improving. We shouldn't have to wait much longer for SSDs with larger capacities, better performance, and lower prices.

629 Comments

  • ryan_5000

    Posted Jun 15, 2009 7:33 pm PT

    it rli dsnt take long to load stuff anyway, so spend more money for the greedy companies and get 5 seconds of extra gameplay YAY!...... not.

  • shani_boy101

    Posted May 11, 2009 11:54 pm PT

    @COLi-COLi
    like in Killzone 2 on the load screens you can tilt the screen at any angle with the controller.

    i'd get an SSD if they improved on the load times. It writes fast but its slow on reading what its got.

  • COLi-COLi

    Posted May 9, 2009 3:37 pm PT

    The loading times aren't that bad. Most games seem to let you do something on the screen while the game is loading.

  • brendanhunt1

    Posted Jan 2, 2009 4:20 pm PT

    Not worth it at the moment

  • leandrovidotti

    Posted Dec 31, 2008 5:32 am PT

    Is there nothing else to write about?

  • ImYourStalker

    Posted Dec 26, 2008 2:08 pm PT

    sure they do you just got to carry a giant box around along with your laptop lol

  • Geetarman42

    Posted Dec 18, 2008 2:45 pm PT

    LightKeria: You can get a 1tb, 7,200rpm laptop HDD, they don't make em.

  • LightKeria

    Posted Nov 25, 2008 4:45 am PT

    $400 for a smaller drive with longer install times for a few seconds off? no chance. if you upgrade your drive get a 1tb, 7,200rpm for £100. but why bother unless you run out of HDD space then the Stock drive is fine.

  • division_9

    Posted Nov 14, 2008 7:43 am PT

    Test it with a good SSD

  • jiggerkiller

    Posted Oct 21, 2008 6:42 am PT

    how about testing it with a good ssd?

    Intel x25
    Mtron pro

  • Gladiator-Redo

    Posted Aug 5, 2008 4:38 am PT

    jeez I didn't know all these "extra costs" of the 360 - thnx god i decided to wait a few months and take the ps3 rather than the 360
    anyway, an is not necessary or even accesible for us. i would never take a 60GB SSD drive for around 500euros ( i'm even talking about 1.000 ) since it takes more time to install my games and only saves a few secs. i would rather take one of the new Western Digital "Velociraptors" - faster in every section, loads biger, and it costs much less
    when SSD prices go down (under 150) and Speed - GB go up( 200GB let's say ) i might consider buying one - till then i prefer the "old fashioned" HDDs

  • Gladiator-Redo

    Posted Aug 5, 2008 4:38 am PT

    jeez I didn't know all these "extra costs" of the 360 - thnx god i decided to wait a few months and take the ps3 rather than the 360
    anyway, an is not necessary or even accesible for us. i would never take a 60GB SSD drive for around 500euros ( i'm even talking about 1.000 ) since it takes more time to install my games and only saves a few secs. i would rather take one of the new Western Digital "Velociraptors" - faster in every section, loads biger, and it costs much less
    when SSD prices go down (under 150) and Speed - GB go up( 200GB let's say ) i might consider buying one - till then i prefer the "old fashioned" HDDs

  • theWanderer80

    Posted Jul 11, 2008 11:08 pm PT

    @csliney: This generation the PS3 is the most complete package out of the box. And what hidden costs are you referring to? The hdd upgrade/downgrade mentioned in this article is totally optional. The 360, although I love mine, has the MOST hidden costs. You gotta pay for wi-fi, Live, replacement batteries or play and charge for controllers, M$ points etc etc, you even hafto pay to change your gamertag... should I go on?

    Plus, the PS3 games catalog will eventually catch up. The 360 had over a year's head start on Sony's machine. People seem to forget that.

  • JACKAL1883

    Posted Jun 20, 2008 9:18 am PT

    it may not increase performance on a ps3 but you will see a major increase with a PC

  • Llama_Girl

    Posted Jun 16, 2008 1:26 am PT

    Marginal Difference that doesn't warrant puling your PS3 apart.
    all for the sake of having a little patience.
    "The meatloaf will be done in 40 seconds." -Marge.
    "40 seconds? but i want it now."- Homer.

  • DeltaCobra

    Posted Jun 16, 2008 12:27 am PT

    Well after reading this, there is no way I would part with even $300 dollars upwards for an even better drive.. what a load of crap honestly who needs this ****
    Spend the money on some audio or speakers or something USEFUL...

    I cant beleive the reviewer trying to pass off the DMC4 install as the only neg... hahaha idiota.

