GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Nvidia GTX 780 Ti Review: A Powerful GPU With A Price To Match

The GTX 780 Ti just about pushes Nvidia back to the top of the GPU performance pile, but its price is far from competitive.

232 Comments

For the vast majority of PC players, 1080p is the benchmark for performance, and by far the most popular resolution in use for gaming (at least according to the latest Steam Hardware Survey). Games look great at 1080p, monitors are cheap and plentiful, and you don't need to spend a fortune on an insanely powerful GPU to drive them. But if you're running multiple monitors, high resolutions like 1600p or 4K, or if you're simply after some bragging rights, then the likes of a GTX 650 Ti or Radeon 7850 just aren't going to cut it.

Enter the GTX 780 Ti, the latest GPU from Nvidia based on the GK110 chip. That's the same full-fat Kepler chip used in the GTX Titan and GTX 780, both of which are already excellent performers at high-resolutions. The trouble is, they aren't the best performers anymore. AMD's latest R9 290X and R9 290 have benchmarked extremely well, not only taking the performance crown from their rival, but also seriously undercutting it in terms of price. Nvidia's latest round of price cuts evens the playing field somewhat, but there's nothing quite like the prestige of having "the world's fastest graphics card".

No Caption Provided

The 780 Ti, then, has a big job ahead of it. At an RRP of $699 (£559 in the UK), it's still around $100 more expensive than the 290X, so it isn't going to be winning any awards for value. In terms of performance, though, it's very impressive. The 780 Ti is the first GPU to make use of the entire GK110 chip, that is, the full 2880 single precision CUDA cores, 240 texture units, and 48 ROP units. Memory comes in the form of 3GB of extremely fast 7Gbps GDDR5 for 336GB/s of bandwidth, while the base clock speed gets a bump to 845Mhz, and the boost clock speed to 928Mhz. It does lack scientific features like HyperQ and high-end 64 bit performance, but on paper at least, the GTX 780 Ti is the most powerful gaming card Nvidia's released.

GTX 780 Ti GPU SpecsGTX 780 Ti Memory Specs

2880 CUDA Cores
845 Base Clock (MHz)
928 Boost Clock (MHz)
210 GigaTexels/sex Texture Filtering Rate
240 Texture Units
48 ROP units

7.0 Gbps Memory Clock
3072 MB Standard Memory Config
GDDR5 Memory Interface
384-bit GDDR5 Memory Interface Width
336 GB/s Memory Bandwidth
GTX 780 Ti Software SupportGTX 780 Ti Display Support
OpenGL 4.3
PCI Express 3.0
GPU Boost 2.0, 3D Vision, CUDA, DirectX 11, PhysX, TXAA, Adaptive VSync, FXAA, 3D Vision Surround, SLI-ready
Four displays for Multi Monitor
4096x2160 Maximum Digital Resolution
2048x1536 Maximum VGA Resolution
Two Dual Link DVI, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
GTX 780 Ti DimensionsGTX 780 Ti Power Specs
10.5 inches Length
4.3 inches Height
Dual-slot Width
250 W TDP
600 W Recommended Power Supply
One 8-pin and one 6-pin Power Connector

Software

Like all of Nvidia's GPUs, the 780 Ti comes bundled with GeForce Experience (GFE), an application that automatically optimizes the graphics settings of your games based upon your hardware. GFE automatically updates your drivers and scans your games library for supported games, aiming to target settings that achieve 40 to 60 frames per second. Since its release earlier in the year, GFE's performance has improved by leaps and bounds, with many more supported games and optimal settings chosen. Naturally, you'll be able to eke out more performance by diving in and editing things manually, but if you're happy to let GFE do the job for you, the results are impressive.

No Caption Provided

Also part of the 780 Ti software package is ShadowPlay, a gameplay capture system that leverages the H.264 encoder built into Kepler (600, 700 series) GPUs. It automatically records the last 20 minutes of gameplay at up to 1080p60 at 50Mbps in automatic mode, but you can record as much footage as your hard drive allows in manual mode. ShadowPlay's also due to support direct streaming to Twitch.tv, although that feature isn't in the current beta. The advantage of using ShadowPlay over something like Fraps is CPU and memory usage. In our testing we found it affected the frame rate far less than Fraps did, in many cases with a hit of just a few frames per second. The software is still in beta, though, so we experienced a few capturing hiccups and crashes, but hopefully those issues will be ironed out before its full release.

