Ultimate General: Gettysburg Early Access Review

The burden of command.

GameSpot's early access reviews evaluate unfinished games that are nonetheless available for purchase by the public. While the games in question are not considered finished by their creators, you may still devote money, time, and bandwidth for the privilege of playing them before they are complete. The review below critiques a work in progress, and represents a snapshot of the game at the time of the review's publication.

The only feature of the Gettysburg landscape I can still summon up from a childhood full of educational...let's call them "vacations," no longer actually exists, as I recently learned. The controversial Gettysburg National Tower, an observation deck that once loomed over the battlefields from a neighboring property, was demolished back in 2000, after the Park Service's domain was able to get a few hundred feet more eminent. I gather they made quite a thing of it: detonating the giant tower along to simulated cannon fire on the anniversary of the battle. You can watch it on YouTube.

"It's the only vantage point to see the entire spectrum of the battlefield," the lawyer for the tower's controlling group had argued at the time. I can appreciate the sense of that, playing Ultimate General: Gettysburg. The strategy game takes in the hilly Pennsylvania scenery at a similar remove, top-down and distant. From this tactician's view, fields and farmlands become striated earth tones, and forests are reduced to tufted copses of green lint. Tin soldier troops cluster together into rectangles not unlike the red and blue pictograms I recall of Ken Burns' The Civil War, crenelating hilltops and cascading downfield like Tetris pieces.

The paucity of menus allows you to focus on the action.

This Gettysburg has the look of a modeler's diorama, which seems more than appropriate, given the way the battlefield's little promontories and valleys have been rendered into fetish objects over the last century and a half, to be turned over and over in the hands and imaginations of historical enthusiasts. Their storied names--Cemetery Ridge, the Peach Orchard, Devil's Den--are raised up in embossed arcs, a loving cartographic detail that extends out to the decorative inlays of the board that frames the game space. To better simulate the strategic importance of these locations, their successful seizure and control accrues "victory points" for your chosen side of the Mason-Dixon Line.

Ultimate General: Gettysburg certainly does have the feel of a board game, albeit one whose pieces are perpetually churning in their own independent motions. It has that armchair general appeal, I think, of tilting the board over and clearing the space for some new permutation: What if the Union overextended itself in the northwest ridges this time? What if Pickett never charged? It's a simple enough matter to draft new renditions of the historic battle; simply trace a path across the terrain, and your units will follow it faithfully, trading fire with whatever force you direct them toward. The action imbues the game with a wonderful tactility. It makes me feel like Tywin Lannister in Game of Thrones, sliding figurines across a map with grim purpose. I want to lecture at Nikolaj Coster-Waldau about the importance of family legacy while skinning a deer.

I muck it up almost immediately, though, the temptation to draw my units into elaborate figures overwhelming comparatively basic strategic needs. I keep forgetting that this is the Civil War, and all the Napoleonic feints and swooping cavalry charges I conjure aren't going to win the day here. Thankfully, there were three days in the whole Gettysburg affair, and Ultimate General uses sundown as a convenient intercession point to step in and clean up whatever mess I've inevitably made of the battlefield. It's here where the importance of position makes itself known: even an early string of conquests can prove ultimately damaging, should they result in you starting the next day on untenable ground, far beyond the reach of reinforcements.

The ability to draw your own maneuvers feels revelatory, but a bit limited by the era.

That's spoken from experience, of course. I'm no ultimate general. I tend to go inattentive to whole swaths of my formation for minutes at a time, if I'm being pressed hard on another front, or there's an especially good episode of House Hunters International on. But the clever artificial intelligence manages well enough on its own, and it's mesmerizing to find my troops drawing back, resolving themselves into a respectable interpretation of a defensive perimeter, and returning fire.

Sometimes though, I'm far too late, and when I finally cast my eyes toward my units, they've turned tail and fled wholesale. They're unclickable when they do so, and remain that way until they've reached some distance from the front lines they feel more personally comfortable with. In one catastrophic instance, a brigade of mine fighting perpendicular to the grain of battle was driven thusly back--straight through the crossfire in the no-man's-land between the two larger armies. It may not surprise you to hear that this had consequences on morale.

Morale, Ultimate General argues, must be maintained above all else. It's fragile: it wavers under artillery fire, and it falters at the sight of an enemy charge. It rebounds slowly, behind the reassuring cover of fences and trees, or under a general's calming stewardship. It's one of the few facets of battle the otherwise minimalistic interface stoops to representing with a hard number, though even that's hardly necessary. You can feel morale shifting behind the battle lines' ebb and flow, sense the hesitation in a decimated unit when you try to usher it back into the line of fire.

Battles hinge on your units' ability to endure.

There are no routs in Ultimate General: Gettysburg. Even in the most lopsided victories the game can muster, tens of thousands lie dead for both Union and Confederacy. Absent options to mitigate all that death, I find myself nursing egos instead: fretting over exposed brigades, marveling at units asked to endure attack after attack, and pitying those who have clearly endured too much. There's a wonderful granularity to that sort of empathy, something that isn't normally legible from this high up, from this long passed.

What's There?

A variable, single-player Gettysburg scenario that spans the battle's three days, changing based on control of the field.

What's To Come?

Multiplayer, along with additional weekly patches that continue to tweak balance and add cosmetic features.

What Does it Cost?

$9.99 during early access, with the price expected to rise at full release.

When Will it Be Finished?

Late summer.

What's the Verdict?

Ultimate General: Gettysburg's early access status shouldn't deter anyone from its balanced, expressive take on warfare. Its stripped-down interface and slightly ponderous pace direct your focus to where it's best served: on terrain, tactics, and morale.

Written By

Want the latest news about Ultimate General: Gettysburg?

Ultimate General: Gettysburg

Ultimate General: Gettysburg

Follow

Discussion

25 comments
nl_skipper
nl_skipper

I have very little interest in American history, but this looks like a neat strategy game,  likely to give it a shot upon full release.

nikolako1
nikolako1

the game look pretty good.The graphics looks interesting.

genjuroT
genjuroT

Reminds me of Sid Meier's Gettysburg.

Caldrin
Caldrin

Picked this up as it was quite cheap and I am interested in another game the company is making http://www.navalaction.com/ so thought i would throw some cash their way.

Anyway I was quite surprised that this is actually a fun game and no battle turns out the same. A.I. is pretty bloody good.

I guess the UI could do with a bit of work but for an early access game it works well and is already enjoyable.


Bellum_Sacrum
Bellum_Sacrum

Very shallow and wildly inaccurate. This shameless cash-in on history fails both as a history lesson and an actual video game. This is Facebook game material.

prats93
prats93

A very intelligent, stripped-down RTS game. It's basically Total War lite but without the shitty AI. Just ignore the moronic negative reviews on Steam claiming it's not an accurate representation of the Civil War or that it lacks depth.

oflow
oflow

Pretty fun if you like rts games been playing it since release it's still pretty early though but is fun worth $10

Varasalvi
Varasalvi

Gamespot does Early Access reviews? I like it.

oflow
oflow

It's actually fairly accurate as far as units and commanders go. The way the game plays out depending on what you do in the battles the next scenario changes. The only thing I'm not a huge fan of is the battle timer.

Caldrin
Caldrin

@Bellum_Sacrum its certainly not shallow.. no idea how accurate it is to history I am afraid but at the end of the day you clearly dont want it to be historically accurate here as you would not how the battle turns out so would be pointless playing..

xsonicchaos
xsonicchaos

@Bellum_Sacrum 

I never got that with the inaccurate history in video games. If a video game would be strictly based on history, it would probably be one of those museum documentaries. How the hell can it be a history lesson when you can interactively alter the battle scene. On the other hand, it might be something in the background I'm missing. I don't know, I never touch early access.

Rotondi
Rotondi

@Varasalvi They're typically filled with typos, incomplete thoughts and unfinished sentences.  

olddadgamer
olddadgamer

@xsonicchaos @Bellum_Sacrum I just find the history aspect of games weird.  I mean, Gettysburg happened.  It happened a certain way.  The way it happened pretty much illustrated the important parts of the field, how to win, how not to.  If the armies in the game, and the AI, are accurate, then you know what to do.  If they aren't, then what are you playing?  A war game on a map of Gettysburg, PA. So why not just make a good war game with good AI and put it anywhere?

Caldrin
Caldrin

@olddadgamer @xsonicchaos @Bellum_Sacrum its a what if scenario.. like what if this one general didnt do this at that time.. or did not take that hill and instead held back defending another area.. or what if instead of defending that general threw everything he had at one position.. and so on.. I think thats the point of the game and not to see an Historical accurate gettysburg play out in front of you.



xsonicchaos
xsonicchaos

@olddadgamer 

Well, like I said, I don't know about these details of the game, but if that's true, the devs should be ashamed for their poor research.

noah364
noah364

@olddadgamer @xsonicchaos @Bellum_Sacrum The only problem is that, if the AI was just as good as an actual Confederate or Union general, then the game would be unfairly difficult. I don't know if you've heard, but playing as the Confederate you'd be facing a Union whose units vastly outnumber yours, and playing as Union you'd be facing a Confederate whose generals are so bloody good that they're superior strategic thinking womps you at every turn.


Games aren't meant to simulate history, or simulate real life. They're meant to be fun, and it sounds like Ultimate General: Gettysburg is.