The First World at War was better.

User Rating: 6 | Call of Duty: World at War - Final Fronts PS2
By killzony5 | Review Date:
Call of Duty World at War Final Fronts is a good game, the problem is the graphics. They look really bad. I'm surprised with that because this was made in 2008 and Call of Duty 3 had better graphics and that game was made in 2006.
The game play is pretty good although it is not very interesting. The story is not addicting but it's not bad when you fight as the British, USMC ( United States Marine Corps), and as the 81 Army Division. The characters are similar to Call of Duty World at War and I seriously doubt that Pvt.Miller fought on Guadalcanal and Tarawa Atoll. The controls are similar to all Call of Duty's on the PlayStation 2 with L2 as zoom-in, but they are satisfiable enough. Overall the game is worthy enough for "newbies" to the Call of Duty series, but not good for hard-core and "oldies" of the Call of Duty series. So yea.

Other Helpful Reviews for Call of Duty: World at War - Final Fronts

  • Rating:2.5

    First Time Dissappointed in a COD

    By joeywyss | Review Date: Feb 13, 2009 | PS2

    This installment was Waaay to easy, predictable, boring. This is the first Call Of Duty title that I have been just plain disappointed in. Perhaps the multiplayer is something fantastic, but they obviously just phoned ... Read Full Review

    4 of 4 users found the following review helpful
  • Rating:7.5

    Great but just one or two let downs read the rest to find out what!

    By 999keeper | Review Date: Aug 08, 2009 | PS2

    Great but just one or two let dows read the rest to find out what! This game is very good the missions are just the right length. They are all historically baced. You start with bad guns but when you kill people you c... Read Full Review

    3 of 3 users found the following review helpful
Load Comments (0)