PS3 sales spike 288% in Japan, no US FFXIII demo on Blu-ray

Enterbrain credits JPRG demo for two-month sales jump; producer Yoshinori Kitase says Advent Children Blu-ray option put aside, PSN and XBL download now being considered.

by

Over the past two months, Famitsu publisher Enterbrain reported that the PlayStation 3 outsold the Wii in Japan during March and April. Today, the company told Yahoo Japan that a major reason the two-month period saw PS3 sales spike 288 percent year-over-year was the April 16 release of the Final Fantasy XIII demo. A sample of the widely anticipated Japanese role-playing game was included in the Blu-ray disc Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children Complete, which features the 2005 computer-generated film based on the titular game.

The PS3 won't get a pick-me-up from Advent Children sales.

Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that the PS3 will be getting a similar boost stateside. Following months of official silence from Square Enix USA and Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, which is distributing Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children Complete in North America, confirmation has apparently come that the US version will not have the FFXIII demo.

"The type of demo version we released in Japan, we currently have no plan of doing that abroad," producer Yoshinori Kitase told Videogamer.com. The reason for the omission was "partly because we are going to carry on with the project alongside the Xbox [360] version, so we really can't just make it available only for the PS3." Square Enix is now considering releasing it at as download on the PlayStation Network and Xbox Live, said Kitase.

Though neither Sony Pictures nor Square Enix would officially confirm nor deny them, Kistane's comments indicate that the "Exclusive Sneak Peek at FINAL FANTASY XIII" listed on the Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children Complete table of contents is only a trailer. Though Sony reps say the company has still not officially announced a release date for the Blue-ray disc, retailers such as Amazon are listing it as going on sale June 2. It is already available on DVD and UMD domestically.

Discussion

430 comments
Sherwinb
Sherwinb

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

insanitycheck7
insanitycheck7

Multiple DVDs is awesome! Gives me a chance to stretch my legs.

ChinoStylz
ChinoStylz

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

ChinoStylz
ChinoStylz

Well its a good thing I got the Japanese release when it came out. ;)

arodmell
arodmell

I was so looking forward to gettin my hands on the demo too. Suppose I better learn Japanese then......

nerd_assassin
nerd_assassin

I just want to add up to the issue at hand with the multiple discs... Ok, one possible thing is that FFXIII might be not that linear and would require exploring back places. If that's the case, it's also a possibility that a certain area's data only exists on one disc. And in that case, there would be disc switching occuring not just every after 10 hours. I know Star Ocean 4 works that way. Another possibility is that the game might be so linear, and on that case a data required for exploring past places may occur on the current disc that is being played, or that only the event codes or specific event items and codes unique are stored on each disc and the area data(world map) is still stored on each disc, much like the case of final fantasy 7. When that happens, disc switching may occur with less frequency. It all comes down to disc optimization and what works well with the game. And with the PS3, being about a single blu-ray disc, there's also two scenarios that I imagine. First, there's this possibility of a one-time install, which would prevent game lags and shorten loading times. This would cost a big chunk of the PS3's HD, but then if the game would run smoothly through that then I rest my case. Second, there's this possibility of mimicking the MGS4 style, which would require you to pause after every end of a chapter to install data for quick loading. That might work well also. I think there's a slim chance of this game not having to be installed, because this is going to be massive, and I don't want some lag times. I don't care if the blu-ray is slow as others say, it all comes down to hardware optimization, and if that means installation, sure why not. I've even installed the data for Naruto Ninja Storm(I know it's kind of lame, but I'm a naruto fan, and my brother's an 8 yr old kid). And I'm thinking about 60 hours of gameplay with this one, might be even 80, but it might get boring. I'm hoping for some balance. I do think that the gameplay's kind of nice. They kind of revamped their turn-base formula to make it like a 3-step one, so that you can prompt to move early on, or wait until the guage fulls up so you can chain up three moves. It's not that simple, I think, and the game pushes you to consider every move since there's a ranking system by the end of a battle. I'm kind of relieved by that seeing that they've changed the formula once again leaving FFXII's confusing "turn-based MMORPG" style of gameplay. I think other games have this kind of combat system but I'm really anticipating what FFXIII will deliver.

