A follow-up to last year's video card guide, GameSpot's Video Card Roundup for 2007 will show you what cards are widely available in your price range and how they stack up against one another. We've divided the video cards by price into four categories: high-end, performance, mainstream, and budget. Our budget list includes all the current-generation video cards available for $100 or less. The mainstream group includes cards that retail for up to $200. Bump the price range up to $200-$400 to get to our performance cards. Finally, we have our extremely broad high-end category that includes everything over $400, which covers both single cards and dual-card setups. We've focused on current-generation GeForce 8 series and Radeon 2000 series video cards in this roundup. Check out last year's guide to see how the older cards perform. We start off with the high-end cards this week.

High-End Video Cards

High-end video card setups encompass the $400 and over category. These video cards will allow you to play games at very high resolutions and with maximum image quality settings. Feel free to keep antialiasing (which helps to smooth out jagged lines) and anisotropic filtering (keeps textures looking good at all distances and angles) settings enabled on just about every single game at resolutions as high as 2560x1600. You can easily get away with less expensive cards if you have a smaller monitor or don't need extremely high image quality settings.

You can find plenty of options in the high-end category, and with the advent of SLI and CrossFire, it's very easy to double the amount you pay. SLI and CrossFire refer to technologies, respectively created by Nvidia and ATI, that allow you to operate two matching video cards in the same computer. Dual-card setups will give you access to higher image quality settings, but you won't get double the performance due to the overhead involved in getting two cards to work together. A dual-card setup will also require a beefy power supply, a specialized SLI or CrossFire motherboard capable of running two video cards, and possibly even a new computer case.

There are only a few individual cards in the high-end category. Once we remove the SLI and CrossFire combinations, we're left with the GeForce 8800 Ultra, the GeForce 8800 GTX, the Radeon HD 2900 XT, and some versions of the GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB. The GeForce 8800 Ultra and GTX have the same number of shaders, but the Ultra has slightly faster clock speeds. The GeForce 8800 GTX originally debuted late last year before the launch of Windows Vista, and ruled the roost for many months before being displaced by the Ultra. Nvidia's GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB product comes with three-fourths as many shaders as the GTX, and has less memory and slower clock speeds. The GTS is currently available for as low as $380 online, but we included it in the high-end category because many variants of the card come very close to the $400 mark and we needed to give the Radeon HD 2900 XT some fair competition.

The Radeon HD 2900 XT's $400 price point places it between the GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB and the GeForce 8800 GTX. The ATI and Nvidia solutions have very different architectures, which makes direct shader-count comparisons difficult. Shader numbers can be used to compare cards within the same family (for instance, the 8800 GTX to the 8800 GTS, and the 2900 XT to the 2600XT), but not between cards with dramatically different GPU designs. Note that ATI doesn't have a true answer for the GeForce 8800 GTX or 8800 Ultra cards. If you're considering only the highest of the high-end, you're going to get a GeForce.

PriceProcessors / SpeedRAM / SpeedAdditional Notes
$1350128
648MHz
2 x 768MB
384-bit
2.2GHz
The GeForce 8800 Ultra SLI configuration is the most powerful graphics setup currently available. These enormous cards will require a large case for cooling, an SLI motherboard, and at least a 900W power supply to feed them.
$1140128
575MHz
2 x 768MB
384-bit
1.8GHz
Two GeForce 8800 GTXs have all the same requirements as the Ultra SLI combo, but you can get away with a mere 750W power supply.
$78096
500MHz
2 x 640MB
320-bit
1.6GHz
The GeForce 8800 GTS card requires only one external power connector, but a matching set can still put out a decent amount of performance.
$58096
580MHz
2 x 320MB
320-bit
1.8GHz
With half the RAM of its 640MB sibling, these 320MB GeForce 8800 GTS cards might begin to falter when you crank the resolution beyond 1600x1200.
$675128
648MHz
768MB
384-bit
2.2GHz
The most powerful single-card solution on the market requires a 500W power supply and enough clearance to fit inside your case.
$570128
575MHz
768MB
384-bit
1.8GHz
The GeForce 8800 GTX was the first DirectX10 card to arrive on the market and remains a powerful solution today.
$38096
500MHz
640MB
320-bit
1.6GHz
A single GeForce 8800 640MB GTS has fewer shaders and a lower clock speed than the GTX, but it's a lot more affordable.
$800320
742MHz
2 x 512MB
512-bit
1.65GHz
Note that dual-video card SLI and CrossFire configurations have added costs beyond the price of the cards.
$400320
742MHz
512MB
512-bit
1.65GHz
The Radeon HD 2900 XT works fine with two 6-pin power connectors, but you'll need a new power supply capable of providing a 6- and 8-pin power configuration to provide extra juice for overclocking.

