Call of Duty: Black Ops II

Very disappointing. Playing a game set in 2025 is not realistic, it's futuristic. Please return to World War 2.

User Rating: 4 | Call of Duty: Black Ops II PS3

By sstaytru | Review Date: November 24, 2012

Played this game in less than six hours. Many of the weapons do not even exist yet, and thus, takes away from the Modern Warfare feel. World at War is superior to this game. If it is possible, keep the time line real, or take us back to WW2. If I wanted to fight a futuristic war I would play Halo.
In addition, the game should have had a more mature feel to it, as many players are over 30. It would help to keep that in mind for future development. I must say though, the story line is good, almost as good as anything Hollywood is putting out these days, It has great depth, and is very interesting. I would rather watch the story in the game, than play the game itself.
The functions you need to learn are too great, and instructions often appear too fast.
Overall, the game lags, but is still fun to play when everyone else at home is asleep.

Other Helpful Reviews for Call of Duty: Black Ops II

• Rating:5.5

  So futuristic, the enemy has acquired lag super-weapons.

  By halabino | Review Date: Nov 25, 2012 | PS3

  Well first off, we can already come to the conclusion that the campaign will be about a russian/arab, warlord/terrorist, invading the USA, only to be stopped by a secret US squad seconds before detonation of their super ... Read Full Review

  6 of 7 users found the following review helpful
• Rating:6.5

  Black Ops II makes a few improvements to the Call of Duty formula, but it's not quite enough after all these years.

  By Anonymoe | Review Date: Mar 27, 2013 | PS3

  Pros: Improved campaign level design; Campaign benefits from central villain; Same multiplayer many have come to love Cons: Same multiplayer many have tired of; Strike Force missions; Choices don't affect gameplay muc... Read Full Review

  2 of 2 users found the following review helpful