Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Review

Chris Watters
By Chris Watters, Editor

Modern Warfare 3 sticks to its competitive, cooperative, and single-player guns and reminds you why the series is one of the best in the business.

The Video Review

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 prepares to invade New York in this video review.

The Good

  • Climactic campaign  
  • Lots of varied and challenging Spec Ops action  
  • Exciting and entertaining competitive multiplayer  
  • Spec Ops profile spreads the satisfaction of leveling up.

The Bad

  • Multiplayer sticks closely to familiar formula.

When the Modern Warfare scion of the venerable Call of Duty franchise branched out four years ago, the electrifying campaign and addictive multiplayer cast a new mold for first-person shooters. In the years since, this formula has been consistently refined, shamelessly imitated, and widely adored, making it one of the defining franchises of this generation. Modern Warfare 3 stays the course, delivering an explosive campaign, breakneck competitive action, and challenging cooperative play. This is an exciting and rewarding game, but the series' signature thrills have lost some of their luster. Modern Warfare 3 iterates rather than innovates, so the fun you have is familiar. Fortunately, it's also utterly engrossing and immensely satisfying, giving fans another reason to rejoice in this busy shooter season.

All this history and all you can think of is headshots.

The campaign picks up where Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 left off. Our heroes, Soap and Price, are in bad shape, and the villain, Makarov, is still at large. It doesn't take the pair long to get back in the hunt, and soon you're hopping the globe in pursuit of your quarry. You make a few forays into backwater outposts, but the most striking situations are when you take up arms in conflicts that consume entire cities. From New York City to London to Paris, no bastion of Western civilization is safe, and the destruction that has been visited on these iconic locations is visually stunning. The impressive scenery makes the action more impactful, and the campaign shuffles you around to different fronts within each city to make sure you can experience the battle from many different angles. Remote air support control, on-foot firefights, and tense vehicle sequences keep the campaign moving at a great clip in these urban environments, capturing the expert pacing that has made past Call of Duty campaigns so exhilarating.

As with its predecessors, the Modern Warfare 3 campaign has a few tricks up its sleeve aimed to shake you up or make you cry out with excitement. The latter are more successful than the former. A jet flight gone wrong and a chase through Parisian streets are highlights, using environmental upheaval to make you feel like you are struggling for control in an out-of-control situation. These sections are definitely exciting, but because Call of Duty has trained you to expect the unexpected, they lack the extra spark of surprise that kicks exciting up to thrilling. Modern Warfare 3 also takes a startlingly out-of-place shot at wrenching your heartstrings, but the outcome is so obvious from the moment the scene starts that you're left to watch dispassionately as the characters set up and fall victim to tragedy (opting to not see disturbing content at the outset of the campaign will likely spare you this unpleasantness). The game is more resonant when you encounter scenes of tragedy in the natural course of the campaign, but this is not an emotionally fraught campaign. It is, however, an engaging and superbly paced roller-coaster ride that brings the Modern Warfare story to a very satisfying conclusion.

If the five-hour campaign doesn't satisfy your thirst for AI blood, then the Special Ops mode almost certainly will. Returning after its debut in Modern Warfare 2, Spec Ops offers 16 one-off missions that complement the events of the campaign, letting you experience new facets of the global conflict in which you are embroiled. From stealthily escorting resistance fighters to slugging through a large enemy force in a Juggernaut suit, there's a lot of variety here. Though even the longest missions can be completed in under 10 minutes, the variable difficulty levels help Spec Ops missions provide hours' worth of challenging combat. Furthermore, you can now tackle almost every mission solo and make a bid for leaderboard glory.

Chris Watters
By Chris Watters, Editor

With his Apple IIGS as the spark and his neighbor's NES the fuel, Chris Watters' passion for gaming caught fire in a very metaphorical way. It propelled him across the country and into "the industry," where you can see him striving to be grossly incandescent on weekly episodes of On The Spot.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
ausgamer529 5 pts

I think its great its pure fun for everyone

JCSBEARMEAT 7 pts

You gave MW3 a rehash of MW2 an 8.5, and Ghost Recon: Future Soldier a 7.5....wow sad times.

Kilo0311 5 pts

Just another mediocre Call of Duty game with bugs they will never fix, but charge you another $15 for more maps that should've been included in the $60 game in the first place. Modern Warfare 1 was the last good Call of Duty game.

njs0207 5 pts

Modern Warfare 3 isn't that horrible , it just has too much cheap stuff.

njs0207 5 pts

It would be better with no cheap stuff.

Kilo0311 5 pts

 njs0207

 that means the game is horrible

gay4pandas 13 pts

its really sad to me that fps games have come down to just call of duty or games trying to copy it.  I used to love modern warfare 1 and even loved playing 2. by the time black ops came out though I was just tired of it and wanting something new. since most fps games never make there money back other developers are scared to try anything different.

mxwonderboy121 6 pts

this game got old after the first week i got it..

cylon500 5 pts

Modern Warfare 3 might have the same familiar formula of MW2 but they did it because they know that mw2 worked, so they kept going with it and making the formula better which is awesome. Multiplayer is awesome Special Ops is awesome Campaign is awesome

GhostofWar75 19 pts

There is not even a word for how bad this game is. Me and my friend put our copy's in the toaster. Im not even kidding.