MTMind2
MTMind2

@k0r3aN_pR1d3 the devs have confirmed it will be on multiple dvds for the 360 version, they just havent said how many dvds as yet. however, i dont see it as a problem. how many hours of gameplay is there going to be in ffxiii? lets say its 40 hours and it comes on 4 dvds, to make the maths easy. then that would be 10 hours of gameplay per dvd. so not an issue unless you want to play the whole game in one sitting. :-)

k0r3aN_pR1d3
k0r3aN_pR1d3

Who cares about FFXIII on the 360? Because of the inherent limitations of the size of a DVD, Xbox owners will probably have to deal with multiple discs while PS3 owners would only need to deal with one disc. Assuming FF13 is around 30 or so GB, which is heavily possible, that is about 3-4 discs for the Xbox version.

ico92
ico92

you know what ,unlike the gamecube and the sega saturn and the turbo grafx 16 the ps3 is actually a good system its just expensive thats all in fact IMO its the best console of this gen and by FAAR the best console sony has ever built its a shame people dont see the true qualitites of the ps3 because it seems consumers dont know anything about it they just look at the price and walk away oph well after this year there gonna miss out.

Noctobum
Noctobum

Sweet consoles wars! Thought I'd join =) Actually I just wanted to comment on the comments directed or made by SalarianChemist. As much as I love the fact that you are trying not to be a fanboy/biased/trolling or what not, it appears that I'd have to agree with CorruptGamerGX's comment. Since FFXI was developed for PS2 and can be playable on the PS3, there is no rush in releasing a PS3 only version for the game. Also, third party exclusives are starting to die out and more companies are beginning to port to both PS3's and 360. There are games that are being released in Japan for the PS3 that the western market are not able to get a hold of, some of these are JRPGs. Finally, this is a bloody demo. It makes sense why they aren't releasing it on Blu-ray because of the port to the 360. Be happy that they are thinking of allowing it to be a DLC. I'd say more but its already been said. I'll probably get this game on my PS3 and not the 360 since it was primarily developed for the PS3.

SephireX
SephireX

From looking at the videos of the demo, there really isn't much else to discover. The gameplay in the demo seems too simple for an ff game and I hope the final product has more complexity and depth. The music and graphics were impressive though. The gameplay just seemed too simplistic. Though, the demo is obviously based at the beginning or near the beginning of the game and one can't expect it to be that difficult either at that point. It is interesting that the game engine in the demo won't even be the one used in the final game. If that is the case, hoe credible is the demo? Thus, I wouldn't be hugely hyped about playing this demo but I would be hyped about playing a different one based on another part of the game or the same part with the new engine.

nerd_assassin
nerd_assassin

@SalarianChemist I'll be speaking to you on the PM. TO everyone, especially to the moderators and you, I'm really sorry for my actions and for not reading the ToS before saying anything. It's really my fault. I've been warned a few times already and I'll be cautious from now on. No harm intended. Thanks. Ok, to go back into topic. I really don't have a lots of rebuttals to throw in, since about 4 people mentioned the point already. Also, I don't really care if there is proof or no proof of FFXIII Versus being developed for the X360, because the tools used are the same, so it's just a matter of code manipulation to make it work on the other(hence, a port, no matter how long, as long as it plays on the other just as well), as well as the packaging and disc optimization since it will be like 3-4disc if FFXIII Versus is a true blu-ray game. Thing is, FFXI has nothing to do with it since the tools used is different and the audience is different as well. And actually there are more Squeenix games, or in general JRPGs in the X360 than in PS3. But since then, sales are not as much comparable as with Gears of War and Halo and other X360 blockbusters. Even Tales of Vesperia is being ported because of "lack of sales" in Japan probably(my opinion, no such facts stated. And with this JRPG ports, the Tekken and other Namco titles that are supposed to be PS3-only is given justice. It proves that devs are more into the market shares as of this point). So it all comes down to marketability. If a more considerable amount of units are pushed on the PS3 than on the X360(In NA territories) , the possibility of X360 getting the FFXIII Versus is slim. But if there are equal, or a more considerable amount of units sold on the X360 than on the PS3, then it should provide the data needed by Squeenix to once again break their honour and pronounce that FFXIII Versus is indeed, going multiplatform. I hate businesses, it makes people with dignity lost such just to add sales. After all, they're businesses. Consumers' opinion on something like winning a fanboy war for hardware and software sales is not as important as for them to deliver titles to as much people as possible and earn just as much. After all, the only alarming thing to be noticed from declining hardware sales is the beginning of lack of third-party developer support. In my opinion, the PS3 still have it strong(because if you say it's weak on it's early years, it's gaining momentum.), and their exclusives is just as powerful as the others(even though many people will still push to others that MGS4 is a long movie rather than a game). I also don't think that the PS3 is a failure. I don't know facts as they are, but yeah it's an expensive piece of hardware but it still sells. I can only imagine what would happen if a price drop occurs...let's say...about a hundred or more dollars chopped off. That's a mess. It'll probably change charts in a sensational way, with all of the good games coming this year and forth on all consoles and handhelds. @DepressionMoon While I do not agree with your comment(because ACC is still a slight different with the original AC with additional content as well, and that's reason enough), I agree that it is practically the reason why people with PS3 want to buy it(because other people only have a stand-alone blu-ray player), or the reason why people would want to buy a PS3 packaged with that(oh the box....*drools*). We want the demo as much as the Japs do. After all, we've been waiting too. And some bought the PS3 for that reason alone(before the announcement that it will be a multiplatform). It's really really disappointing.

