This video card guide will show you what cards are available in your price range and how they perform in today's PC games. If you're just starting to learn about video cards, we recommend that you check out GameSpot's Ten Things to Know Before Buying a Video Card guide to get a few basic buying tips before jumping into the roundup.

We've divided the video cards by price into four categories: high-end, performance, mainstream, and budget. Our budget list includes all the current-generation video cards available for $100 or less. The mainstream group includes cards that retail for up to $200. Bump the price range up to $200-$400 to get to our performance cards. And finally, we have our extremely broad high-end category that includes everything over $400 that covers both single cards and dual-card setups. We've focused on current-generation GeForce 7 series and Radeon X1K series video cards in this roundup.

High-End Video Cards

You should consider buying a high-end video card or dual-card configuration if you want to play your games at the highest resolutions with the highest image-quality settings. We're talking resolutions that start at 1600x1200 (4:3) and 1680x1050 (widescreen) and image-quality settings that have the best antialiasing (smoothes out jagged lines) and anisotropic filtering (keeps textures looking good at all distances and angles) settings enabled by default. You can easily get away with buying a far less expensive card if you have a small monitor, prefer lower screen resolutions for whatever reason, or don't need extremely high image-quality settings.

Don't go high-end with the sole purpose of trying to "future-proof" your system. Inexperienced buyers will often choose the most expensive cards when putting together a system with the belief that investing in better parts now will pay off in the long run by delaying the inevitable hardware upgrade by several years. The problem with that approach is that a computer isn't a timeless item like good cookware or a classic coat, where it makes sense to pay extra for quality. Video cards double in performance every 18 to 24 months, and new cards also support a constantly growing feature set that can produce advanced graphic effects that older cards simply can't do. If you buy a $500 video card now, there's a good chance you'll be able to buy a card that's just as powerful and can produce better-looking graphics for $250 two years from now. Go for a high-end card or dual-card setup only if you require the best image quality at extremely high resolutions, but understand that top-of-the-line today becomes average in two years and ready for the trash bin in four.

Note that dual-video card SLI and CrossFire configurations have added costs beyond the price of the cards. The dual-card setups require specialized motherboards and a big power supply capable of delivering enough juice to all the components in the system.

Nvidia GeForce 7950 GX2

Street Price: $535 to $650
Core: 48 pixel pipes (24 per GPU), 500MHz
Memory: 1GB (512MB per GPU), 600MHz
Recommended Power Supply: 450W

The GeForce 7950 GX2 is Nvidia's current flagship card. It has two graphics-processing units and a unique double-board stack design that requires only one PCI Express slot. It's undoubtedly the fastest single card available by virtue of its dual GPUs, but it's also the most expensive.

ATI Radeon X1950 XTX

Estimated Street Price: $449
Core: 16 pixel pipelines (48 pixel shaders), 650MHz
Memory: 512MB, 1GHz
Recommended Power Supply: 450W

Set to ship September 14, the Radeon X1950 XTX replaces the Radeon X1900 XTX as ATI's top video card. The new card actually has the same core clock speed as its predecessor, but it now supports fast 1GHz GDDR4 memory, which will help feed extremely high game resolutions. The card also features a new quieter cooling unit.

Nvidia GeForce 7900 GTX

Street Price: $450 to $500
Core: 24 pixel pipelines, 700/650MHz
Memory: 512MB, 800MHz
Recommended Power Supply: 450W

The GeForce 7900 GTX is Nvidia's best single-GPU card. It's a solid performer that matches up well against ATI's Radeon X1950 XTX.

ATI Radeon X1900 XTX

Street Price: $350 to $600
Core: 16 pixel pipelines (48 pixel shaders), 650MHz
Memory: 512MB, 775MHz
Recommended Power Supply: 450W

The Radeon X1900 XTX won't be with us much longer, with the X1950 XTX arriving soon. It's still a good performer, and you'll probably find decent pricing as retailers race to unload inventory. However, the X1900 XTX is also one of the loudest cards we've ever tested, which explains why ATI gave the X1950 a new cooler design.