  • Amir_Rasyidi

    Posted Jun 14, 2008 8:09 am PT

    fail!

  • Gothann

    Posted Jun 13, 2008 8:54 pm PT

    @coopersaeli: Looks like you don't know much about the PS3, then. They let you switch out the Hard Drive at any time with no penalty. What I don't get is who would want to buy a same-sized SSD when for the same price they could get half a terabyte of data at 7200RPM, with money left to buy another game or two.

  • rafferty_1875

    Posted Jun 13, 2008 4:53 am PT

    The installation times arent good.

  • THE_BRUTALIZER

    Posted Jun 12, 2008 4:33 pm PT

    this is a good idea......
    BUT THE PS3 DOESNT NEED IT

    that could be a small problem......its like putting sugar on ice cream..... it doesnt need it

  • CaNiBuSKiD69

    Posted Jun 12, 2008 3:19 pm PT

    It's difficult to comprehend why anyone would spend the money on a SSD. I wouldn't mind purchasing a 7,200 RPM SATA drive that would definitely improve performance. I wish GS would do another article comparing the stock PS3 drive and a 7,200 RPM drive. A 160GB SATA 7200 RPM drive can be found for $130, which would offer a great performance increase than SSD would do for now.

  • alberto2045

    Posted Jun 12, 2008 1:30 pm PT

    amazing man thats crazy, but its not worth it just yet, maybe someday ill buy one only if I have tohe money for it

  • shadowking34

    Posted Jun 12, 2008 10:01 am PT

    i hope they put this in ever ps3

  • kb8618

    Posted Jun 12, 2008 9:07 am PT

    i wish they also added a 7200rpm hdd because i'm trying to decide what one i should get, but the cheap SSD at the moment aren't worth it

  • MottoK

    Posted Jun 12, 2008 7:22 am PT

    I agree with you drxym - but one thing I think is terrible at the moment is the lack of games (decent or otherwise) at the moment for the PS3 - it's the same handful of games every time I go to the shop or look at the gamespot chart, it sucks. Xbox 360 at least is getting a decent amount of games, every time I see a game I like it always seems to be on Xbox 360, rarely PS3.

    I hope this situation changes, the reaons I bought the PS3 was for the reasons you mentioned plus the fact that it doesn't sound like a 747 taking off every time you start it, it's completely silent which is great (and keeps the wife happy!).

    Just lucky I do most of my gaming on the PC I suppose!

  • drxym

    Posted Jun 12, 2008 5:49 am PT

    csliney, actually the PS3 does not have "so many hidden costs". What are you even prattling about? Wifi, HDD, controller, charge cable for controller are all included in the price. And online network play is free too. And since the PS3 uses standards like USB, Bluetooth, SATA, you can easily add 3rd party peripherals like headsets, keyboards, mice, storage devices etc.

    It's especially stupid to hear you claim hidden costs when you go on to proclaim you own a 360 and Wii. The 360 has plenty of hidden costs, from the exhorbitant price of its proprietary HDD through to XBL subscription. Even the Wii does not escape when you need a "Classic Controller" to play those virtual games.

  • SapSacPrime posted Jun 12, 2008 5:09 am PT (does not meet display criteria. login to show)

    SapSacPrime

    Posted Jun 12, 2008 5:09 am PT (hide)

    Wow the PS3 has so many hidden costs and is so expensive anyway I wont be buying one for years from now . It is expensive enough as it is, but with forced installation I am going to need more HDD space (I like a lot of games) and I may aswell make it a big one and the best available, so expense . I think my Wii 360 will do for the next few years, by that time PS3 will be cheaper and have games .
    *and brian911689 was that a joke because if so 'tis a good one .

  • dmiisha_796

    Posted Jun 12, 2008 5:02 am PT

    PS3 totally unbenefitial. With half-an hours worth of load times, i'm thankfull i bought an xbox 360. No long load times.

  • shappy1010

    Posted Jun 12, 2008 4:22 am PT

    Why the negative posts? I thought this article was pretty useful, it´s nice to see things finally developing at this front. I can´t wait for my first HDD-free PC, HDDs are the last of the spinning storage formats, they´re noisy, energy inefficient and unreliable.I hope to see the end of them soon.

  • brian911689

    Posted Jun 12, 2008 4:10 am PT

    I like load times, it gives me time to remember the good things in life like how awesome MGS4 (PS3 exclusive) is gonna be.

  • Commander-Chaos

    Posted Jun 12, 2008 3:34 am PT

    this article seems pretty pointless...

