Panzer Tactics Updated Impressions - Moving, Attacking, and Building Armies

We take an updated look at this World War II strategy game for the Nintendo DS.

What if the greatest and most terrible conflict the world has ever seen could be shrunk down to fit onto two tiny screens and a stylus? CDV's Panzer Tactics for the Nintendo DS will attempt to answer that question. The game will let you play as one of three different factions from the war: Germany, Russia, and the US/UK (better known as the Allies). Like Advance Wars, the game will make battlefields and military units such as tanks and aircraft abstract--that is, you'll be dealing with simplified, streamlined armies with 10 total health points, rather than having to worry about whether your King Tiger tank's 150mm frontal armor is thick enough to protect you from specific types of gunfire.

However, the game will also be based on real-world historical battles. Each of the three factions will have a single-player campaign of about 12 missions each (plus additional bonus and secret missions you'll be able to unlock by completing other objectives, such as capturing a specific city on the map). The game will even approximately model the course of history in the war. So, for example, that King Tiger tank of yours won't become available until 1944, when it was first introduced in the real war.

CDV is attempting to add new depth to portable strategy games without overcomplicating them--specifically, to pick out the best aspects of games like Advance Wars and the PC game Panzer General, and add some extra elements to round things out. For instance, you'll have a core group of soldiers in your army that will actually be able to gain experience levels by surviving battles and capturing key objectives. More-experienced soldiers will be tougher in combat, deal more damage, and will have higher morale. That's right, troops will have a morale rating, and when they run out of morale, they may surrender, which means you'll have defeated them without a fight (and you'll gain extra "fame" points too). Fame is the game's currency, and you'll earn it by defeating enemies, finishing missions, and capturing towns. You'll also use fame to purchase any of the game's 150 different military units, or to purchase the services of captains, which can be added to any other unit in the game to strengthen them with more toughness, more damage, or more morale.

In the actual game, you'll receive briefings from fictitious advisers (a different one for each faction), and then mobilize into battle on huge maps that CDV suggests will be six to eight times larger than those of standard Advance Wars maps (which is why the game will also have an overarching strategic map). Once you mobilize your units, you'll be able to give orders to each one with your stylus on hex-based maps by clicking on your unit, dragging an arrow path to choose your destination, and then clicking again to confirm.

Like with Advance Wars: Dual Strike, the bottom screen of your DS will show the action on the battlefield, while the top screen will show vital information, such as the characteristics of the current terrain (including the effects of weather--yes, there will be weather that can affect the gameplay) and your unit's current damage levels and ammo. Your units will automatically resupply in friendly territory when away from enemy units, and even though you'll play through each campaign as an attacking force, you'll also be able to entrench any unit by ordering it to stay still. Entrenched units can gain up to five levels of a powerful defensive bonus if they stay put for up to five consecutive turns.

The game will include infantry units, armored units, naval units, and even air units (including troop transports to drop paratroopers), though it will also offer unusual types like commandos, which are invisible to all enemy units besides other commandos. These units won't be very hardy, but their stealth abilities will let them wreak havoc behind enemy lines. These units will become even more important in the game's highly customizable multiplayer modes, which will let two players play on the same DS unit, or it will allow for Wi-Fi or LAN play for up to four players (though each player will have to own a copy of the game). CDV plans to include a rankings ladder that will let you choose a multiplayer avatar for yourself that can change its appearance as you rack up more wins.

In the brief time we spent with Panzer Tactics, we were able to see that it will have the colorful look and feel of an Advance Wars game, but it will definitely have a lot more depth. Panzer Tactics is scheduled for release later this year.

18 Comments

  • gamescottsman

    Posted Oct 15, 2008 1:38 pm PT

    I want to buy this game but I live in the UK and no where seems to stock this awesome looking game Any Ideas where and when I can buy it?.....

  • PukingPug

    Posted Jun 5, 2008 1:07 pm PT

    I have this game and it is so hard and addicting. I think it is the best strategy game EVER!!!! This game is alot like advanced wars.

  • tnerter

    Posted Dec 1, 2007 8:15 am PT

    i want this friggin game. it looks awesome

  • Wolfie600

    Posted Sep 2, 2007 12:20 am PT

    altough russians had numbers ... there was alot of conscripts which werent trained soldiers..

  • illinoissooner

    Posted Aug 31, 2007 9:42 pm PT

    Aside from all the discussion over the real players in this conflict, this game looks like it should be a lot of fun. If it is anything like Advance Wars (with some additional depth) then it should be an excellent game. Can't wait to find out!!

  • Eldanesh1

    Posted Aug 31, 2007 8:08 am PT

    I am Canadian Myself and have no problem saying that The Canadian army was a respected force(unlike now), but I assure you that it was tiny compared to the main power's armies. "easily Russia" is not really true either. The U.S.A at it's greatest number was actually roughly equal to that of the USSR, and was much better equipped and trained. See the casualties for proof.

  • monkeytoes61

    Posted Aug 3, 2007 10:13 pm PT

    whoever thought canada was the strongest obviously knows nothing about the war. It was easily Russia. They could have kicked our ass because there were so many of them.

  • Digz005

    Posted Jul 5, 2007 10:23 am PT

    Is this anyway related to Panzer General? (PC,PS1)

  • WaterDumple

    Posted Jun 26, 2007 10:57 am PT

    Looking forward to this.