Nvidia GeForce 7950 GX2 Quad-SLI

Street Price: $1,070 to $1,300
Core: 96 pixel pipes (24 per GPU), 500MHz
Memory: 2GB (512MB per GPU), 600MHz
Recommended Power Supply: See site

Four GPUs sounds like a lot of performance, but Nvidia is still working on getting the most out of its dual GeForce 7950 GX2 Quad-SLI offering. For the most part, you'll only see significant performance gains at extremely high resolutions and in OpenGL games. If you love Quake 4 and have a 30-inch widescreen monitor, Quad-SLI might be right for you.

ATI Radeon X1950 XTX CrossFire

Estimated Street Price: $900
Core: 32 pixel pipelines (48 pixel shaders per GPU), 650MHz
Memory: 1GB (512MB per GPU), 1GHz
Recommended Power Supply: See site

Combine a Radeon X1950 XTX card with a Radeon X1950 XTX CrossFire Edition card to get ATI's fastest dual-card configuration. The Radeon X1950 XTX CrossFire Edition will ship at the same time as the regular version, September 14.

Nvidia GeForce 7900 GTX SLI

Street Price: $900 to $1,000
Core: 48 pixel pipelines (24 per GPU), 700/650MHz
Memory: 1GB (512MB per GPU), 800MHz
Recommended Power Supply: See site

The GX2 may have two GPUs on a single card, but the GeForce 7900 GTX SLI is still the fastest Nvidia dual-GPU setup around, thanks to higher graphics-core speeds. However, the GX2 is only a little slower but a lot more affordable. The GTX SLI is faster, but you'll pay a hefty premium for that extra performance.

Nvidia GeForce 7900 GT SLI

Street Price: $500 to $600
Core: 48 pixel pipelines (24 per GPU), 450MHz
Memory: 512MB (256MB per GPU), 660MHz
Recommended Power Supply: See site

Single GeForce 7900 GT cards retail for $300 or less, but you can slap two together in SLI mode to get a high-end contender. We've listed the standard core and memory speeds, but several video card manufacturers offer the GeForce 7900 GT with slightly overclocked core and memory speeds.

ATI Radeon X1950 Pro CrossFire

Street Price: $556-598
Core: 24 pixel pipelines (36 pixel shaders per GPU), 575MHz
Memory: 512MB, 1380MHz
Recommended Power Supply: See site

The Radeon X1950 Pro is ATI's answer to Nvidia's GeForce 7900 GS. Unlike past ATI CrossFire implementations, the Radeon X1950 Pro doesn't require a specific CrossFire master card and CrossFire-ready card pairing to run in dual-card mode. There's only one type of Radeon X1950 Pro card, and you can place two of them on a CrossFire-compatible motherboard to enable dual-card graphics. ATI has also replaced the CrossFire's unsightly card-to-card external cable connection with an elegant internal connection similar to Nvidia's internal SLI link.

What video card upgrades are you considering? Share your personal video card selection philosophy in the comments below!

1115 Comments

  • matt168

    Posted Nov 18, 2007 7:52 am PT

    no u wouldnt need 512 or 1gb vid memory 256mb is fine vram doesnt really matter. dual 8700GT would be better

  • djmokong

    Posted Nov 14, 2007 5:26 pm PT

    I need advice if its better to have a single or dual Geforce 8700GT 512MB DDR3 EXTREME GPU card? i just like to play games,and as long as the graphics are nice its fine with me. im just thinking if i really need dual cards or a single card would do.so far the games i've seen has recommended 256 mb of memory,so would i need 512 mb or 1gb o video card memory?is it better to have dual 512 mb cards?any advice would be great.thanks!!

  • matt168

    Posted Sep 27, 2007 7:48 pm PT

    where are u finding a 7950GT 512mb a budget? everywhere i look its close to $400

  • matt168

    Posted Jul 31, 2007 8:15 am PT

    could he ati radeon x1650pro play WoW at max settings fine?

  • Cheese202

    Posted Jul 23, 2007 4:31 pm PT

    I have a 7950 GT and i can still run every game i own at full settings at 1440x900 res... I've yet to find a game that i cannot crank. Of course, its gonna suffer soon as actual DX 10 games come into play, but the 300 bux i spent on it last year is a great value.

