advertisement

Ubisoft raises guidance, lacks Conviction

Publisher ups full-year outlook after 26 percent climb in Q1 sales to $264 million; Splinter Cell now due before March 31, 2010.

Ubisoft made a number of poor predictions concerning its fiscal-year outlook in 2007. Fortunately for the publisher, those goofs were due to conservative expectations in regard to its total revenue, and Ubisoft raised its guidance several times before finally reporting €928.3 million ($1.5 billion) in full-year earnings. On the back of a strong first quarter, the publisher said today that it would be kicking off fiscal year 2009 with another mea culpa, revising its guidance upward for its fiscal year ending March 31, 2009.

Beating its initial guidance of €154 million ($241 million), Ubisoft said today that its fiscal first-quarter sales hit €169 million ($264 million) for the period ended June 30. That figure marks a nearly 26 percent climb over the same period last year, when the publisher posted revenues of €134 million ($210 million).

Ubisoft attributed the success to a number of factors, including continued strong sales of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas 2, Assassin's Creed, and Rayman Raving Rabbids 2, as well as another strong showing from its casual Games for Everyone lineup. The publisher noted that its Petz, Imagine, and MyCoach series accounted for a full third of the company's first-quarter sales, up from 11 percent a year ago.

"Ubisoft delivered a very robust showing in the first quarter of 2008-09 against a particularly dynamic market backdrop," said Ubisoft CEO Yves Guillemot. "This achievement was especially fueled by ongoing strong growth for our Games for Everyone range, where we are continuing to strengthen our leadership position. We are notably very pleased to see our latest work, My Weight Loss Coach, ranked among the best-sellers for the Nintendo DS."

The publisher's track record notwithstanding, Ubisoft took a stab at projecting its second-quarter performance, saying that revenues would see a similar 26 percent hike to €160 million ($250 million). The publisher believes that growth will be driven for the quarter by the launch of Brothers in Arms Hell's Highway for the Xbox 360, PC, and PlayStation 3, casual games for the Nintendo DS and Wii, as well as the release of Soulcalibur IV (which Ubisoft is publishing in Europe).

As mentioned, Ubisoft also said today that it has raised its guidance for its fiscal full-year sales. Previously pegged at €1 billion ($1.56 billion), the publisher now believes that sales will hit €1.02 billion ($1.59 billion), thanks to gaming-industry market conditions, its first-quarter performance, and the reception of its upcoming games that the publisher received during this year's E3 Media & Business Summit.

One game that will not be contributing to that growth will be the oft-delayed Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Conviction. As part of its financial report, the publisher noted that Sam Fisher's next excursion has once again stalled. Ubisoft now expects the game to arrive during its 2009-2010 fiscal year, which runs from April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010.

233 Comments

  • guitardude1243

    Posted May 18, 2009 8:46 pm PT

    Yeah, it's good they decided to ditch the whole "fleeing because they think I'm an enemy" thing and switch to a more sound concept.

  • cyw1988

    Posted Nov 26, 2008 12:31 am PT

    Don't do a starcraft Ghost on us... =X

  • xXxManslayerxXx

    Posted Nov 20, 2008 5:58 pm PT

    my guess is that the delay comes from a lot of AAA games that recently went out, they need to pick a date that doesn't have as many high profile games that just wwent gold, although it's a good thing i don't know much about game development but i suppose that they will use the extra time to make it better.

  • cjfuka

    Posted Nov 19, 2008 6:23 pm PT

    How long How Long

  • toyota23

    Posted Oct 19, 2008 4:43 am PT

    So they posponded this game because they saw that Metal gear solid was to good! Maybe they will make it better, lets tust hope.

  • HA_Chaosagent

    Posted Oct 3, 2008 7:09 pm PT

    They better hope Conviction be good or an angry fan is going to be pissed!

  • bababubab

    Posted Sep 28, 2008 10:53 am PT

    wow this game looks better like "Splinter cell BOM"

  • Baldur3272

    Posted Sep 17, 2008 12:23 pm PT

    awwwwwww.....

  • Baldur3272

    Posted Sep 17, 2008 12:23 pm PT

    awwwwwww.....

  • 666_Lucifer

    Posted Sep 17, 2008 5:34 am PT

    Bull-crap, i hope they have already started TCSC: conviction 2!!!!!! cause 2016 in on its way!

  • Dark-X-

    Posted Sep 7, 2008 7:17 am PT

    well, if they must..
    anyway, in the end of the day, we get it un bugged and stuff..

  • drunkboris

    Posted Sep 3, 2008 9:33 pm PT

    this is a good thing. as far as i can remember SC5 was supposed to be about Sam being on the run, cuz he's a wanted terrorist. Now its changed to him uncovering a mole, so they've definitely gone back to the drawing board. As long as they dont ship a game filled with bugs im happy. DA was a novel idea, but horrifically executed. Hopefully it'll be like CT, but with updated graphics.

  • JJB03

    Posted Aug 31, 2008 4:01 pm PT

    if they want hype they wont get it cos i mean the splinter cell seiries arnt that good im not sayin its not a great game i hav all 4 games its just that this kind of game arnt hyped like halo or gta

  • division_9

    Posted Aug 16, 2008 7:19 am PT

    Maybe there delaying it because they want the hype to build up to be bigger.

  • mankeyador

    Posted Aug 14, 2008 5:58 pm PT

    Why is splinter cell taking a back seat to games that were announced afterwards. I mean come on raving rabids tv party! All I can say is this game better deliver for such a long wait. And they better not pull a nintendo and say we are going all casual.

  • Phoenix534

    Posted Aug 3, 2008 11:55 pm PT

    This is a good thing. It means that when we get the game, it'll be better. I'd rather have a good game latter than a bad game now.

    BTW, who the hell is Sam Fischer? It's Fisher. Get it right Gamespot.

  • mehrdad1987

    Posted Jul 30, 2008 6:17 am PT

    Why Ubisoft???????!!!?!?!?!!?

  • thenephariouson

    Posted Jul 27, 2008 10:26 am PT

    I know the delay is dissapointing, however they must have good reason, maybe they are overhauling it, who knows, as long as the end result is worth the wait i dont really care. After all this is Ubisoft who dont exactly have a bad track record. Lets just wait and see.

advertisement

Images

  • Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Conviction Image 1
  • Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Conviction Image 2
  • Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Conviction Image 3

Related Unions