TehUndeadHorror
TehUndeadHorror

Exactly what DepressionMoon said! This is so disappointing... I was so gunna buy it but now there's really no point.

DepressionMoon
DepressionMoon

not putting it in in Advent Children Complete? You know thats practically the reason why people want to buy it in the first place.

brendanhunt1
brendanhunt1

really the only thing stopping ps3 from overtaking xbox is not the games, but the price. ps3 has a huge selection of great games for ever genre but its just to expensive for some people

booyakashah
booyakashah

In fact by your logic, Nintendo 64 & Sega Saturn are failures compared to PlayStation; Dreamcast, Xbox & Gamecube are failures compared to PlayStation 2 ....Uhm... yeah. Yeah, I think that's a pretty accurate breakdown of sales figures for those systems. I mean... as awesome as the Dreamcast was, it was awful in sales. Same with the Saturn - actually, I wouldn't call the Saturn awesome to begin with. And the 64 was way outclassed by the Playstation in terms of game selection - same with the Xbox, GC and the PS2! ...Yeah- y'know- really... those systems WERE failures compared to the PS and the PS2! (Sony just seems to have forgotten that it's a matter of game selection and variety in titles that was the cause of their overwhelming success in the last two generations...)

CorruptGamerGX
CorruptGamerGX

SalarianXbot Please try to understand that it is not my "opinion" that the Playstation 3 is a "sales failure." Anyone who points out that the PS3 is a very distant last place in terms of worldwide sales is not being a fanboy or a troll. When people point out that the Playstation 3 is a failure in the area of sales, it is a 100% fact, not an opinion. How is PS3 a failure? You are aware that PS3 is on its way of surpassing GC and Xbox's sales in only 2.5 years and it costs twice the price of everything on the market. In fact by your logic, Nintendo 64 & Sega Saturn are failures compared to PlayStation; Dreamcast, Xbox & Gamecube are failures compared to PlayStation 2, and Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 are failures compared to the Wii. I guess this is 100% FACT as well? It's not like I said this as a "troll" or a "fanboy." I also pointed out that I honestly didn't think the Xbox 360 would get FF13 Verus in Japan, since Xbox 360 won't see FF13 in Japan. You're right, you said it as a tranboy instead. THERE is no proof that Versus XIII is being made for Xbox 360. Run around the internets all you want, but not one single article from the gaming media will mention any of this. Xbox 360 getting a crappy MMO with Final Fantasy slapped on it doesn't mean it is entitled to get any other game from the series. It also doesn't matter if it got a "Final Fantasy" first because FFXI was previously released on PS2 and IS playable on a 20GB, 60GB and early 80GB PS3. Oh I see now, you're dying to give the imginary 360 port a 9.5 and the PS3 version a 6.0 like all Sony's previous exclusives.

aurora_born_93
aurora_born_93

I'vé said this before and i'll say it again: It seems kind of stupid to me that the US version of Advent Children Complete won't be receiving the demo since we are waiting just as long as japanese gamers. Heck, we're waiting even longer than them. Square Enix should give us something to keep hope for other than a 2010 release date. Well, at least the fact that Xbox owners won't even get Final Fantasy Versus XIII puts a smile on my face. And Xbox owners: don't complain that you guys won't get FFVXIII, you guys got SO4 so don't be angry that PS3 owners get the good stuff and you don't. Sorry, you picked the wrong console.

