Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»

Battlefield 3 Review

loading...

Game Emblems

The Good

  1. So the first major flaw with BF (and really when I say flaw I mean "This game is horrible") is the same flaw that plague...

  2. Battlefield 3 falls short in its campaign mode, but online multiplayer is where this game truly excels.

Chris Watters
on

In the realm of online combat, Battlefield 3 provides thrills that few games can match.

The Good

  • Deep and varied multiplayer competition  
  • Awesome array of vehicles  
  • Many attractive environments  
  • Rewards teamwork handsomely.

The Bad

  • Campaign is disappointing and dull  
  • Only six cooperative missions  
  • No way to practice jet flight outside of multiplayer.

When it comes to virtual battlefields, nobody does it quite like the Battlefield series. It has a long history of creating sprawling conflict zones where players have an exhilarating range of ways to make powerful contributions to the war effort. Yet it wasn't until the Bad Company games were released that Battlefield really made a splash on consoles. As you might expect, the PC version of Battlefield 3 still boasts better visuals and larger matches than its console counterparts, but competitive multiplayer on the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 is incredibly addictive, immersive, and exciting. Unfortunately, the same can't be said for the single-player campaign, which fails to capitalize on the series' strengths and ends up feeling like an off-brand imitation. The six cooperative missions fare better and offer a tougher challenge, but only the competitive multiplayer provides a compelling reason to buy Battlefield 3. With online battles this excellent, though, that reason is all you need.

Even in downtown Paris, enemy armor could be right around the corner.

There are many factors that combine to make these battlefields as good as they are, most of which will be familiar to series veterans. Nine great maps set the stage for up to 24 players to fight it out in a variety of urban, industrial, and military locations. These places all look great, though the grassy hills and blue skies of the Caspian Border are naturally more appealing than the drab urban corridors of the Grand Bazaar. The maps vary widely in size and offer diverse environmental elements, including claustrophobic tunnels, coastal roads, desert plains, and a variety of multistory buildings. Many man-made structures can be damaged or destroyed by the explosive tools at your disposal, creating new infiltration routes or removing cover positions. The maps are designed to create opportunities for combat at all ranges, and the element of destruction lets you manipulate the environment to create even more.

Combat is not just about where you are, but also about how you get there, and the variety of vehicles is one of the things that makes Battlefield so uniquely engaging. Small maps might only have a Humvee or a light armored vehicle, while larger ones boast buggies, tanks, amphibious transports, helicopters, and jets. There are a few variations within each class of vehicle that make them better suited for troop transport, anti-infantry, antiair, or anti-vehicle combat, and learning how to get the most out of each one is a blast, even if you're sometimes the one getting blown up. Whether you're piloting, gunning, or just going along for the ride, vehicles offer a key tactical element that can change the tide of battle when used by a savvy squad. Using a vehicle well can earn you powerful upgrades and bonus weapons, but it can be tough to get the hang of the flight mechanics for helicopters and jets. It's a shame there's no way to practice flying them outside of active multiplayer matches (with one exception), though you can take comfort in knowing that you are at least entertaining your fellow players when your jet nose-dives into a mountain.

The maps and vehicles allow for a great degree of strategic freedom, but choosing your class and loadout is the first and most important decision you make before spawning into combat. Abilities and weapons have shuffled around a bit since Battlefield: Bad Company 2, so now the assault class slings health packs and totes defibrillators, while the support class carries light machine guns and ammunition boxes. Engineers still thrive on vehicle support/destruction, and recon delivers long-range death. New gadgets like robots that can arm charges (engineer) and mark targets (recon) give players more to look out for on the battlefield, and claymores and mortars (support) ensure that the engineer class isn't the only one packing an explosive punch. Unlockables include class-specific weapons and gadgets, gun-specific sights and attachments, and specializations that can make you tougher and deadlier. Focusing on one class to unlock higher level gear has its advantages, but so does spreading around your progress in an effort to be more adaptable to the ebb and flow of combat.

