GeForce 9800 GX2
GeForce 9800 GX2 interview with Nvidia's Ujesh Desai

[UPDATE 03/25/08: We have updated the story with Quad SLI performance results in Windows Vista SP1.]

We knew that Nvidia's flagship GeForce 8800 Ultra's days were numbered after the graphics manufacturer released the GeForce 8800 GT late last year. A single GeForce 8800 GT can't outperform an Ultra, but two GTs will, and the two cards can be had for less than the price of a single Ultra. AMD also added pressure on the Ultra with the release of its dual-GPU ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2. Nvidia has today responded with a new flagship card, the GeForce 9800 GX2.

The GeForce 9800 GX2 promises top performance thanks to its two onboard GeForce 9800 GPUs, featuring a combined total of 256 processing cores clocked at 1.5GHz. In comparison, the GeForce 8800 Ultra has only 128 processing cores at the same clock speed. The GX2 also comes with an equally large price tag, with an estimated retail price ranging from $599 to $649. Our XFX GeForce 9800 GX2 came with Company of Heroes and an "I'm gaming, Do not disturb" doorknob hanger.

GeForce 9800 GX2       Outputs       Power       Audio input       Software and docs      

It's easiest to think of the GeForce 9800 GX2 as SLI on a single card. The card has two stacked printed circuit boards, one for each GPU, similar to the design of the GeForce 7950 GX2. However, unlike the 7950, the 9800 GX2 comes encased in a sleek plastic enclosure. The two GPUs won't double the frame rates over a single chip due to SLI overhead, but should show decent gains ranging between 1 and 2x depending on the application. The card has 1GB of memory with 512MB dedicated to each chip. The GX2 supports PCI Expresss 2.0 and DirectX 10. ATI's latest cards support DirectX 10.1, but we haven't seen any games that take advantage of it yet.

Nvidia has confirmed that you will be able to run two GeForce 9800 GX2 cards together for Quad SLI, but the company isn't letting any publications post quad-GPU numbers until next week, when its PC system partners make their Quad SLI announcements.

GPU GeForce 9800 GX2 GeForce 8800 Ultra GeForce 8800 GTX GeForce 8800 GT
Price $599-649 $649 $399 $189
Stream Processors 256 128 128 112
Shader Clock 1.5GHz 1.5GHz 1.35GHz 1.5GHz
Core Clock 600MHz 612MHz 575MHz 600MHz
Memory 512MBx2 768MB 768MB 512MB
Memory Clock 1GHz 1.08GHz 900MHz 900MHz
Memory Interface 256-bit 384-bit 384-bit 256-bit

Our XFX GeForce 9800 GX2 has HDMI and two dual-link DVI-I connectors. The dual-link DVI connectors can handle high-resolution monitors, and can also run VGA monitors using analog adaptors. HDMI output connectors have become more important now that video cards are capable of accelerating HD video playback. The GX2 has a SPDIF audio input connector on the top of the card to supply the audio feed from the motherboard or an external graphics card for HDMI output.

A performance monster like the GeForce 9800 GX2 also comes with hefty power requirements. Nvidia recommends using a 580W power supply with a single card and 850W for two GX2s running in SLI. XFX recommends 630W or more for a single GX2 and 680W or more for an SLI configuration. You also need to make sure that the power supply has the necessary six- and eight-pin power connectors for the card. The power input connectors can be a little snug--we had to snap off some of the plastic between the two connectors in order to get our Targas power supply plugs to fit into the card.

Power-conscious users might be interested in the GeForce 9800 GX2's new HybridPower feature that lets you switch between integrated graphics and the GX2 depending on the graphics workload. The switch allows users to save power while running normal desktop applications that don't need the video card's processing power. The feature currently only works with HybridPower-enabled motherboards with integrated GeForce graphics.

Judging by the specifications, we expected the XFX GeForce 9800 GX2 to perform similarly to a GeForce 8800 GTX or Ultra SLI system. We currently don't have any GeForce 8800 Ultra cards, but our dual GeForce 8800 GTX configuration, currently selling for close to $800, should be a formidable challenge. We also tossed in an ATI Radeon HD 3870 to see how another dual-GPU card compares, and a GeForce 8800 GT SLI setup to see how one of Nvidia's best SLI offerings stacks up to the newest 9800. We had to fall back to Windows XP SP2 in Crysis and Unreal Tournament 3 due to irregular driver performance in Vista.