GentlemanGamer
GentlemanGamer

Not surprised by this at all. I live in Japan and the amount of advertising and point of sale this package has been getting is huge. PS3s are actually sold out here at the moment in alot of places and while its not as hard to find one as it was to find a DS a few years back it is very impressive sales. Xbox has been pushing its SquareEnix exclusive RPGs for almost a year now and it doesn't seem to have had the effect they wanted on sales - mainly because they are a bit rubbish. Don't really care what system I get it on to be honest, I will wait and see the reviews.

blazey09
blazey09

I cant wait for this game to come out. People really shouldnt complain that this is going to be on 360 its just basic business learn that well young ppl. I personally will just pick up the ps3 version (i have both 360 and ps3) for the fact that im just tired of rpgs that have 3 to 4 discs and i hate the way they package them in the case but thats jsut me i dont know about you ppl lol

Gammet25
Gammet25

It said at the end that ACC is available at dvd and umd domestically, does this mean i could find Advent Children Complete in a DVD store right now?

Malco_Vincenzo
Malco_Vincenzo

@ SalarianChemist "Xbox 360 will get FF13 Versus in western markets is true." where'd you read this garbage?

Malco_Vincenzo
Malco_Vincenzo

@ TheArcade "Why insult a man who doesn't even work for the company anymore?" bill gates is the non executive chairman of microsoft, so he still works for the company. Nice try.

im-a-roustabout
im-a-roustabout

And Shtinky you make a very good point. Also don't forget Sony is one of the main reason why DVD actually took off! I for one have hundreds now all thanks to when I was given a ps2 for b-day.

im-a-roustabout
im-a-roustabout

whoa whoa whoa! lets not get ahead of ourselves here! Some of us don't have large drives. I for one have the 360 and like NO gb left for a game like ff13. I pray they don't just make it a download! I have a ps1 2 psp and I never had the cash to buy the 3rd one till it goes down just a lil bit more. I actually won the 360 from a best buy drawing :) Otherwise i would STILL not be next gen!

Grim_Reaper007
Grim_Reaper007

@ BLuFAlc0n That doesn't make any sense, Final Fantasy was originally a Nintendo exclusive, then came exclusive to Sony, so having it come on 360 now makes no difference, lots of my friends own a 360 and it would be cool to share the experience with them as well, no reason to get upset that more people get to enjoy the franchise.

Decrate
Decrate

games are becoming more and more expensive to develop. so if its on the 360 or ps3 it doesnt matter they are trying to get as many sales as possible. if they stick to just 1 console they will make less than 50% revenue of what could have been made if they sold it on both consoles. more money = more developers and time to make games = better games

MTMind2
MTMind2

"The Final Fantasy series has officially died, because of a 360 port..." well, you can continue to sulk in a corner over nothing, the rest of us will look forward to enjoying ffxiii upon it's release, even if we have to wait.

BLuFAlc0n
BLuFAlc0n

SE has died................. R.I.P. The Final Fantasy series has officially died, because of a 360 port....

beny_pimpster
beny_pimpster

lol i dont actually mind it being release on xbox (thank God MG4 is ps3 exclusive thanks Kojima!) it means more profit for square-enix and more good games to come heck they might make FM6 lol

TheArcade
TheArcade

@Midnightshade29: Why insult a man who doesn't even work for the company anymore? I'm not sure his family would appreciate such hateful insults. Microsoft is just a computer softeware company that happens to make games. They aren't some evil entity hell bent on destroying the world. Get a grip!

Midnightshade29
Midnightshade29

Damn M$ again, I hate the new SE pres. Wada needs to stop sleeping with bill gates....it's just gross, and wrong! Is this why we don't see ff7 on NA psn but Japan gets it? I bet m$ pays them to not put playstation 1 games on psn in north america. I hate MS with a pasion!

brendanhunt1
brendanhunt1

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

brendanhunt1
brendanhunt1

@odoyle420 yea their all published by sony mgs4, haze, time crisis 4, are the only games i know on disk that were not published by sony and are exlusives heavy rain is third party but published by sony

odoyle420
odoyle420

@shii666 Sorry was not aware that naughty dog and sucker punch were part of sony thought that they were third party.