Chris Watters
By Chris Watters, Editor

With his Apple IIGS as the spark and his neighbor's NES the fuel, Chris Watters' passion for gaming caught fire early. Years later, you can find him aiming down virtual sights, traipsing through fantastical lands, and striving to be grossly incandescent while desperately avoiding sunburns.

14 comments
icebox98
icebox98

the campaign was kinda short, disappointing and boring. i think this games whole purpose was the multilayer and fancy visuals. The good part of it all was that the game is challenging, unlike COD which is very easy. But despite all that, the game has a poor campaign/story that never immersed most of us (at-least the author is thinking in the same line). even with the fun destruction, and cool graphics, the game wasn't much fun to play.

i have to say Call of duty is a very good and satisfying game, good campaigns, immersing storys and so much fun in the single player campaign, you don't have to play online to enjoy. sadly, i can't say the same for battlefield 3

My advice: if you like a game with a good story and campaign but not much into multi-player, BF 3 may turn out to be a really disappointing game.

NTM23
NTM23

No, I really liked the campaign. I don't think it was dull at all. My biggest problem with it was that it was short like the Call of Duty games (four to six hours). Before I bought the game, I read a lot of reviews and saw that people thought the campaign wasn't great, but once I got my hands on it, while I didn't think it was amazing, I thought it got a lot of flak when it was actually pretty good. 

All it needed to make it a great campaign was more play time; a story that was a little more interesting (yes, just a little), and the ability to get off the beaten path, 'cause it was so linear that if you walked in some areas it'd tell you you're going out of the combat area, and I would have loved to explore; maybe put some collectibles that filled in story bits kind of like Crysis 3 or Dead Space. 

I think more games need to adopt Crysis' weapon customization on the go functionality, though in their own way. The only reason I'm actually typing this right now is because I'm listening to the soundtrack, so it's in my head right now. I hope BF4 has a campaign and fixes the few things BF3 had a problem with, then it'd be really great.

antoniobandino
antoniobandino

I wonder why he rags on the campaign so much...it was extremely short and the writing was mediocre, but still ultra-entertaining.

SqualleoN_xD
SqualleoN_xD

UP to 24 players?You should make the review for pc... I think it would have a better score since its almost a different game. 

Pyertos
Pyertos

Wli zebratshe zebratshe yojaane

boatsnhoes
boatsnhoes like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 7 Like

@buying1999 Are you crazy?!! The ps3 has a way higher graphics card than the 360 (take them apart and...well point proven). Also I just do not see how you can call something that must be payed for and doesn't even have an internet browser superior than the ps3 seriously. There is no console more powerful than the ps3, unless you count a pc which isn't really considered a console. And one last thing the hardware on a ps3 blows the hardware of a 360 out of the water. This is coming from an owner of both systems.

SqualleoN_xD
SqualleoN_xD

 @boatsnhoes  @buying1999 Actually PS3 has a better processor but the GPU is kinda worse , thats the reason why HD textures are out for the xBox360

frankpoo
frankpoo

BFBC2 is still my favourite military shooter

buying1999
buying1999

Well here's the ONE game that looked better on the overpriced internet ready blu ray player LMFAO, ONE. But definately not better that MW3...are you kidding? Oh I get it...ha ha..sarcasm. But if you go with MW3 then you have to go with the SUPERIOR Xbox 360 release because the overpriced internet ready blu ray player has trouble keeping up the 60fps pumped out by the SUPERIOR Xbox hardware and VASTLY SUPERIOR online of XBox Live. "Xbox 360 is the BEST console EVER made." --John Carnack

d_40
d_40 like.author.displayName 1 Like

At least it's better than Modern Warfare 3.

sochio
sochio like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

i love bf3

Conversation powered by Livefyre

Battlefield 3 BoxshotEnlarge the boxshot
Not Following

    Game Stats

    Also on: