Looks good but don't see what the fuss is about.

User Rating: 7 | Call of Duty: World at War PC
By macewindu1989 | Review Date:
We've seen it all before for years now, starting back in 1999 with Medal of Honour to this. Oh yes there was Modern Warfare, but other than the time it was set whats the difference. Graphics have got better and so have the voice overs (nice touch getting Kiefer in there) but i have to tell the truth, i was expecting more this time from a game that hit the shelves in the UK for £39.99. Under the illusion that this was somehow going to be better than its predecessors i bought it, only to have finished the game 10 hours later.

Still, you are kept to a small limited battlefield which by now i would have thought would be a free roam battlefield, which takes a lot out of a game because you are taken out of the decision making process and told what to do. You would be aswel watching someone else play it. The game looks and sounds great.

However, having had my expectations dampened by another WW2 shoot 'em' up, the game retains what Call of Duty is all about, killing ruthless Nazi's in Europe and bayoneting screaming ***'s in the jungle. If thats all your after, this game won't disappoint.

Other Helpful Reviews for Call of Duty: World at War

Load Comments (0)