The Results

We graphed the average dollar per frame for each card and dual-card setup we tested. We calculated individual dollar-per-frame amount for each game for each graphics setup we tested, then averaged the results for presentation in this graph. It's not a definitive chart due to weighting issues--some games have higher frame rates than others--but it serves well enough to show which cards give the most frames for your money. A lower cost per frame results in better performance for every dollar spent. If you're looking for more details behind our testing, on the following pages you can find the individual results for each game, as well as price/performance comparisons.

Price/Performance

(Shorter bars indicate better value)

Average Price Per Frame - Quake 4, Oblivion, S.T.A.L.K.E.R., Company of Heroes

GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB
10.33
GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB
11.27
GeForce 8800 Ultra 768MB
11.60
GeForce 8800 GTS SLI (640MBx2)
12.42
Radeon HD 2900 XT 512MB
13.88
GeForce 8800 GTX SLI (768MBx2)
14.35
Radeon HD 2900 XT CrossFire (512MBx2)
16.41
GeForce 8800 Ultra SLI (768MBx2)
17.36
GeForce 8800 GTS SLI (320MBx2)
20.45

The Verdict

In the high-end category we have to judge by two criteria: cost and performance. We have to acknowledge that some of us simply want the fastest hardware on the planet without regard to cost. For those people, the GeForce 8800 Ultra SLI provides the ultimate in performance. As expected, the GeForce 8800 GTX SLI setup comes in slightly behind the Ultras. Both the GeForce GTS 640MB SLI and 320MB SLI setups lagged significantly behind their higher-end brethren. ATI's HD 2900XT CrossFire configuration was competitive with the GTS setups but never came close to displacing the more costly Ultra and GTX SLI rigs.

If you're looking to squeeze the most frames out of your budget in the high-end category, look no further than the GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB. It sailed through our benchmarks with ease, and you can easily find overclocked variants of the card selling for marginally more than stock versions. The GeForce 8800 GTX and Ultra offer excellent performance, but the premium pricing kills the value angle. ATI's Radeon HD 2900 XT comes close to the GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB, but the GTS still maintains a slight edge in price and frame rates.

914 Comments

  • code305

    Posted Sep 20, 2008 6:43 am PT

    I cant afford onne of them

  • m0th2

    Posted Aug 9, 2008 1:35 pm PT

    is there going to be a 2008 video card round up? would really want to see another

  • Jawesomeman24

    Posted Jul 15, 2008 8:08 pm PT

    you could get a 8800 GTS for about that much after rebate at newegg.com

  • kam21

    Posted Apr 30, 2008 11:27 pm PT

    sszaman009 get a 9600GT, it's a great card for great price.

  • sszaman009

    Posted Apr 18, 2008 1:27 pm PT

    Hey guys...I have a budget of about $170 ... wat do u pros think is the best graphic card for me to buy. Coz thses stuffs are really complicated for my brain to handle.
    THANXX.

  • rudeboy4000

    Posted Apr 13, 2008 12:00 am PT

    I bought a geforce 8500 GT recently and it works better than 7300 gt...

  • krisalid

    Posted Apr 10, 2008 8:07 am PT

    i just got 9800gtx;very good price and kicks 8800gtx butt

  • FstrthnU

    Posted Mar 7, 2008 8:30 pm PT

    Personally, I think that right now the best bet for your budget is the Geforce 8800 GTX (the Ultra is too expensive for only 10% preformance incarease). If you have a big budget, the Ultra or SLI GTX are your best bet (unless you want to wait for the 9800 or buy the 9600.)

  • onthe_dl

    Posted Mar 1, 2008 4:50 pm PT

    i started running SLI today and hoooly crap, i'm replaying crysis again just for the beauty of it, incredible frame rates and everything turned up to highest settings looks incredible.

  • nate1222

    Posted Feb 5, 2008 3:29 pm PT

    I'm considering getting the 8600 GT (512MB). I mostly play older titles like Oblivion and Unreal Anthology, so I won't need 8800.

  • Skyriderlink

    Posted Feb 5, 2008 3:24 am PT

    i have 8600 GT sli and i'll stick with them for next few months.8800 are really expensive.I am going to get 9800 when thay are out no matter the odds.

  • Sty1ez101

    Posted Jan 15, 2008 5:09 am PT

    These 8800s will be in the past in the next 2 months

  • _FAC_

    Posted Jan 14, 2008 2:39 am PT

    MAn They are Expensive
    I sure wish yo get myhands on one Of these

  • softh2

    Posted Jan 13, 2008 11:15 pm PT

    You see these price in forgien counteries but if we want to realize this price in the other country ( East countries ) the Price &... is very high and expensive and gamers cant buy any this such as Ultra SLI .

  • User-

    Posted Jan 13, 2008 6:01 am PT

    i have in my computer The GeForce 8800 Ultra SLI

  • nate1222

    Posted Dec 30, 2007 6:21 pm PT

    For a while I touted PC gaming. I'm still into PC gaming, but I've stopped singing it praises. I'd grown tired of the propietary issues with current consoles (PS3/360), so I tried my hand at the PC side...turns out to be even more expensive and complicated. I think I'm going to give in and get a XBox 360 so I don't have to sweat this BS anymore. I still love playing 'Unreal Anthology' with my Celeron D (3.33GHz), 2GB RAM and GeForce 8500 (512MB). But I'm going the console route on the more contemporary titles.

  • lop890

    Posted Dec 29, 2007 5:24 pm PT

    IF YOU THINK THAT A GE FORCE 6650 IS OLD MY IS A 6150 LE IN 2006 IT WAS PERFECT BUT NOW IT LIKE TRASH AND NOT THE GOOD KIND OF TRASH TRUST ME

  • CounterZeus

    Posted Dec 26, 2007 3:05 am PT

    I'll stick with my overclocked 6600GT in my desktop, it runs CSS great
    besides, my X1900 in my laptop can run any modern game at decent fps on 1920x1200 without too much eyecandy o_O

  • jhuuueee

    Posted Dec 24, 2007 10:37 pm PT

    so expensive. . .

  • voodoothe2nd

    Posted Dec 23, 2007 4:52 pm PT

    lol cookie_the_shed, the laptop I most often use has a x300... I plan getting a new one soon

  • BenXL

    Posted Dec 19, 2007 7:58 am PT

    i luv my BFG 8800 GTS 320mb but im gonna get a nvidia 9 series when they come out in feb, if theres going to be a watercooled virsion i will get that 1

  • krisalid

    Posted Dec 19, 2007 2:14 am PT

    8600 gts is a very good option

  • ImN_red

    Posted Dec 18, 2007 1:49 pm PT

    please someone tell me which one is better? HD2600XT or 8600 GTS

  • cookie_the_shed

    Posted Dec 17, 2007 2:21 pm PT

    lol... my ati x1400 is too bad even too register, apparently :-0. tell me that then watch it play call of duty 4 quite well

  • watermanx

    Posted Dec 17, 2007 4:50 am PT

    the ati radon hd 2900 xt has almost double the speed of an 8800 ultra and is loads cheaper

  • Psycold

    Posted Dec 14, 2007 12:11 pm PT

    I bought my first 8000 series card, a XFX 8800 GTS 320mb card, I was very impressed with the increase in framerates from my old 512mb Nvidia 6800 which was on it's last leg. I plan on buying a 640mb of the same card in the future when they are cheaper since I will never be able to afford the highest end card.

  • mtfour

    Posted Dec 13, 2007 9:11 am PT

    I don't think the 8800 GT was out yet when this article was written.

  • fel_rossi

    Posted Dec 12, 2007 4:28 pm PT

    i havea GeForece 8800 GTS XFX very good!!

