If Chicago Enforcer was meant to embarrise the xbox and the FPS games, then this game was a success.

User Rating: 2.2 | Chicago Enforcer XBOX
Ow hello, I'm Andrew Hale and you're reading my review on Chicago Enforcer. Everybody knows that FPS games are the best thing on the xbox, you've got Halo, Halo 2, Riddick, Rainbow Six ... its great everybody loves FPS games on the xbox. The problem with this is that when a popular genre of gaming comes around .. comapines are going to try and make a bad game (put no effort into it) and just try to earn money by drawing people in because of the games genre. The same can be said about Chicago Enforcer, this game is a first person shooter and it is throughly broken. It's terrible, its offers almost nothing at all, ugh it is awful it is an awful game. Whats especially weird to think about it that, you can buy a better FPS game like ... Halo 1 for around the same price (or even cheaper). Halo 1 is great, it plays like a FPS game should be played .. its not broken, and Chicago Enforcer is the same price and its broken. So if you don't believe me lets do a comparison between Halo (whats great about it) and Chicago Enforcer (and whats pathetic about it). In Halo 1, although there is no online play the multiplayer is great, you can do 4 players on 1 system, you can do LAN parties, you can play co-op etc. In Chicago Enforcer, you can play online now people are thinking ow thats more value. Well the multiplayer is terrible, you can play up to eight oplayers and if you want tp play this game with friends I can guarantee that you'll want to go out and play another FPS game (that has multiplayer) like ... Halo. Not to metion that this game looks ... atrocious, the character models are ugly, the level designs are terrible, the guns just look like crap. Also in Halo there was only load times during missions, when you die you just pop back in. In Chicago Enforcer, again not the case, the loading times is horribly broken, when you die it takes another 30 seconds to load back up and the loading time between missions is awful ... its terrible. In Halo when your playing the campaign, you can just sit back and relax and musical scores pop in and make the game intense. In Chicago Enforcer there is literally no musical score in the games so you don't feel like your in the action which makes the pace of the game .... terrible. So folks, after all said and done it comes down to this. You can buy Halo, get great gameplay a great multiplayer and have a great FPS game that isn't broken. You can buy Chicago Enforcer and get broken FPS action thats not fun. That sounds like an easy choice for me, thanks for reading.