  • zephonwing

    Posted Jul 22, 2007 10:04 am PT

    7950GT 512MB is a fine, budget card right now' every game at max detail running at 1280x960 is more than enough for most people out there, including FEAR, Oblivion, Dark Messiah and X3, not to mention HL2.
    Plus, it's only around $200 now, since the 8600/8800 series came out. 07/2007

  • matt168

    Posted Jul 21, 2007 8:09 am PT

    i think ill stick with a 7900GS or if i fin the 1950pro ill buy it. but my 7300Gt works fine. F.E.A.R. at max without shadows, 2xaa 16xaf 1024x768 res i get 30fps+(i checked it with fraps)

  • el_carl

    Posted Jun 16, 2007 8:54 pm PT

    @Bennycal

    The x1950 pro is a bit better then the 7900 gs. Also, we can't tell you what YOU think a playable framerate is. Thats for you to decide. I can deal with slow fps until about 25 fps. Then I start getting frustrated.

  • unreal_ll417

    Posted Jun 7, 2007 10:08 pm PT

    Bennycal 7950 GT KO is better then the X1950pro the 7950 GT has 24 pixel pipelines and the X1950pro is running in crossfire and it only has 24 pixel pipelines

  • Bennycal

    Posted Jun 7, 2007 11:45 am PT

    Is the X1950Pro better than the 7900GS?

  • kjhsadmin666

    Posted May 28, 2007 7:31 am PT

    uhhh... yeah, the 7900GS is listed....

  • Bennycal

    Posted May 24, 2007 8:34 am PT

    also what would be a playable, smooth framerate for oblivion?

  • Bennycal

    Posted May 24, 2007 8:32 am PT

    Are 7900GS rubbish coz there not even listed here?

  • bulldog7

    Posted Apr 10, 2007 8:01 pm PT

    I agree, the tech guy at Dell should know what he is talking about. chances are you'll be fine to replace it. It's a new dell so it probably is standard PSU. But if you're really worried about this, pay Bestbuy or future shop $30 to install it and put all your fears away. That way, it won't get screwed up at all. They'll test it there and if it works, then awesome, no damage. if it fries, then they get to replace your computer for breaking it with incompetance. It's a win-win situation, really.

  • Trazac

    Posted Apr 10, 2007 3:25 pm PT

    Even if what bulldog says is true, if the manufacturer says it can take it, you should take their word since it is their computer and since they have tested them. Dell is a reliable company, so their word will help you with any hardware upgrade questions. Just never ask them to help fix your computer, you will wait weeks for their response and help, if they even try to help you in any way.

  • airwalk_102

    Posted Apr 10, 2007 2:33 pm PT

    well i was on the live chat with one of the dell people and i was told that the dell e520 will take a standard psu but after you telling me bout frying the comp im beginning to have doubts i really dont want to break this like 2 monthes after purchase

  • bulldog7

    Posted Apr 9, 2007 11:31 pm PT

    No, 305W is not the max output of your computer, it can go higher, I think something like 400W, but buying a new pSU is the safest thing to do for sure.

    I don't know what type your PSU is, but i've read horror stories of people replacing their Dell PSU's with regular ones and completely frying their computers. I'd get someone to just confirm the PSU you are buying is compatible. Or go to Future shop and let them install one for like $30 (so that if it fries, it's all their fault!!! ahhaha, no seriously, that's an option)

  • airwalk_102

    Posted Apr 6, 2007 6:52 am PT

    oh so is the 305w the current out put of all my hard ware?
    and thanks for taking the time to write all that
    also this isnt an older model its only just about 2 months old.
    ive also just been reading and i think i will get a new psu as there is a sligh chance that if the psu were to die it could take my motherboard with it.

  • bulldog7

    Posted Apr 5, 2007 9:39 pm PT

    airwalk_102:

    Hang on a sec. Don't go rushing out to buy a new power supply. Dell's power supplies are NOT rated the same as other PSUs, they are purposely rated less than others because they are NOT rating their max output, which others that you'd buy in a store do. I have a Dell Demension 8400 with a Dell rated PSU @ 350W, but Dell rates things differently. 305W is closer to 400W, 350W is even higher. Go onto the Dell community boards on dell.com and look at the threads. Even a Dell tech will tell you the rating is very different, it's not the same as others rate them.