Spartan_418 128 pts

Overall, Battlefield 3 wins, except in one key area: technical stability and polish. Modern Warfare 3 might be the most bug-free and stable shooter I've ever played; though I suppose it was easy for them to do that, making the 4th game on the exact same engine

Heinzman57 6 pts

Copy and paste gameplay from the last 3 Call of Duties except worse. Only thing worth playing is the Survival. This game SUCKS.

pedrote 9 pts

I liked MW3, really. Worth playing it, of course. But it felt like almost everything that the game offered was a copy paste from previous CoD installments. Maybe its true, its the same game since 2007´, but every single CoD after MW1 brought, at least, something new to the table. I think MW3 is not the case. just my opinion.

ReaversRevenge 18 pts

i bought this and Battlefield at the same time. i love the MW story...i think its best for that, but there is something about battlefields multiplayer that wins. two great games...for two diffrent reasons. FACT.

TyVad74 6 pts

THIS GAME IS BY FAR THE WORST ATTEMPT AT MONEY GRABBING I HAVE EVER SEEN. they need to quit. battlefield has beat them out in everyway shape and form. THANK YOU DICE FOR MAKING A ONLINE GAME THAT IS GOOD

TyVad74 6 pts

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

buster898685 6 pts

@raven449 i cant stop laughing over your comment its more like a freakin rip off

Nergets 5 pts

I'll tell you the good in all of Treyarch's COD games now. Black Ops:Story is something different, difficulty is perfect fix (like in WaW), Wii version showed some of the best graphics I've ever seen on a Wii (they compare to kinda a Grand Theft Auto IV mixed with Saint's Row 2 mixed with a little bit of GTA SA leaning towards GTA IV's realistic graphic style, Saint's Row 2's realistic lighting effects, and with a in between of GTA IV's graphics and SA's graphics), leveling up is a challenge but not a headache. WaW:FANTASTIC Graphics, AMAZING Audio, Co-op Story, Intense, Difficulty is perfect, and Zombies. COD 3:Fantastic Audio, Intense, Difficulty is almost perfect (slightly too easy), goes out with a BANG

Nergets 5 pts

Thank god for Infinity Ward their Call of Duty games have always showed what a console, PC or handheld can actually do in terms of graphics and audio Treyarch did okay (at least enough for me to support them) with COD 3 (problems:graphics were downgraded, more ANNOYING glitches than in COD 2) and did a AMAZING job with COD WaW (Problems:Hackers are constant not Treyarch's fault though, glitches are in Multiplayer but it's glitch free in Single Player) but Black Ops fell flat probably because WaW and MW2 set such High standards it just couldn't reach (The graphics in single player are downgraded from MW2's Multiplayer graphics, The graphics in Multiplayer are hugely downgraded from WaW's single player graphics, audio is finicky and never sounds like there's a war going on just a small battle, glitches in Single Player are inconsistent but when they happen they are annoying as opposed to Multiplayer where Glitches are Consistent 95% of them are annoying 1% of them are audio 1% are visual and the other 3% are Glitches that either help you or your opponent (a.k.a good glitches)

Maddogtaylor 5 pts

there is something weird going on with this game and battlefield, why are they always evenly matched scorewise? they are purposely staying as good as eachover for some reason...

Conjuration 6 pts

GAMESPOT: Can you post a score for the PS3 version? Thank you.

mw2hardcore 5 pts

yes. the graphics hasn't improved much(it has been tweaked anyway) but the playing field is much larger and if you have played MW1 and MW2 campaign then this one will be the best campaign u have ever played(best story) the problem is the multiplayer maps have low graphics.WAIT i shouldn't have said that i meant they're a bit empty and i like BF3 style multiplayer (large maps,i used to snipe a lot in BFBC2) but i like small and competetive maps and gameplay like MW3 and 70% of the people who voted this game lower than 4, i bet you they're just BF fans who are angry because MW is selling more than BF.frankly,there isn't a game on the market which needs lower than 4 except the ones that are really rubbish

bigbeebis 22 pts

It is a very bias.. good review. Much appreciated... not.

raven449 10 pts

$60 for Five hours..what a bargain!

njs0207 5 pts

I bought it and didn't play it much but I kept it.

TheBeeJ 5 pts

http://www.evilcorpgaming.com/forums/index.php?app=referrals&reff=34 hit us up for gaming greatness, we are a very active clan and we are all xbox 360 gamers who enjoy having a blast, while still taking care of business.

khoofia_pika 5 pts

We can comment on reviews now? 0_o Well then, nice review, Chris!

Conversation powered by Livefyre

Game Emblems

The Good

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 BoxshotEnlarge the boxshot
Not Following

Follow for the latest news, videos, & tips from experts & insiders

GameSpot Fuse

    Game Stats

    Also on: