Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»

Counter-Strike: Condition Zero User Review

Toriko42

Just Plain Bad

  • Posted Jul 3, 2008 3:15 am GMT
  • Recommended by 1 of 3 users.
Difficulty:
Very Easy
Time Spent:
20 to 40 Hours
The Bottom Line:
"Disastrous"
Condition Zero tried really hard, but sadly all this effort amounted to a game that simply wasn't very good and could be easily skipped. Especially when Half Life 2 was less then a year away and a much better Counter-strike game, 1.6, was already available I just don't know why Sierra had to make this game. Nothing about the multiplayer was different from the original game but instead they added in some really bad maps. One of them takes place inside a stadium, and the others are just plain forgettable. Nothing really was great about them. The community from the game isn't as large as the other counter-strike games either so essentially you lose a huge part of the appeal of the game which is the custom content and games. Luckily when I bought this game I got a much better game called Counter-Strike 1.6. Funny thing is 1.6 came out in 2000 and back then it had top of the line graphics. Sadly four years later they couldn't improve the graphics even a little bit. There are some better lighting effects but other then that there is nothing worth while that would make the graphics much better over 1.6. Four years and nothing was accomplished by Sierra, sad...
The single player is a joke, it's basically playing a map with bots and that is it. There is nothing special about it and this was supposed to be the selling point of the game. The Counter-Strike deleted scenes game is slightly better but there is still no story and it fails at trying to be the intense shooter. It just doesn't compare with other games to boot like Call of Duty. What Condition Zero tried to do is basically do what Battlefield did. Make the single player just a multiplayer map with bots and make no attempt at a story. At least Battlefield didn't pretend to have a story. Condition Zero sadly attempted though.
There is some fun to be had with the multiplayer but why would you buy this when Counter-Strike Source was coming a year later. What a waste of development time which in the end only resulted in this poor and rushed game. Avoid at all costs unless you have friends who bought this mess and you'd like to play with them.
Rate this Review:

More User Reviews

  1. Bad

    Review Stats:
  2. I like this game and its nice but the graphics is bad i want it like hd

    Review Stats:
    • 0 out of 1 users agree with this review
  3. condition-zero packs up some interesting new ideas aswell as twist,,skins,new maps,,voices,,better bots etc,,

    Review Stats:
  4. The multiplayer is simply a needless reskin of 1.6, and the 'deleted scenes' campaign mode is all-around terrible

    Review Stats:
  5. its good game

    Review Stats:
    • 0 out of 1 users agree with this review

Tell the world what you think of Counter-Strike: Condition Zero.

User Videos

  1. Watch this video
    Heavy Landing
    Posted Dec 20, 2011
    by AbuSharkas8 | 0:08 | 571 Views
  2. Watch this video
    Half Life 2: Episode Two ending.
    Posted Dec 18, 2007
    by dark_being | 1:44 | 3,198 Views

User Images

  1. spider crab..spider crab...does whatever a spider crab does
    Posted Sep 27, 2007
    by d_ano | 89,040 Views
  2. **Head Shot**
    Posted Jul 31, 2007
    by gwath_lord | 3,556 Views

Game Stats

Also on:

Games You May Like

Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.