shii666
shii666

@odoyle420 Both Infamous, and Uncharted are first party. The rest were third party.

odoyle420
odoyle420

@Brendanhunt1 I know that sony has holds in them but they are not owned by sony or published(at least I think) by sony so I see them as third party great point though. Many people would see it my way but many people would also see it yours too.

brendanhunt1
brendanhunt1

@odoyle420 well i think they are classified as first party because sony owns holdings in the companys, however mgs4 was made by konami which sony is really good friends with

brendanhunt1
brendanhunt1

@SalarianChemist i wouldn't say 22 million ps3 sold would be considered a failure (note that the ps3 is more expensive), ps3 has sold more in europe and japan than xbox however microsoft does have a huge lead in america. also your point on exclusive anouncements with ps3 being broken, dont forget it dosnt mean the game wont be on ps3, its also why i think sony has done a good move to concentrate on first party games. also i dont think ps3 will get any were close to ps2 sales but ps3 was selling at a similar rate to the ps2 not long ago, i think ps3 might come close to 60 to 70 million units http://vgchartz.com/hwlaunch.php?cons1=Wii®1=------&cons2=PS3®2=All&cons3=PS2®3=All&weeks=156 Its all about how much money made, which is were nintendo wins with an impressive $18billion revenue, something sony or microsoft are no where near. most of the things you say that are fact are opinion, saying games are better on xbox360 is fact because of sales figures does not make it fact, no offence

brendanhunt1
brendanhunt1

@odoyle420 all thoes games you said except mgs4 are first party

odoyle420
odoyle420

@salarianchemist Some third party exclusive games on the ps3 are mgs4, resistance fall of man, resistance 2, ratchet and clank series, infamous, uncharted, and little big planet. You can not really say that if a company says that a game is only going to be on the ps3 that they are lying. And big deal the 360 has ONE final fantasy game sony has gotten most of them through some way or another. Also you are not the voice of peace you are the person who started all of this by saying that the 360 is going to get versus. You need to stop beliving everything you read. SE has said that it is going to only be on the ps3.

DoUFolksLikCofe
DoUFolksLikCofe

@ thorsen-ink oh right.... well then... duh at me lol -smacks forehead- But u do print suspicions don't you i mean id have expected u to at least mention the bundle in the last article regarding the sales considering it was obviously going to have some effect? Maybe you did and im stupid again. Either way its irrelevant, lol sorry bout that

cjasko94
cjasko94

bigsolid88 What because they like video games that you don't? But ok, still nice to see Playstation 3 getting some great sales. Not that Microsoft's 360 and Nintendo's wii arent selling. (sorry for my grammer I'm tired and should go to bed =P)

bigsolid88
bigsolid88

japan is full of super nerd. any agree with me?

SalarianChemist
SalarianChemist

@nerd assassin Thank you for saying that I am an "ambassador of peace." You hit the nail perfectly on the head. ... All I was trying to do was simply explain the theory that the rumors saying Xbox 360 will get FF13 Versus in western markets is true. This theory seems reasonable, since it is based on the fact that Xbox 360 already has a Final Fantasy game while PS3 doesn't, and Xbox 360 will also be getting Final Fantasy 13. It really seems very reasonable that Xbox 360 will receive Final Fantasy 13 Versus in all the markets it receives Final Fantasy 13. It's not like I said this as a "troll" or a "fanboy." I also pointed out that I honestly didn't think the Xbox 360 would get FF13 Verus in Japan, since Xbox 360 won't see FF13 in Japan. I would also like to mention something about my comment that said "exclusive announcements mean nothing when they are associated with the Playstation 3." I stand by that statement. History has repeatedly proven that "official" announcements publicly made at trade shows regarding "exclusive" games for the PS3 end up being worth nothing. In other words, those announcements have literally no value due to the fact that history has proven how "official" announcements can be changed so easily. The list of examples includes games like: Final Fantasy 13, Tekken 6, Assassins Creed, Devil May Cry 4, Unreal 3, Virtua Fighter 5, Fatal Inertia 3, and so many others. In fact, look at what happened with Fatal Inertia 3. It was originally "officially" announced as a Playstation 3 exclusive game. We then saw yet another example that announcements like that don't mean much when Fatal Inertia 3 was also announced for Xbox 360. But then we heard the announcement that the PS3 version was cancelled, and the game would be released exclusively for the Xbox 360! The game was in fact released for Xbox 360, but the developers wanted to finish the PS3 version, so it was eventually released for PS3, too. But the point here is that "announcements" like this regarding exclusive games for the PS3 have no value. Companies like Square Enix, Capcom, Midway, Koei, Ubisoft, EA, Sega, Namco and others of all made announcements of PS3 "exclusive" games, and then gone back on those announcements in order to release the games for the Xbox 360.

