I had higher expectation for this game.....However, i agree with most of the reviews. It's dissapointing.

User Rating: 6.2 | CivCity: Rome PC
By huangzhihao | Review Date:
First, there are so many bugs that it can't be forgiven even it's a new release.
The gameplay is simple. Just like many city-building games out there, it does not introduce any new and interesting concept. Also, I agree with what others said about the game's lack of population, and it's variety.
The graphic is ok, but not that good compare to the new coming C4 and Heart of roman empire(according to video) In some way, even glory of the roman empire has better visual than this.
NOw, it seems any game involve Firefly studio turns out to be somewhat....dissapointing. I liked strong hold 1(from firefly) but SH2 and this just made Firefly unwelcome.

Suggetion-Wait for C4 to come out and we can compare them.

Other Helpful Reviews for CivCity: Rome

  • Rating:8.6

    Worth Playing!

    By Osiris1975 | Review Date: Jul 27, 2006 | PC

    I picked this game up yesterday and it kept me up playing until 2:30am. It definitely has that 'one mure turn' quality to it, even though there aren't actual turns. Let me break down my review on based on the 5 categorie... Read Full Review

    32 of 37 users found the following review helpful
  • Rating:5

    Bugs, a bad tutorial, mediocre graphics and sound, and the worst an uninspired gameplay.

    By Xiskio | Review Date: Jul 27, 2006 | PC

    Fans of games like Caesar, Pharao, and Emperor will be disappointed by this game. Beside the bugs and the bad graphics, this game lacks in many ways compared to the former mentioned games. Following just a few things... Read Full Review

    4 of 4 users found the following review helpful
Load Comments (0)