XFX GeForce 9800 GX2 Performance

(Longer bars indicate better performance)

3DMark06, 1280x1024, Vista

GeForce 8800 GTX SLI
14728
GeForce 9800 GX2
14206
GeForce 8800 GT SLI
14506
Radeon HD 3870 X2
15970
GeForce 8800 GTX
12216

Call of Duty 4, 1600x1200, High Quality (Water Reflections Low), Vista

GeForce 8800 GTX SLI
93
GeForce 9800 GX2
81
GeForce 8800 GT SLI
90
Radeon HD 3870 X2
51
GeForce 8800 GTX
53

Crysis, 1600x1200, High Quality, XP

GeForce 8800 GTX SLI
48
GeForce 9800 GX2
47
GeForce 8800 GT SLI
43
Radeon HD 3870 X2
34
GeForce 8800 GTX
31

Unreal Tournament 3, 1600x1200 4xAA/8xAF, Maximum Quality, XP

GeForce 8800 GTX SLI
118
GeForce 9800 GX2
174
GeForce 8800 GT SLI
103
Radeon HD 3870 X2
137
GeForce 8800 GTX
66

Windows Vista System Setup: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775, Intel D5400XS, 4GB FB-DIMM (2x2GB), 750GB Seagate 7200.10 SATA Hard Disk Drive, Windows Vista 32-bit. Graphics Cards: GeForce 9800 GX2 1GB ,GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB, GeForce 8800 GT 512MB, Radeon HD 3870 X2 1GB. Graphics Drivers: ATI Catalyst 8.3, Nvidia ForceWare beta 169.44, Nvidia ForceWare beta 174.53.

Windows XP System Setup: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650, eVGA 780i SLI, 2GB Corsair (2x1GB), 750GB Seagate 7200.10 SATA Hard Disk Drive, Windows XP SP2. Graphics Cards: GeForce 9800 GX2 1GB ,GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB, GeForce 8800 GT 512MB, Radeon HD 3870 X2 1GB. Graphics Drivers: ATI Catalyst 8.3, Nvidia ForceWare beta 169.44, Nvidia ForceWare beta 174.53.

The GX2's performance level certainly justifies its place atop the GeForce 9 series product line. The GeForce 9800 GX2 more than doubled the performance of the GTX in Unreal Tournament 3 and offered a more than 50 percent improvement in Crysis and Call of Duty 4. The GX2 also beat out the $800 GTX SLI setup in Unreal Tournament 3, and matched the SLI system in Crysis before falling slightly behind in Call of Duty 4.

We ran a whole new set of benchmarks with two XFX GeForce 9800 GX2 cards running in Quad SLI on Windows Vista SP1. Some of the performance numbers are very different from the results of prior tests due to the Windows Vista SP1 update. We also had to switch from Windows XP to Windows Vista because Quad SLI currently works only in Windows Vista.

XFX GeForce 9800 GX2 Quad SLI Performance

(Longer bars indicate better performance)

3DMark06, 1280x1024, Vista SP1

GeForce 9800 GX2 Quad SLI
14702
GeForce 8800 GTX SLI
14797
GeForce 9800 GX2
13086
Radeon HD 3870 X2
16204
GeForce 8800 GTX
11408

Call of Duty 4, 1600x1200, High Quality (Water Reflections Low), Vista SP1

GeForce 9800 GX2 Quad SLI
125
GeForce 8800 GTX SLI
106
GeForce 9800 GX2
62
Radeon HD 3870 X2
58
GeForce 8800 GTX
66

Crysis, 1600x1200, High Quality, Vista SP1

GeForce 9800 GX2 Quad SLI
40
GeForce 8800 GTX SLI
30
GeForce 9800 GX2
28
Radeon HD 3870 X2
29
GeForce 8800 GTX
25

BioShock, 2048x1536, High Quality, Vista SP1

GeForce 9800 GX2 Quad SLI
118
GeForce 8800 GTX SLI
67
GeForce 9800 GX2
61
Radeon HD 3870 X2
62
GeForce 8800 GTX
47

Windows Vista System Setup: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775, Intel D5400XS, 4GB FB-DIMM (2x2GB), 750GB Seagate 7200.10 SATA Hard Disk Drive, Windows Vista 32-bit SP1. Graphics Cards: GeForce 9800 GX2 1GB ,GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB, Radeon HD 3870 X2 1GB. Graphics Drivers: ATI Catalyst 8.3, Nvidia ForceWare beta 169.44, Nvidia ForceWare beta 174.53.