SalarianChemist
SalarianChemist

@nerd assassin "That is the point I'm trying to make. These type of " exclusive announcements" mean literally nothing when the are associated to the Playstation 3, because the PS3 is a sales failure." Please try to understand that it is not my "opinion" that the Playstation 3 is a "sales failure." Anyone who points out that the PS3 is a very distant last place in terms of worldwide sales is not being a fanboy or a troll. When people point out that the Playstation 3 is a failure in the area of sales, it is a 100% fact, not an opinion. The simple fact is that Sony had all the momentum heading into this seventh-generation of videogame hardware. The PS2 was by far the best-selling console in the sixth-generation of hardware, and the PS2 was considered the best console available for every genre except first-person shooters. The PS3 has all the momentum heading into generation seven, yet Sony dropped the ball because the PS3 failed to provide the software people wanted in virtually every genre. For example, the PS3 was on the market for three full holiday seasons before it saw the release of its first game in the Real-Time Strategy genre. This generation the Xbox 360 is by far the top-selling high-definition platform and is considered the best high-definition console in every genre of gaming -- even unique genres such as RTS, RPG, JRPG, Puzzle, Party, Board games. This is not an opinion, this is a fact based on numbers. For example, Xbox 360 comes with a great puzzle game called Hexic, and Xbox 360 has two Tetris games, while the PS3 has zero Tetris games. I mention Tetris because it is by far the most important puzzle game of all. Xbox 360 has been a sales success this generation -- even in Japan. The fact that Xbox 360 has reached the one-milion sold milestone in Japan is very impressive -- far more successful than the original Xbox in Japan, and far more successful than any previous American console in Japan. I always give credit where credit is due. In the past, I have pointed out that the PS3 has been a sales failure. But lately the PS3 has seen very much improved sales in Japan. If you read my previous comments, you will see the I congratulated Sony for doing so much better in Japan. You will also see that I ripped on Microsoft for not being more aggressive with getting Final Fantasy 7 for Xbox Live Arcade in Japan. As you know, Final Fantasy 7 was a PC game, so it would be very easy to put the game on Xbox 360 as some form of download. A lot of the articles give credit to the increases sales of PS3 in Japan to the FF13 demo, but I think a lot of it has to do with that FF7 download on PSN in Japan. So please, don't say that people are "trolls" just because they point out facts based on numbers. And let's be honest, two things seem very logical: 1. Xbox 360 will probably not get FF13 Versus in Japan, because Xbox 360 did not get FF 13 in Japan. 2. Xbox 360 probably will get FF13 Versus in the western markets, because Xbox 360 is getting FF13 in the western markets. Plus, Square Enix released FF11 for Xbox 360, and continues to release updates for the game. Square Enix has made it clear that the western markets are very important to their success...And the number-based fact is that the Xbox 360 completely dominates the PS3 in the western sales market. And I hate to be a party pooper, but the PS3 really is a sales and business "disappointment" and "failure" in the west, and actually in Japan, too. Remember, the PS3 was outsold by the Xbox 360 in Japan from the summer of 2008 until the end of 2008. Please do not classify those words as something like "troll terminology." Please simply accept the number-based fact that PS3 will not come close to achieving the level of success of the PS2, which is both a "disappointment" and "failure" for Sony due to the fact that Sony's goal was to create higher levels of success each generation.

Its_Quagmire
Its_Quagmire

If the PS3 does well in any way....gamespot is sure to have a negative comeback....sometimes i think gamespot can't stop choking on microsoft's floppy donkey di.....you can finish the sentence.

ShotgunSteiner
ShotgunSteiner

Pah, Xbox just keeps getting in the way.. Bummer...

joevit
joevit

Sucks that we cant get the game untill nest year. i want want this for 360!

brendanhunt1
brendanhunt1

@SalarianChemist "The word "exclusive" doesn't mean much when talking about third-party games " you right about that, thats why sony has a massive first party support compared to xbox