There's also a great games bundle attached to the 780 Ti, with copies of Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag, Batman: Arkham Origins and Splinter Cell: Black List coming with every card. That's a sweet deal considering they're such current games, and hey, if you've already got them there's always the joy of gifting or selling on eBay.

Performance

Our trusty Ivy Bridge PC backed the GTX 780 Ti, although this time we overclocked the CPU to 4.2Ghz for a little extra oomph. A 1080p monitor would have been a waste for such a card, so we went with Asus' PQ321Q 4K monitor to really test its pixel-pushing power. With the exception of Crysis 3, all games were run at maximum settings and where possible we used FXAA for a performance boost. Call Of Duty: Ghosts was run at a lower resolution of 2560x1600, due to a current lack of 4K support.

MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V Motherboard
ProcessorIntel Core i5 3570k @ 4.2Ghz
RAM16GB 1600Mhz DDR3 Corsair Vengeance RAM
Hard DriveCorsair Force GT/Samsung Spinpoint F3 1 TB
Power SupplyCorsair HX850 PSU
DisplayAsus PQ321Q @ 3840x2160/Dell 3007WFP-HC @ 2560x1600

Battlefield 4 (2x MSAA @ 3840x2160)

No Caption Provided
Average FPSMinimum FPSMaximum FPS
GTX 780 Ti322444
GTX Titan292140
GTX 780261336

Crysis 3 (High Settings, FXAA @ 3840x2160)

No Caption Provided
Average FPSMinimum FPSMaximum FPS
GTX 780 Ti302444
GTX Titan272234
GTX 780252037

Call Of Duty: Ghosts (HBAO+, FXAA @ 2560x1600)

No Caption Provided
Average FPSMinimum FPSMaximum FPS
GTX 780 Ti7528107
GTX Titan7647104
GTX 780543783

Bioshock Infinite (Ultra @ 3840x2160)

No Caption Provided
Average FPSMinimum FPSMaximum FPS
GTX 780 Ti503467
GTX Titan403361
GTX 780302561

Tomb Raider (Ultra @ 3840x2160)

No Caption Provided
Average FPSMinimum FPSMaximum FPS
GTX 780 Ti302343
GTX Titan292139
GTX 780281637

Metro: Last Light (Ultra @ 3840x2160)

No Caption Provided
Average FPSMinimum FPSMaximum FPS
GTX 780 Ti332749
GTX Titan292537
GTX 780252040

A Pricey Performer

As expected with such killer specs, the GTX 780 Ti screams through the likes of Battlefield 4 and Call Of Duty: Ghosts, even at 4K, easily beating the GTX 780 and even the $1000 Titan. It's an impressive showing for a card based on an architecture that's now well over a year and a half old, and represents the peak of Kepler's rendering abilities. While we unfortunately didn't have an AMD R9 290X on hand to make a direct comparison, judging by the benchmarks out there, the 780 Ti is a comparable card and once again places Nvidia within striking distance of, if not back at the top of GPU performance.

Such performance comes at a price, though. At over $100 more than the R9 290X and nearly $300 more than the similarly performing R9 290, the 780 Ti is an expensive choice. It's also $100 more expensive than the GTX 780, a GPU that's hardly a slouch when it comes to high-resolution performance. Yes, the 780 Ti is far more power-efficient than AMD's latest, and yes, it's a very quiet card in operation too, and we experienced none of the power throttling issues that are currently plaguing the R9 290.

Whether that's worth the extra cash, though, is debatable. No doubt about it, the GTX 780 Ti is a brilliant GPU backed by some brilliant software, but you can do a lot with that $100 saving (or even $300 if you plump for the R9 290). AMD's aggressive pricing has taken the shine off the GTX 780 Ti, but if you're all in for team green and have the high-res setup to do it justice, it's the absolute best you can get from Nvidia, and one of the best GPUs (a lot) of money can buy.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 232 comments about this story
232 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for wizardboyus
wizardboyus

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

wait...so battlefield 4 on next-gen consoles runs at 60 fps...but these beasts can't? i was thinkin of upgrading my computer, but i'd probably have to buy different power supply, as well as a new card...currently running a nvidia GT230, and it handled games on high settings until shortly after Borderlands 2. I think i'd rather just go all in on a next-gen console and a couple of games instead of trying to get one of these high-end gpu's..only to spend vast amounts of time troubleshooting and getting it to work correctly on my desktop. but i guess the gpu prices kind of balance out the fact that any single player game on PC is pretty much free..lol XD

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sammoth
sammoth

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> LMAO uh no the resolutions are much higher and Ultra settings. Higher texture resolutions and better lighting and shadows and AA.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for un3gr0
un3gr0

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> more highers resolutions means less frames than lowers resolution, PCs running games at 4k have the same power of the new gen consoles at 1080p. This cards have 4x more performance than PCs. I feel sorry for developers only porting games for PC. I would like to see super high resolution EXCLUSIVE pc games, that only PCs can run using the MAX of the hardware, but devs want money so, they want to sell in multiplataform. Valve should release Half Life 3 for only high end machines.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Kairysama
Kairysama

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> Wait for Witcher 3

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5c1f6975e595b
deactivated-5c1f6975e595b

99

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> No, because the PC is running on 4K resolution

Upvote • 
Avatar image for normanislost
normanislost

1748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> and lets not forget the console version is also running at the equivalent of medium settings

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Death_Masta187
Death_Masta187

2940

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >>

and 720p.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for danxxx
danxxx

687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

my gtx 670 ftw is good enough for 1080p, still nice card

4 • 
Avatar image for ydnarrewop
ydnarrewop

2292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

I'll stick with my gtx 680 sc signature for quite a while yet ty :D

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Joeguy00
Joeguy00

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Wouldn't mind an after market r9 290. I'm sure for $450 it would overclock pretty close to this, 5~10% performance for $250 and 1GB less VRAM is a no way from me.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for CPTCUDDLES
CPTCUDDLES

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

there arent even games that can take advantage of that


Upvote • 
Avatar image for normanislost
normanislost

1748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@CPTCUDDLES Future proofing Star citizen is on its way :D

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Zloth2
Zloth2

1780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> And Oculus Rift!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for CPTCUDDLES
CPTCUDDLES

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

jesus.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for neroist
neroist

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Ok, but where and when is the GTX 790 coming out?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hammoud
hammoud

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If this costs $700 and is better than the Titan, then why is the Titan still $1000?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Death_Masta187
Death_Masta187

2940

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >>

The Titan is not a gaming card.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> For the DP performance. Nvidia cut off the 780ti DP performance at 1/24.

2 • 
Avatar image for NeoBillbine
NeoBillbine

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Gamespot stop running benchmarks. Seriously an Asus P8Z68-V Motherboard, get out of here with that old piece of crap.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hammoud
hammoud

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> I don't know why a motherboard would matter. Can you please explain?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@hammoud @NeoBillbine He means that this mobo was out at Sandybridge intel tech and it might got an upgrade to Ivybridge CPU (but thats rare edit: Althoug Ishow he did it oO).

So in the end they have 3years/1,5years old CPU to test the GPUs which will be bottlencked more than today's Haswell CPUs.

2 • 
Avatar image for Jedilink109
Jedilink109

1609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Can't afford it anyway. I'm just going to wait til the next major round of GPU's come out.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ecs33
ecs33

1777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

I get about 30 FPS on most games with my 680 when running 5760X1080 close to max. That works for me.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

If people think this is expensive, wait to see the 780ti Black Edition 12GB VRAM. :P

<< LINK REMOVED >>

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Here is the link of the article.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti also in special black edition:

<< LINK REMOVED >>

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> Yeah I am changing it a lot. Trying to find the right one.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for shadowboy88
shadowboy88

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

In a few months this card will be obsolete......well kinda like old news, with that idea i find it hard to purchase any high end gpu, i am comfortable with mid range.

10 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5ffbaaf798f9b
deactivated-5ffbaaf798f9b

-3468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@shadowboy88 obsolete is the wrong term, this card will last you a lot of years, nice newer ones come out but its not like you need them.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for daabulls23
daabulls23

1223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Yeah, these are for those who want the best of the best. Nothing wrong with that, but for that extra 1% you're going to pay an extra 10%, at least. However, buying one of these means you don't have to buy one for a few years.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Well this card was out mostly to help Nvidia with the Maxwell release.