At an estimated cost of $599-649, the XFX GeForce 9800 GX2 isn't for everyone. If you absolutely have to have the best performance at any cost, then you'll want to pick up one or two GX2s for your gaming rig. More cost-conscious buyers should look at lower price points where you can get more bang for the buck. Keep in mind that while expensive, top-of-the-line cards aren't for average PC gamers with average salaries, the graphics companies understand that these flagship cards create a halo effect over the rest of the product line. The high prices can also serve as anchor points for comparison shopping. Buyers who can't afford a GeForce 9800 GX2 might view the more affordable GeForce 9600 GT or GeForce 8800 GT cards as bargains in comparison.

671 Comments

  • amulbocus

    Posted Jun 8, 2008 11:15 am PT

    Gonna stick with my 8800gts thanks. Can play Crysis on mostly high settings, no problems. The real bottleneck for me is my Pentium D 3.0. If someone is buying a brand new PC, these 9 series cards are definitily worth considering, otherwise not worth the upgrade. The choice is there, if you got the money and can afford it go for it, but you cant chastise nvidia for releasing new cards all the time, its only natural to improve/develop your existing products.

  • ramtin1001

    Posted May 20, 2008 2:50 pm PT

    i just dont believe this..... quad sli and only 40 fps???? and its not even on very high....crysis u bastard!!

  • sa_na

    Posted May 16, 2008 12:57 am PT

    After so many comparisons I think I am gonna buy a PS3 or Xbox 360 at the same price of any top end GPU.This fight between GPUs are ever evolving and there is no end. I would better stick to my cheapest of all 8400 gs and buy an xbox360.

  • FstrthnU

    Posted Apr 30, 2008 9:32 pm PT

    Personally, if I had control over buying a PC, I would wait for the Geforce 9900. I'e heard that its going to be really sweet, and remember: Newer cards have more powerful hardware.

  • xatman911

    Posted Apr 20, 2008 7:32 am PT

    Graphic cards are increasing in size... if this continues then we will have to have a separate box for them with their own power supply and possibly air condition for cooling...

  • patrickstat

    Posted Apr 19, 2008 6:42 am PT

    by the way noone i repeat NOONE ever buy the Asus p5n-t deluxe!!!!!
    it is disturbing and will cost you pain just to overclock slightly, all people who bought one ALL want their money back. biggest mistake i ever made!!!!

  • patrickstat

    Posted Apr 19, 2008 6:35 am PT

    the new 512mb 8800gts's

  • patrickstat

    Posted Apr 19, 2008 6:32 am PT

    i will never understand how people say 30fps is enough, even at 50 you can almost see frame shutter, 60 is a minimum if you want smooth gameplay. and if your getting 60 as an average so what if a graphicaly intence scene comes andf it drops to 30 fps and all is wrecked.
    i now have 2 8800gts in sli a q9300 @ 3178 4 gigs or 800 ram made by elite and an asus p5nt deluxe motherboard and still ALL games shudder. my next door nieghbour has quad 9800gx2 ans stricker extream mobo same ram and extream cpu clocked at 3.8 and he too cannot get crysis to run perfect heh having the prety much best pc package today after spending 5 grand all up including cooling bits and peaces. im going to play 3 more games, front lines blacksite 51 and crysis again then selling my system and i quit. no more monkey bussiness. expensive bananas.

  • Omen-of-Death

    Posted Apr 18, 2008 4:31 pm PT

    This is so ironic, I read this article to obtain knowledge of this graphics card because I'm planning on buying a new PC to stop playing video games on the Xbox 360, but when I read some comments, I realized that a few people actually want to stop playing video games on the PC and instead they want to play video games on the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3.

  • chrisrooR

    Posted Apr 12, 2008 9:02 am PT

    Jesus that card is massive.

  • punkbill

    Posted Apr 11, 2008 12:50 pm PT

    Sounds good.

  • dacdong90

    Posted Apr 11, 2008 8:18 am PT

    it's amazing!!!!

  • dacdong90

    Posted Apr 11, 2008 8:17 am PT

    it's amazing !!!!!!!

  • redsnake9111

    Posted Apr 11, 2008 8:14 am PT

    They said in the GeForce 9800 GX2 interview with Nvidia's Ujesh Desai that a single 9800GX2 could perform up to SLI 8800GTXs. WTF? They exaggerate way two much. I am fine with my single 8800GTX.

  • deck84

    Posted Apr 11, 2008 7:12 am PT

    this GPU is awesome, new Gpu's are faster and better, I hope they will release better Gpu's

  • fishslice

    Posted Apr 9, 2008 8:54 am PT

    I have a really cheap 8800GT Club Card (£130) which I put in my P35 Quad Core PC.

    Runs everything real great in Vista SP1 DX10, and the whole PC cost 499 self build, plus £100.00 19" Acer wide screen monitor. I reckon I'll be good for a little while.

    No need to pay silly money.

  • SAM_ANDREAS

    Posted Apr 8, 2008 10:56 pm PT

    Why does radeon have the best resoults in 3dMark, but when it comes to games it sucks!?

  • DeViLzzz

    Posted Apr 8, 2008 10:15 am PT

    You can get the newer 8800 GTS's for like $209 Canadian with rebate .... I have an 8800 GT but the GTS is now the sweet spot.

  • tarmizi2005

    Posted Apr 7, 2008 9:52 am PT

    but its totally totally totally expensive for me as a student.....

  • lukvip

    Posted Apr 7, 2008 6:56 am PT

    I was looking forward to replacing my 7600GT with a card from the 8 or 9 series, but decided that they were just not worth my money. Bought myself a Wii + 1 extra game this weekend. Jolly good fun, and I'm sure my 300 EUR is much better spent on this console than on another unnecessary PC upgrade (or even useless upgrade, since none of these new cards is capable of running games like crisis decently.)

  • ConstantinNC

    Posted Apr 7, 2008 12:54 am PT

    I had 6800 Ultra, now I bought the 8800 GTS 640MB only because I wanted to play DX10, which in fact looks much better than DX9, but as olddog56 said, I will not chase it anymore, at least not for 2-3 years.

  • olddog56

    Posted Apr 6, 2008 1:23 am PT

    Reading the reports on Tomshardware.com, they were saying that the sales of PC games are way down compare to last years sales. They indicated it was due to the cost of the high end games and the cost of the hardware in their PC needed to run them. The game Crysis has really taken a hit. I have a geforce 8600gt 512 mb card and I was thinking of buying a geforce 8800gtx OC at 399.00 , but now Iam going to buy a PS3 at 80 gigabite when it comes out in july and I will be able to play blueray dvds on my tv beside games with a wider selections of games that Sony offers on a much bigger screen. I know that the graphics won,t be as good as on my PC but Iam not going to chase this GPU catch up game any more.and alot of people are realizing it this way.

  • MWILDRICK

    Posted Apr 4, 2008 5:31 pm PT

    I think I will wait a bit longer before purchasing a new vid card, my 8800 GTX works on all the current games, but if you have a older card I would purchase a 8800 GT , you can get a good deal on one right now.

  • MadlilMart

    Posted Apr 4, 2008 2:09 pm PT

    interesting, but it just doesn't seem worth it for the price

  • lazarus22

    Posted Apr 4, 2008 12:45 pm PT

    Guys, you forgot one think! We always talking about GPU card prices, but the more important think is the technology. And technology needs money. Our money. Of course, not everybody need the newest product on market. But someone yes. I deal with you, the newest GPUs cost too much, but if I looking few years back, the games didnt looks like Crysis or Gears of War. Every year its better and better. People who saying about PC Games end, they wrong! 2007 was the best year for PC Games comunity ever!! Crysis, CoD 4, Gothic 3, Oblivion, Stalker, TDU,...and much more. Everybody who buying this hardware support the developers and the Games Comunity and finaly the Gamers. I own the old 8800GTX over a year and it was the best bought for me. I spend for it 550euro, but is still the good card. I dont buying this 9800GX2 but i think lot of people yes. Thats the reality. And about a Vista i can say just one think. We forget the XP in the same way how we forgot the win98. The evolution is unstopable But the Vista is not ready yet, and his need better hardware.