  • sykalob

    Posted Jun 12, 2008 2:17 am PT

    wondering how much money that gamespot bribed for showing this stupid advertisement for almost a week

  • greengir

    Posted Jun 12, 2008 12:36 am PT

    useless!

  • Faustus01

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 11:58 pm PT

    Good point Uncle Lev, but you were off by a few million erase cycles as well as the newer hardware actually having safes for data arrangement so it won't wear out the drives as fast.

    To note as well, the actual durability and longevity of the drives is increasing as development continues, so while you may worry about the drive eventually crapping out, when it's finally a viable cost product that may likely not be the case.

  • lozvil

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 10:11 pm PT

    useless nonsense!!!!

  • BIFFAR

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 6:23 pm PT

    Dead on coopersaeli. Rediculous. I havent researched anything though.

  • king_pro_aza

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 6:19 pm PT

    the best idea for faster performance out of the ps3 would be to get one of the new Western Digital Velociraptors. it's large enough for your music, photos, games etc (300GB worth) and doens't compromise write speeds for read speeds. the velociraptors are also 2.5" hdd. so it's perfect!
    you get the best of both worlds. and they're not as expensive as SSD. these drives don't spin at 5400rpm, not at 7200rpm, but at 10000rpm!!
    how about it =p

  • coopersaeli

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 4:17 pm PT

    so... for $400 i can upgrade my ps3's capacity to load 3 seconds faster and cut down the heat emitted by my system? Does this also void my warranty? lol.

  • nvfigueiredo

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 2:22 pm PT

    Slimezzz, at least make an effort to read the article before commenting.

  • Miniman1030

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 1:51 pm PT

    Well, The Gamers have decided: Everyone says no but the rich people and the people that think it is "nice" but are still not going to buy it.

  • ShadowOfKratos

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 1:49 pm PT

    Developer excuses...

    Can someone tell me why Uncharted never needed an installation...?
    Or even Oblivion, which was a technical benchmark when it came out for the PS3...?

    Developers really need to start making some serious homework on the PS3...

  • ultima_weapon21

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 10:51 am PT

    i just got a westgate 320gb drive for $120.00 u think just cause thhis ssd is silent and gives less heat thats gonna make me buy it HELL NO!im happy with mine thnx s*** $400 gets you ONLY 60gb NOT WORTH IT even for some 1 whos wiping their *** with $100 bills.

  • ekee

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 10:08 am PT

    well i m not pretty impress with ps3 having SSD Drive as the same price of the console ............. But it is a first step towards a Good idea of having NAND Flash Hard Drives ........................

  • edwardorito

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 8:23 am PT

    lol if sony would add that it would be a better deal if they're gunna make a ps3 slim

  • Hotnutz007

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 8:17 am PT

    This is something I'm definately interested in, but not at $400. I bought my PS3 within the first 2 months of launch.......a 60 gb model, so that was a rather pricy INVESTMENT. I think I'm gonna have to wait for the price of SSD's to come down.......a LOT.....like come down $250!!!!! and thats still pricy....considering I just bought a new HDD for my laptop...a Seagate 80gb, 5400rpm......for $32.00. I think I'd rather wait the few seconds of load time!!!!!!!

  • slimezzz posted Jun 11, 2008 7:44 am PT (does not meet display criteria. login to show)

    slimezzz

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 7:44 am PT (hide)

    What are sony playing at....i have 360, ps3 and wii, and i have not turned on my ps3 for 4 months. The games for it are poor (except for a couple, and MGS comin soon) no way near as good quality as 360 or wii. Now instead of attempting to make things better, games wise they want to take more of our monies by introducing this good for nothin (except reduces heat ........ :s) piece of **** SSD thingy. So much bull!!

  • gamegoliath

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 7:25 am PT

    Everyone here seems to be saying it is not worth it to buy an SSD because it really isn't much faster, and is so expensive, but the really good thing about them is no heat!! That is a great thing, seeing how if my apartment gets above 78 degrees, my PS3 gets really loud, and is quite obnoxious, especially when I play mostly at night when the rest of the family is sleeping, and I have to turn my volume up too loud to hear past the PS3's noise. I had to buy an air conditioner just to feel safe playing my PS3 for more than 5 minutes at a time, and that thing is loud too, louder even!! So I for one will be saving my money for a SSD, since I am no millionaire either, and hopefully they will have larger capacities, and be a lot cheaper by the time I have a good chunk saved.

advertisement

PlayStation 3 Solid State Drive Report

Load times getting you down? Why not slap a Solid State drive into your PlayStation 3?

Tags