Maxwell is going to be released 2014Q1. But Fabs can do 20nm starting at June2014. So I guess with this move and a few pricecuts, they want to release 20nm Maxwell at june and not a 28nm Maxwell at February/March since they will have already in the market the top performing car.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for stev69
stev69

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

The vast majority of games wont even push top end cards or get the best out of them anyway. Top end gear is just for rich kids and bragging rights to be fair.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for stev69
stev69

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

@Coseniath And thats one game, hence the fact i used the word majority, and not "all games".

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@stev69Not really. This generation cannot play Crysis 3 at Max settings. << LINK REMOVED >>
It cannot play even at FXAA with 2560x1440:

<< LINK REMOVED >>

<< LINK REMOVED >>

Upvote • 
Avatar image for RedLegZeff
RedLegZeff

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Yeah, I prefer midrange as well. I think they give by far the best value. Not to say high end is bad. Just next years mid range will probably be comparable in power, cooler, and half the price.

4 • 
Avatar image for zanelli
zanelli

1224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 2

zanelli  Moderator

"210 GigaTexels/sex Texture Filtering Rate" Hahaha Mark what have you been doing with this GPU. What a typo :P

Upvote • 
Avatar image for RedLegZeff
RedLegZeff

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I think nvidia's big jump was the 800 series next year. Regardless, I plan on waiting a year until some major next gen games come out and we get some benchmarks on those, so I can get a card that will handle every port from the ps4/xboxone that comes to pc.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for wizardboyus
wizardboyus

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> now that's some good advice, no point in trying to purchase one of these beasts, only to find out later that they can't handle what game devs will throw at us next year..

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jayd02
jayd02

802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> pretty sure that was part of a bit

Upvote • 
Avatar image for wizardboyus
wizardboyus

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> i don't think anyone said that on this site, other than some stupid commenters. I used to be one of those idiots, until gamespot got a nice video player and had the feature by Seb on 30 vs 60 fps. it's literally night and day

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Conscrumptured
Conscrumptured

797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Will somebody who's rich buy this for me? It would be wonderful, thank you. ^.^

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Primeyuri
Primeyuri

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> get a job/ 700 dollar aint that much.

2 • 
Avatar image for vduong942
vduong942

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> it's a lot for someone on minimum wages, for someone who's unemployed, for someone who's homeless.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Conscrumptured
Conscrumptured

797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> Not when you have other responsibilities. I take it that's a no?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5887c3545bd6c
deactivated-5887c3545bd6c

763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> to you maybe, but 700 on a graphics card is alot more than your average person will spend on a piece to a pc

2 • 
Avatar image for Primeyuri
Primeyuri

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> the average dude can just get a console and get the crap version of games.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for marcusfeelius1
marcusfeelius1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

My GTX 760 is fine for all the gaming I do on my 23" monitor in 1080p. After all, BF4 runs fine at 40-60FPS on ultra. Can't complain.

5 • 
Avatar image for Conscrumptured
Conscrumptured

797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Well said. (: I couldn't agree more.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for McGregor
McGregor

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Is anyone using a monitor that does 2160p (3840x2160)? I looked at prices on those; I could buy an apple computer for the cost of that monitor alone! I have a feeling it will be a while before I need this kind of video card power on my current setup. Even 1440p monitors are still more than I spent on my whole gaming rig, not counting monitors (for a samsung/Asus at least).

Upvote • 
Avatar image for unreal101
unreal101

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@McGregor I've got a 4K monitor, and it's a pretty neat toy with all the settings cranked up.


That being said, I would not call it essential. The price difference for both the screen, and the PC parts needed to run 4K, is not proportional to the graphical improvement you get - or, at least, that you perceive.


Right now, I'd say the sweet spot is 1440P - the monitors are relatively affordable, and you could build a rig to run anything at 60fps at that res for under $1500

Upvote • 
Avatar image for unreal101
unreal101

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Hopefully the R9 290 & 290X outsell this thing, so that Nvidia price-drops it by a couple of hundred.

...then I will buy one.... or four XD

Upvote • 
Avatar image for demonkingx5
demonkingx5

664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Titan should be excluded from this list its more of a Devs card than a gamers card.

2 •