  • metalkid9

    Posted Apr 4, 2008 8:39 am PT

    its funny how they didnt put the 8800 ultra in the performance comparison, it probably smokes 9800 gx2

  • unpredictable99

    Posted Apr 4, 2008 7:25 am PT

    patrickstat, I think you ought'a post your fully detailed setup w/ only knowing your graphics setup there's simply no way you're gettin that result

  • foever86

    Posted Apr 3, 2008 2:23 pm PT

    what? i have one evga geforce 8800gts 640mb and i run crysis at high getting almost 30fps...
    are you sure you're not just crazily upgrading your graphic card? because if you're you're surely not gonna get anything from ur comp

  • patrickstat

    Posted Apr 3, 2008 12:45 pm PT

    21 fps in crysis. COD4 runs great.
    but bacon tastes good

  • general_psi8

    Posted Apr 3, 2008 12:29 pm PT

    Dude, patrickstat, if your two 8800GTS's in SLi only net 21 fps in COD4 on MEDIUM you need to return them and get new ones, or stop overclocking your video cards to cook bacon every morning. Seriously, you should be getting a perfect 100+ fps constantly with that setup...

  • patrickstat

    Posted Apr 3, 2008 11:06 am PT

    all i am saying is that a top/high end card should produce high end graphics.
    one ultra cannot do this alone, it needs at least 2 if you want a game to run smooth in highest settings.
    Top end Card / Top end Graphics sounds fare right?

    well top end cards today are only alowing the end user to try useing top end graphics.

    todays top end cards are 70% efficiant. simply incapable of producing top end results even at top dollar.

  • patrickstat

    Posted Apr 3, 2008 10:57 am PT

    obviously you are not a pc guru.
    and obviously you have to upgrade in order to play the newest games at their highest levels.
    get a grip?? the cards i had 2 years ago will produce 9 fps in crysis at only medium as i still have my old pc that i gave my sister and thats in crossfire mode!!!! yes 2 cards 4 gigs of ram. even call of duty 4 is un playable. yeah get a grip....thats how a 2 year old system runs with new gaming software.
    my 1 year old system with 2 gts 640mb cards in sli make 21 fps in medium with a few high setings and 0 aa.
    yeah i got a grip alright. but hey maybe you dont understand what that means.
    2 years you say? so lets say i keep my ultra sli setup i have now you recon it will run games in 2 years time with dx11 and all new picel shaders? on high with aa set to 16?
    I DONT THINK SO

  • micshort

    Posted Apr 3, 2008 9:38 am PT

    Good lord get a grip.
    How the **** do you suggest they make a card that will stay top? Yes that's a downside of new technology, you have to buy them, but what the hell do you expect? Your old technological devices to morph into them?
    You CAN still use your old high end cards, and get this, they're still high end for about 2 more years.
    No one is forcing you to upgrade.

  • patrickstat

    Posted Apr 3, 2008 8:21 am PT

    i agree with toufiq.
    everytime i build a new pc its sh*t 3 months later, ive spent thousands of dollars in my pc's and everytime left tottally dispointed a few months later. give up?? maybe soon.... one card a year please and a card that will play all games with excelent fps please, if not i quit!!! this is a big spender speaking too!!! so show some respect!!!! ive spent 3 thousand dollars just on graphics cards in less than 12 months. make me one product, top of the line and even high price ok....but make it last for a minimum of 12 months and ill buy one every year. im sick of upgrading every 4 months, and then after an upgrade find out a newer faster card just came out again and for the same price or cheaper... this is becoming a JOKE!!!

  • martyboy9

    Posted Apr 3, 2008 7:37 am PT

    at the moment ive got a single 8800gts and was finkin of upgrading to dual ATI Radeon HD 3870XT X2 crossfire becuase my mobo cant take sli can neone tell me if im makin a mistake before i doit? lol plus ive got an 850w PSU and i herd dat each card takes 550w so i dont no if id av enough power to run em both. :S aswell as everyfing else i got goin init! somone tell me quik lol!

  • toufiq

    Posted Apr 2, 2008 7:36 pm PT

    This is really sick man!!! what is the point of this ugly business? every single year I have to get a new card to play games? Man they really are disappointing me a lot. You know after all these I think I would buy a PS3 or xbox360 or I can have both at the price of the quad sli and so on and at least I will be happy for at least 3 years that is for granted man......... It is like you know-----there are two business men...they have enough to offer but one would only offer 0.1% extra in a new product when the other person gives 0.09% extra in his new one.....Look at this mess.... ati radeon releases the HD 37** something and the next month Nvidia comes up with something similar...but not offering a great deal better than its opponent. What the **** are they doing? playing cat and mouse with us? U can never be satisfied with ur ONE MONTH OLD card when there is something better like we always wanted 8800 ultra when we had 8800 gtx or something or think about the single GPU when the SLI released were we satisfied then? These guys are playing.......with no ******* dignity and no ******* sympathy for the customers!!!! They are playing with our hard earned money....just think u can cook for how many people with $800? Damn it!!! will they ever stop?

  • Xestor_Vista

    Posted Apr 2, 2008 2:36 pm PT

    Nah I'm stick with 2x GeForce 8800GTX SLI is wayyyy better than 9800GX2

  • drcool1

    Posted Apr 2, 2008 5:03 am PT

    what about 64-bit windows vista

  • perfectsniper15

    Posted Apr 2, 2008 1:13 am PT

    so how does the 8800 GT compare to the 9600 GT?

  • _FAC_

    Posted Apr 2, 2008 12:41 am PT

    Wat about The 9600Gt!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • _FAC_

    Posted Apr 2, 2008 12:41 am PT

    Wat about The 9600Gt!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • SoberWarock

    Posted Apr 2, 2008 12:29 am PT

    Getting Dual is pretty much useless for gaming.

  • aaronscott007

    Posted Apr 1, 2008 10:28 pm PT

    I would be very interested to see comparisons between 2 of these in SLI and 3 9800GTX's in 3way SLI

  • -Origin-

    Posted Apr 1, 2008 6:59 pm PT

    My moded ATI HD3870 runs better than this card I find on XP. The card I have is DDR4, and 820 MHz core clocking instead of the 9800's 600 MHz, I can overclock my baby to 1 GHz !! The card I got also comes with automatic cooling that adjusts instantly to the heat being generated which means I can overclock without too much heat!! . My card beats all of yours hahaha!

  • fastjay_basic

    Posted Apr 1, 2008 4:17 pm PT

    Oh yeah, and my 3DMark06 last night was a dissappointing 10,220. Half the ranked scores right now are ahead of me!!!. My CPU stunk up my score big time. I want an E8500 or QX9770 *drool*.

    I couldn't frigging believe the top score from "Team Italy". 32,513 !!! They must be running Crysis maxed out no problem! Their friggin' QX9650 CPU was clocked to 5.82 Ghz !!! Made me feel like I got poo-pooed on. And they were running a 3870X2.

  • fastjay_basic

    Posted Apr 1, 2008 4:12 pm PT

    Just got my Thermaltake 1200 Watt installed and as far as the noise of either the card or power supply, I don't know wtf people are talking about.. System runs quiet and cooler than when I had my 8800 GTX in there.

    As for the games, Crysis is running smoother with effects on high although anit-aliasing is causing a weird distortion right now, especially on 8X. I'm pissed that Marvel Ultimate Alliance still has a $hitty frame rate when all settings are maxed. UT3 is smoother than ever, and C.O.D. 4 is much nicer now. I don't know if it's worth $600 to someone who already has an 8800GTX and certainly not worth it if you have a 3870X2, but it is definitely the best card out there right now across the board so if you have the deep pockets, I say go for it. I'm going quad SLI soon but not before I upgrade the MOBO, CPU, and RAM.

    Right now my specs are:
    FX-60
    ASUS AV8
    2 GB Corsair
    XP
    Thermaltake 1200 Watt
    750 GB Maxtor
    9800 GX2
    SB X-Fi
    Dell 2405

  • raza_rizvi_002

    Posted Apr 1, 2008 2:14 pm PT

    btw guys, why not just wait for 9900 to come out Q3 2008

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geforce_9

  • patrickstat

    Posted Apr 1, 2008 12:30 pm PT

    medium and ultrahigh look tottaly different. no comparison what so ever.

  • Parentez

    Posted Apr 1, 2008 9:00 am PT

    hmm i must say after reading few reviews of that card im dissapointed and heres why when 8800gtx arrived and high price tag he was able to play all games in no less then 60 fps it was crushing NVIDIA 8800gtx beats everything , and now they released this one PSU connector joke , loud , overheated dual gpu shiiit , i must say i have money to buy it its no problem for me but after a long day of reading compareing and etc i come to one conclusion only NOT WORTH IT FOR NOW . currently running on single 8800 ultra , NVIDIA no thnxx ill wait when you will come up with something serious this performance is not worth it u can buy GPU CPU and memmo for that money i mean come ON !! peace out

advertisement

XFX GeForce 9800 GX2 Hands-On Preview

We go hands on with the new dual-GPU XFX GeForce 9800 GX2.

Tags