  • nate1222

    Posted Dec 12, 2007 12:45 pm PT

    I have a GeForce 8500 (512MB), a 3.33GHz CPU and 1GB RAM. Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion looks great on it. Unreal Tournament 3 looks good at 22-30 fps, texture 3, world geo. at 2, res. at 11?x800. Would a RAM upgrade speed up my fps?

  • sentenced83

    Posted Dec 11, 2007 4:20 pm PT

    where's the 8800 gt ? its really close to the gtx on lower resolutions !!
    and my 79oo gto still plays everything really well on high settings (except for crysis - medium = high)

  • RADOGMIJ

    Posted Dec 10, 2007 1:07 pm PT

    I take it the new 8800GT surpasses the 8800GTS in fames per budget??

  • thorstien

    Posted Dec 9, 2007 2:39 pm PT

    Which card should I get in order to play Gears with a good frame-rate at a medium quality?

  • Folderu

    Posted Dec 5, 2007 8:42 am PT

    This is just outrageous my system its an old one and still plays all those games exceptionally, my machine is Pentium 4 3Ghz HT, 2Gb of ram dual channel kingmax, tha mobo is a MSI 875P neo with an AGP 8X video card ( YES ITS AGP) , and the video card is a Sapphire x1950 pro with 512 mb. The point is that all my system is CHEAPER than a one single GE-Force 8800 Ultra and i play all those games at high detail with more than 30 fps (even Crysis)

  • NnethKe

    Posted Dec 3, 2007 1:16 pm PT

    I think since AMD bought ATi, nVidia starter surpassing ATi

  • NnethKe

    Posted Dec 3, 2007 1:15 pm PT

    Ouch!!! pocket killer...

  • lik_king

    Posted Dec 3, 2007 8:13 am PT

    Is there any GeForce 8600 with 512mb?

  • millbro

    Posted Dec 2, 2007 5:24 pm PT

    Would a Nvidia 8800 GTX play crysis pretty well?

  • blibbax

    Posted Nov 20, 2007 11:39 am PT

    My 512mb 8500gt easily handles crysis at mdium settings, even in my relatively low end system.

  • DooDa

    Posted Nov 16, 2007 1:31 pm PT

    Hey, where does gamespot get their prices from for this roundup?

  • SYdoggXxX

    Posted Nov 4, 2007 7:54 pm PT

    @ramtin1001:

    The 8500GT is too weak for that; my 8600GT can handle Crysis on medium-high settings at 1024*768 and still keep the framerate hovering around 30fps. But the shader option must be kept on medium, otherwise the framerate will tank. I also recommend keeping shadows and textures on medium. The rest can be set on high (depending on your PC configuration).

  • kjhsadmin666

    Posted Nov 4, 2007 6:37 pm PT

    ramtin1001... the 8500GT will be able to play crysis at LOW settings at a resolution of 1024x768. The 'SHADER' graphics option seems to be the most influential towards frame rates; and at 'low', the game appears to run at DX7, and at a nice fps for most current video cards.

  • tjdeep_2007

    Posted Oct 31, 2007 8:42 pm PT

    no 8500gt cant handle..........even 7600gs cant handle at all.........7600gs is powerfull than 8500gt

  • el_carl

    Posted Oct 19, 2007 8:43 pm PT

    noobkid, those power supplies only take as much power as needed. The don't take a constant stream of 900 watts XD

  • ramtin1001

    Posted Oct 16, 2007 5:32 am PT

    Do u think a 8005 GT will handle Crysis well on 1024x768?? (med-high settings)

  • matt168

    Posted Oct 9, 2007 7:45 am PT

    just make your own energy from crap theres people that do that

  • Rufrgt2001

    Posted Oct 8, 2007 4:12 pm PT

    noob kid.....what the hell, besides how do you know they don't get power from wind, or water generators. Oh and there's about 100 years left of fossil fuel.

  • Hachibei

    Posted Oct 4, 2007 4:48 pm PT

    K.

advertisement
Click Here

GameSpot's Summer Video Card Roundup 2007

In our final installment of the Video Card Roundup, find out which sub-$100 video cards are worth buying.

Tags