  • luengoalvareza

    Posted Sep 18, 2006 6:11 pm PT

    tony i odnt think canada was teh strongest nation in ww2 it was uk and us and russia

  • DrCruel

    Posted Aug 12, 2006 3:24 pm PT

    Turkey's position during WW II is being misrepresented here. Inonu did sign a non-aggression treaty with Nazi Germany, but had signed a treaty of mutual assistance with Britain and France two years earlier as well. Although Turkey did indeed declare war on Nazi Germany in February 1945, thereby technically making it one of teh Allied States, the official stance of the Turkish government throughout the war was that of neutrality, as they could ill afford the antagonistic intentions of either the Nazis or Bolsheviks.

    At no point did Inonu seem inclined to side Turkey with the Nazis, although there were many in Turkey that would have had him do so. Turkey's long-standing grievances with Europeans during this era were with the Russians, as Turkey had fought wars with Russia for centuries; as Bolshevik Russia under Lenin was preparing for a war of conquest, as the huge buildup of the Red Army attested, the Turkish government was of no mind to help justify, let alone provoke, a Soviet attack. Indeed - what likely insured that the Nazis, rather than the Bolsheviks, would initiate WW II in Europe was the political ouster and subsequent assassination of the hawkish Trotsky, to be replaced in power by the more pacifist, "socialism in one country" Stalin, and the mass execution of Trotskyite loyalists in the Red Army. Subsequent to this, the Soviet Union essentially allied with Nazi Germany in September of 1939 and remained so until late June of 1941, and France fell in mid-1940, making any attempt to openly ally with the Allies suicidal.

    Suffice to say, that Turkey's military and political position after WW I and during the heightening of tension in Europe did not suggest a bellicose strategy, that Ataturk up to 1938 had been more concerned with internal problems in Turkey than in sending Turkish troops on expeditionary excursions, and thus subsequent to Attaturk's death the Turkish government made a point to stay in the good graces of all factions concerned, until such time as the victory of one had proved virtually certain.

    The Turkish government certaily has many atrocities to answer for during their violent and aggressive history, but their behavior during WW II is not one of them. Indeed, from the rise of Attaturk on Turkey has transformed itself, from a repressive and brutal empire during the Ottoman era to one of the most developed and progressive nations in the Muslim world today.

    Not that this has anything to do with Panzer Tactics DS, mind. Wish it were more strategic like Clash of Steel or Strategic Command, but I'll definitely buy it when it comes out.

  • SleepyCrat

    Posted Aug 3, 2006 6:58 am PT

    Nice. A decent game concept and it comes with multiplayer. These handheld game makers should recognize, that unless a game's single player mode is very unique or outstanding then you should incorparate some kind of multiplayer type play mode, especially in competetive games like this. But this game has multiplayer and it looks like a decent single player game. I'll be waiting.

  • Payback7

    Posted Aug 3, 2006 1:27 am PT

    Hmmmm, well the game looks good anyway!

    VIVA LA NINTENDO!!!

  • Stubbie1

    Posted Aug 2, 2006 12:54 pm PT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

  • Carnage_Rulz

    Posted Aug 1, 2006 12:47 am PT

    No one cares ozzydio

  • makis

    Posted Jul 21, 2006 2:06 am PT

    Sorry Ozzydio, but Turkey was not part of the Allies at all. 'After the eruption of World War II, it announced a declaration of neutrality, and on 19/10/1939 it signed a mutual assistance pact with Great Britain and France. Influenced by the early war triumphs of Nazi Germany, Turkey decided to initiate cooperation with the Axis; on 18/06/1941 it signed a pact of friendship with Third Reich. Subsequently, it provided considerable quantities of strategic raw materials to support the German war effort, including 30% of all chrome needed by Germany. Western powers fruitlessly attempted to persuade Turkey to abandon this Axis-friendly neutrality and to join the Allied cause. '

    Turkey had also fought on the side of the Germans in the 1st World War, decimating the Anzac troops (Australians, New Zealanders under the command of the British) in Gallipoli.

    Sorry to be so pedantic but saying Turkey fought on the side of the Allies is like saying Canada fought on the side of the Germans

  • tony_psp

    Posted Jul 18, 2006 2:40 pm PT

    the strongest force was known to be canada though....

  • ozzydio

    Posted Jul 14, 2006 5:13 am PT

    "...and the US/UK (better known as the Allies)"
    Well, it is NOT truth. The Allies were countries that participated in the COALITION against Axis (yes, US and UK, but also Russia, Turkey, etc. and troops from conquerd countries as Poland, France, etc.). It is obvious that UK and US played the biggest part in the coalition, thou it is wrong to say they were the only ones in it; so remember: there were the others!

Check Prices: $19.99 – 39.99

GameStop $19.99 SHOP ›
eBay $39.99 SHOP ›
advertisement

Game Stats

  • Rank:
    7,675 of 77,100
    (down by 11)
    DS Rank:
    617 of 3,137
    Tracking:
    461 Track It»
    Wishlists:
    270 Wish It»
  • Player Reviews:
    14
    Player Ratings:
    131
    Users Now Playing:
    28
  • Number of Players:

    1-4, 4 Online

  • Top 5 User Tags:
    1. ds
    2. panzer tactics
    3. panzer tactics ds
    4. sproing
    5. turn-based strategy
  • Everyone 10+ Rating Description

    Titles rated E10+ (Everyone 10 and older) have content that may be suitable for ages 10 and older. Titles in this category may contain more cartoon, fantasy or mild violence, mild language and/or minimal suggestive themes. Learn more

Games you may like…

Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.

See More Similar Games