Call of Duty: Ghosts Next Generation Comparison
Related Videos
-
Analyst Michael Pachter estimates prices for upcoming consoles from Microsoft and Sony, says Nintendo must have strong E3 showing.Posted Jun 3, 2013 | 1:38 | 5,218 Views -
The creative minds behind the design of Xbox One discuss the driving forces behind the new system's design.Posted May 30, 2013 | 6:17 | 5,967 Views -
Microsoft executive Aaron Greenberg asserts that the company's E3 2013 presentation will clear up Xbox One questions.Posted May 29, 2013 | 1:25 | 2,230 Views -
See what the essence of the day was like when our many 1080p RGB cameras showed up to bring you the new Kinect and Xbox One.Posted May 22, 2013 | 1:38 | 18,900 Views -
More dogs, servers, dynamic maps, a tweaked controller, skinned knuckles, and much more from the Xbox One press conference.Posted May 22, 2013 | 27:46 | 14,358 Views
- May 21, 2013
See how yesteryear's Call of Duty stacks up against the visual fidelity of the Xbox One and PlayStation 4.
232 comments
1 Like Its pretty sad seeing that they think people are that stupid to believe what they say about the looks of the new CoD. But meh, stupid people are everywhere, especially on the internet and the producers takes the money off them so easily.
@matea88 "A fool and his money are soon parted." This applies to over 75% of the people living in the United States.
1 Like I can't believe people believed them when they said it was a new engine...IT'S NOT. They are still modifying the Quake 3 Arena engine from 1999. Look it up.
Proof from PC Gamer article:
"In an interview with our friends over at Official PlayStation Magazine, Infinity Ward?s Animation Lead, Zach Volker, said the new engine for Call of Duty: Ghosts isn?t actually new. It has been upgraded enough from the Quake III Arena engine for the team to call it ?new?
?When we?re talking about a new engine we?re talking about upgrading significant systems within in that engine,? Volker told OPM. ?We?re not talking about throwing it all away and saying we?re starting from the ground up. It comes down to the systems we?re augmenting and upgrading, and trying to decide what is the significance of this upgrade.?
@Psycold They're making billions a year in profits and they use a ten year old game engine. When are profit margins considered practical?
I don't really care for the graphics to be honest... I have Black ops 2 for the PC and the graphics look way WAY better than this...Let's face it .... even IF CoD will manage to get high tec graphics... the gameplay will still be loaded with quickscoper losers and Target finder Lmg's camping in the corner... Ohh and the LAG how can we forget about the famous CoD lag... and suckish hit detection... Let's face it... the gameplay is broken.. no matter how good the graphics will be... if the gameplay isn't good, the game as a whole isn't good...
You'd think that with all the money Activision makes they should be able to afford dedicated servers...I mean really their servers are running by hamster on wheels ffs...
Looks are cheap, how does this affect the game experience? Mantle over cover? Where have I seen that? Oh right, in every action game over the past 5 years! And before that we had an ability called "Jump" wow.
I'm really looking forward to when and IF next-gen consoles will have a game that just hasn't been done in current or past generations. Now that would make me curious.
the mw3 character model looked more realistic!!! WTF!!! go ahead, watch it again, pause it, n compare. absolutely shitty.
1 Like The problem here isnt the game but the case of consoles holding back gaming development yet again. These "next-gen" consoles are no better than average gaming PC's.
Anyone with a decent Quad core chip, 12 Gb ram and a £200 graphics card will still be better than this so called major leap forward in the gaming industry.....Developers need to make games on PC then scale them back for the consoles , not make them for consoles and then port them as they are over to pc's.
The fact that MW3 looked better than this on my PC proves this point.
1 Like @qewretrytuyiuoi Who cares? The graphics in games are reaching a point where advances don't really make much difference anymore. Seriously graphics just aren't advancing in a meaningful way anymore.
2 Like @Atheosis @qewretrytuyiuoi Its more than just graphics...There is physics, AI, how large the environment and Open it is. Many things, things that have not been improved upon really at all over the years by majority of companies. There is this amazing thing called Tessellation that has barely been touched upon because Consoles dont Support DX11.
@Peter_Eater it should run it well, idk what there talking about. I have an amd ati radeon 5870 1gb that came out years ago that can still run crisis 3 at max settings with the antialiasing at smaa high 4x 1080p res at 30fps
It's this thing called "Humor" or "Sarcasm"... lol a GPU from 2009 can run this game on the higest settings... they're just kidding
@Peter_Eater maybe on medium to low settings, and if you turn off antialiasing and drop the resolution to 800x600.
obviously it looks pretty cool but all will go to waste if the gameplay doesnt live up to the expectations esp. after Black ops 2
3 Like Unbelievable how Crysis 1 was released in 2007 and still looks way better than this "next gen" CoD. Pathetic..
@iskaroth i know and crysis 2 with dx11 has been doing this shit for years already lol, and metro 2033 lol doing good COD not great but pretty good lol
@Atheosis @iskaroth Are you sure Atheosis? Keep in mind Crysis was released in 2007.......http://www.google.com.au/imgres?q=call+of+duty+ghosts+graphics+engine&sa=X&biw=1920&bih=979&tbm=isch&tbnid=I9KTA2cmeMCuNM:&imgrefurl=http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php%3Fp%3D59641773&docid=qZdQzMA7g3u7GM&imgurl=http://static3.businessinsider.com/image/519bd236eab8ea1569000013-590/and-heres-how-theyll-look-in-call-of-duty-ghost-ghost.jpg&w=590&h=333&ei=anukUdjVB4eUkgW6ioCYDA&zoom=1&ved=1t:3588,r:48,s:0,i:261&iact=rc&dur=206&page=2&tbnh=169&tbnw=299&start=33&ndsp=32&tx=208&ty=83 or http://www.google.com.au/imgres?q=crysis+intro+scene&start=174&biw=1920&bih=979&tbm=isch&tbnid=oJ083UNN0yYNKM:&imgrefurl=http://www.crydev.net/viewtopic.php%3Ff%3D280%26t%3D58566%26hilit%3DXzero%2Bshaders%26start%3D885&docid=fkcDU24fTqZcrM&imgurl=http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/3236/screenshot0520.jpg&w=1920&h=800&ei=yHqkUZWjEszFkwXFr4DIBg&zoom=1&ved=1t:3588,r:9,s:200,i:31&iact=rc&dur=576&page=5&tbnh=145&tbnw=348&ndsp=42&tx=204&ty=46
@Atheosis @iskaroth oh, hell why not PC Ultra detail Crysis 3 http://www.google.com.au/imgres?q=crysis+3+ultra+settings&um=1&sa=N&biw=1920&bih=979&hl=en&tbm=isch&tbnid=_8-T9c4i5NVHzM:&imgrefurl=http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php%3Ft%3D375124&docid=7Zk0ZvYYwkLspM&imgurl=http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8367/8489271008_906e742512_k.jpg&w=2048&h=1280&ei=036kUZilFsSWkgX-0oGoBQ&zoom=1&ved=1t:3588,r:2,s:0,i:87&iact=rc&dur=212&page=1&tbnh=177&tbnw=284&start=0&ndsp=30&tx=127&ty=87
Damn, the bit of game play is so darn dark I could only see 3 of the numbers on the ear of the dog that they shown in the make up of the new engines, just a show boat to sell in my book, the game didn't show me nutun, big waste of time, Let EA bring back Fighters anthology now that would be a great change in it original release with the new graphic's for Xbox1 and PC.
Why put that much detail into the dog? You only see it for the few seconds you're trying to get the crazy little sumbitch off you, and even then it's flailing around so much it could be a fucking platypus and you wouldn't know the difference.
@crunchb3rry Hi-res Attack playpi featuring enhanced poly-counts and self-casting shadows? While they're at it they ought to toss in a perry the platypus skin.
The dog is supposed to play a big part in single player. From what I heard, it follows you around throughout some missions.
4 Like No screen space ambient occlusion? No parallax occlusion? No tessellation? Sersly? Crysis one had a bigger range of visual gimmicks than calladoody ghosts.
@fluffy_puppy666 they probably will have ssao , hdao , and hbao .......... but parallax and tessellation ..........this isnt crytek or 4a lol
I love how leading up to release, CoD always shows off the "cutting edge" graphics, but they haven't actually changed since MW1...
CoD's Next Gen graphics are BF3's current gen graphics...
Wow this show that cod engine is outdated, cause almost all shooter have better engine than mw3 engine at the time, and now they are catching up when the other are moving next gen. Jezz next time take your time improving cod activision NOT milking it if you wanna the series stay alive
3 Like Not saying anything bad about the Xbox One's power (Forza looked great) but these CoD models are a LOT worse than some of today's games. I'm running Metro LL on the absolute lowest settings on a not that great PC (it's even a laptop) and the characters look almost an entire generation ahead of these models. It's time for CoD to get up-to-date instead of just being lazy. If these are what the next 12 CoD games run on, I definitely won't be picking any of them up.
You have to be connected to the internet for the Xbox One to have better graphics, physics, and gameplay.
@sexyeyes79 @Oozyrat Forza Motorsport 5 was a video. No gameplay was even shown. They showed just as impressive videos when they announced/revealed Forza Motorsport 4.
2 Like So what they are saying is their engine is ALMOST as good as CryEngine and Frostbite now? kinda sad it isnt better...
COD is too fast of a game to appreciate these details. Its the kind of detailing that you notice on slower paced EXPLORATION games like Skyrim...
1 Like Comparing any two Call of Duty titles after CoD 4 is like comparing mud and dirt.
Conversation powered by Livefyre
Call of Duty: Ghosts
- Publisher(s): Activision
- Developer(s): Infinity Ward
- Genre: Action
- Release:
- ESRB: M
Call of Duty: Ghosts Navigation