    I'm actually running a 8800GTS 640MB on my Dell (350W); I am doing this on the advice I found at Dell.com, and it purrrs like a kitten, runs without a hitch. And it's all because the PSU can handle much more than 350W. From the thread on Dell.com, you'll find out that Dell underrates their PSU's by roughly 30%. So don't replace that PSU just yet!!!! Go look on the threads at Dell first, or call and talk to a tech there and see if they'll tell you what your max W is for your PSU.

    The rating is just different from other companies; other companies tend to list the MAX output for marketing purposes where Dell doesn't do this (cause they aren't selling PSUs I suppose).

    So ya, hold off on that for now until you find out (and again, i'm running a 8800GTS on a 350W dell system and it runs perfectly). But if you happen to decide to upgrade your PSU, then be careful. SOME, not all, but SOME dell PSUs (older models i'm told) are proprietary and require special replacement PSUs and not the standard ATX ones (even though they LOOK like standard PSUs!!!!)

    hope that helps

  • Trazac

    Posted Apr 5, 2007 3:24 pm PT

    @scoots9 http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTI5OSwsLGhlbnRodXNpYXN0

  • airwalk_102

    Posted Apr 5, 2007 5:38 am PT

    thanks Trazac
    yeah was thinkin along the lines of a 550w psu and i will be getting a GTS its all i can afford found them chep enough on newegg.com. i am pretty sure it is only a 305watt which will just have to go so if i order the card i will order the psu with it.

  • scoots9

    Posted Apr 5, 2007 4:42 am PT

    How well will oblivion run at 1024x768 and 1280x1024 with a Radeon x1950 pro?

  • kncocalderon

    Posted Apr 4, 2007 11:09 pm PT

    thx guys......


    another question

    how can i see my power supply?? i pretty sure i sound like a retardesd, sorry my English its very bad,

  • Trazac

    Posted Apr 4, 2007 11:24 am PT

    @airwalk_102 get a 500w power supply if you want to get any G80 card. Also, if you bought a crappy Dell computer, get a new power supply, you'r gonna need one. Make sure you have 30amps on the +12v Rails @kcoalern Don't get a GX2, get an 8800 GTS/GTX since the are better and the GTS isaround the same price. Also, figure out your power supply, its more important than your mother board, so long yoru mother board has a PCI-E slot

  • airwalk_102

    Posted Apr 4, 2007 9:05 am PT

    hey all i was just wondering do you actually need a 400w powersupply for the 8800gts 320 mb i think i have a 305w but i really dont know it is a dell deminsion E520 and i was also wondering is there any special you would need for this i have a PCI-express slot 16x.
    if so i am willing to change the motherboard as you can overclock anything on a dell mobo

  • bulldog7

    Posted Apr 4, 2007 12:23 am PT

    ummm, crack open your case and see if there's enough room, another pci express slot. if not, then no. and your power unit needs to be able to support it too. Saying it's an intel motherboard really doesn't say much at all. It really depends on the specific motherboard.

  • kncocalderon

    Posted Apr 3, 2007 11:51 pm PT

    i have 2 gb ram, 3.4 intel dual core and intel motherboard with bus pci express can i have a Nvidia GeForce 7950 GX2???

  • bulldog7

    Posted Apr 1, 2007 1:52 am PT

    Just bought an 8800 GTS, Kicks ass; i highly recommend it. I'm running:

    P4 3gighz, 2gig Ram, 8800 GTS 640MB. All is smooth. And I bumped that card up from and x300, what a huge leap. And despite owning a Dell, i've been able to upgrade with minimal to no hassle.

  • Trazac

    Posted Mar 21, 2007 2:03 pm PT

    Not if you have an intel board, and not if you only have one Slot

  • kncocalderon

    Posted Mar 18, 2007 9:58 pm PT

    i have 2 gb ram, 3.4 intel dual core and intel motherboard with bus pci express can i have a Nvidia GeForce 7900 GTX SLI???

  • Trazac

    Posted Mar 14, 2007 8:03 pm PT

    X1950 Pro handels most games at 12x10 very well. I was surprised. Most people have monitors limited to 12x10, so its an awesome card when it comes to that resolution. The only game that I would say that you would have to go to 10x7 with would be oblivion, which isn't much to say since oblivion only plays really well on the G80 series. That and you could go up to 12x10, you owuld just have to disable grass and some shadows settings I believe.

  • matt168

    Posted Mar 14, 2007 5:31 pm PT

    lol srry computer was going really slow so i clicked a bunch of time

  • matt168

    Posted Mar 13, 2007 4:34 pm PT

    ok, i dont really care much for performace but my max resoutlion is only 1280x1024 but i mostly play at 1024x768 but as long as i play mostly all all medium settings+ i'm fine

  • matt168

    Posted Mar 13, 2007 4:34 pm PT

    ok, i dont really care much for performace but my max resoutlion is only 1280x1024 but i mostly play at 1024x768 but as long as i play mostly all all medium settings+ i'm fine

  • matt168

    Posted Mar 13, 2007 4:27 pm PT

    ok, i dont really care much for performace but my max resoutlion is only 1280x1024 but i mostly play at 1024x768 but as long as i play mostly all all medium settings+ i'm fine

  • matt168

    Posted Mar 13, 2007 4:27 pm PT

    ok, i dont really care much for performace but my max resoutlion is only 1280x1024 but i mostly play at 1024x768 but as long as i play mostly all all medium settings+ i'm fine

  • matt168

    Posted Mar 13, 2007 4:22 pm PT

    ok, i dont really care much for performace but my max resoutlion is only 1280x1024 but i mostly play at 1024x768

  • Trazac

    Posted Mar 13, 2007 12:11 pm PT

    I would personally think that a good idea. The X1950 Pro does as well as the 7900 GT and almost as good as the 7950 GT at times. It also costs a crap load less. If you truly what a good look at it, go to guru3d.com, they have good articles.

  • matt168

    Posted Mar 11, 2007 6:42 pm PT

    its was oneo f the cards i was looking at and 7950GT was the other but should i just stick with a x1950 pro?

  • Trazac

    Posted Mar 11, 2007 1:33 pm PT

    If you can find it for the right price, its an awesome card.

  • matt168

    Posted Mar 11, 2007 7:38 am PT

    is the 7900GT a good card?

  • Trazac

    Posted Mar 9, 2007 11:51 am PT

    you forgot to mention it was better too. This is one more reason why stupid people shouldn't buy or mange a computer

  • matt168

    Posted Mar 8, 2007 6:12 pm PT

    $700 for a 1950XTX? wow u could have brougth a eVGA- super clocked 8800GTS for $300 and its only 9inches long and 4.4inches heigth and only need one pci-express x16 slot

  • KenRmaster

    Posted Mar 8, 2007 1:22 pm PT

    My boy bought the uber edition 1950XTX and now he feels jipped cause they're not DX10 .. poor kid and he just dropped down $700 big ones .. oooo weee.

  • Trazac

    Posted Mar 3, 2007 4:01 pm PT

    1950 pro is better between those. But unless you really need it, don't buy a card right now. That and buy from newegg.com, its cheaper

  • matt168

    Posted Mar 3, 2007 12:57 pm PT

    i was looking at the price thy had for it at bestbuy. but which one of the 2 cards is better to get? idrc about these new dx10 cards

  • el_carl

    Posted Mar 3, 2007 10:41 am PT

    @matt168 Now you can get an xfx or evga or bfg 7900 gs for around $150

  • matt168

    Posted Mar 2, 2007 8:25 pm PT

    should i get a 7900GS or ati 1950 pro?

    and the dude looking for a new vid card for only 200-230$ u can get a pny verto 7900GS. my friend has it and plays bf2142 at all high settings and gets a constant 60-70fps

  • Trazac

    Posted Mar 1, 2007 12:07 pm PT

    The eVGA 8800 GTS 320 MB Super clocked just came out, it only costs $299, and the performance is just great. So in the long run, getting a card like the 7600 GT is a bad idea. Not to say its a bad card, just to say that its becoming dated quick. Buying a new card now wouldn't be a wise idea, especially if its from the 7 series cards. Wait until other things come out, and then decide what you should buy.

  • kman1572001

    Posted Feb 28, 2007 2:20 pm PT

    GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB is it good

advertisement
Click Here

GameSpot's Video Card Roundup 2006

This video card guide will show you what cards are available in your price range and how they perform in today's PC games.

Tags